Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 12, 2016 - Issue 3
218
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Review of a Published Article

Kakitsuba N. Comfortable indoor lighting conditions evaluated from psychological and physiological responses. Leukos. Online publication doi: 10.1080/15502724.2015.1061945

REFERENCES

  • Bishop GF. 1987. Experiments with the middle response alternative in survey questions. Public Opin Quart. 51:220–232.
  • Burks SL. 1994. Managing your migraine. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press.
  • Chan JC. 1991. Response-order effects in Likert-type scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 51:531–540.
  • [CIE] Commission International de l’Éclairage. 2014. Guidance towards best practice in psychophysical procedures used when measuring relative spatial brightness. Vienna, Austria: CIE. 59 p.
  • Dawes J. 2008. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int J Market Res. 50:61–77.
  • Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London (UK): Sage Publications Ltd. 779 p.
  • Fotios S, Atli D. 2012. Comparing judgements of visual clarity and spatial brightness through an analysis of studies using the category rating procedure. LEUKOS. 8(4):261–281.
  • Fotios SA, Cheal C. 2010. Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Res Technol. 42(4):433–447.
  • Houser K, Tiller D. 2003. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Res Technol. 35(3):183–198.
  • Kakitsuba N. 2015. Comfortable indoor lighting conditions evaluated from psychological and physiological responses. LEUKOS. doi: 10.1080/15502724.2015.1061945
  • Kruithof AA. 1941. Tubular fluorescent lamps for general illumination. Philips Tech Rev. 6(3):65–73.
  • Litwin MS. 1995. How to measure survey reliability and validity. London (UK): Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Loe DL, Mansfield KP, Rowlands E. 1994. Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: experimental study. Lighting Res Technol. 26(3):119–133.
  • Logadóttir Á, Christoffersen J, Fotios SA. 2011. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set preferred illuminance in a workplace environment. Lighting Res Technol. 43(4):403–422.
  • Logadóttir Á, Fotios SA, Christoffersen J, Hansen SS, Corell DD, Dam Hansen C. 2013. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set preferred colour of ambient illumination. Color Res Appl. 38(1):46–57.
  • Moors G. 2008. Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement. Qual Quant. 42:779–794.
  • Parducci A, Perrett LF. 1971. Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus values. J Exp Psychol Monogr. 89:427–452.
  • Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgements. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd. 304 p.
  • Rea MS. 1982. Calibration of subjective scaling responses. Lighting Res Technol. 14(3):121–129.
  • Uttley J, Fotios S, Cheal C. 2013. Satisfaction and illuminances set with user-controlled lighting. Archit Sci Rev. 56(4):306–314.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.