Effects of Intersection Lighting Design on Nighttime Visual Performance of Drivers

References

• [AASHTO] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2011. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets: 2011. Washington (DC): American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 912 p.
   Google Scholar
• Adrian W. 1989. Visibility of targets: model for calculation. Lighting Res Technol. 21:181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Aulhorn E. 1964. On the relationship between light sensitivity and visual acuity. A Graef Arch Klin Ex. 167:4–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhagavathula R, Gibbons RB. 2013. Role of expectancy, motion and overhead lighting on nighttime visibility. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting. 2013 Sept.; San Diego, CA. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications. p. 1963–1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagavathula R, Gibbons RB, Edwards CJ. 2012. Effect of static and moving objects on driver eye movements and detection distances. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting; 2012 Jan.; Washington, D.C. Washington (D.C.): Transportation Research Board. 15 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagavathula R, Gibbons RB, Edwards CJ. 2015. Relationship between roadway illuminance level and nighttime rural intersection safety. Transport Res Rec. 2485:8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce P. 1973. Age, illuminance, visual performance and preference. Lighting Res Technol. 5:125–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough J, Donnell E, Rea M. 2013. To illuminate or not to illuminate: roadway lighting as it affects traffic safety at intersections. Accident Anal Prev. 53:65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. 2010. Lighting of roads for motor and pedestrian traffic. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No. 115:2010.
   Google Scholar
• Derefeldt G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B. 1979. Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol. 57:679–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnell ET, Porter RJ, Shankar VN. 2010. A framework for estimating the safety effects of roadway lighting at intersections. Safety Sci. 48:1436–1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards CJ. 2015. Lighting levels for isolated intersections leading to safety improvements. Minneapolis (MN): UoM Center for Transportation Studies. 70 p.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards CJ, Gibbons RB. 2008. Relationship of vertical illuminance to pedestrian visibility in crosswalks. Transport Res Rec. 2056:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Eloholma M, Ketomäki J, Orreveteläinen P, Halonen L. 2006. Visual performance in night-time driving conditions. Ophthal Physl Opt. 26:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DW, Ginsburg AP. 1985. Contrast sensitivity predicts age-related differences in highway-sign discriminability. Hum Factors. 27:637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Qasem H, Cheal C, Uttley J. 2016. A pilot study of road lighting, cycle lighting and obstacle detection. Lighting Res Technol. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RB, Edwards CJ, Bhagavathula R, Carlson P, Owens DA. 2012. Development of visual model for exploring relationship between nighttime driving behavior and roadway visibility features. Transport Res Rec. 2298:96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RB, Flintsch A, Williams B, Du J, Rakha H. 2013. Evaluation of impact of modern headlamp technology on design criteria for sag vertical curves. Transport Res Rec. 2384:65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills BL. 1975. Visibility under night driving conditions: part 2. Field measurements using disc obstacles and a pedestrian dummy. Lighting Res Technol. 7:251–258.
   Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2005. American national standard practice for roadway lighting. New York (NY): IESNA. Publication No. RP-8-00.
   Google Scholar
• Isebrands HN, Hallmark SL, Hans Z, McDonald T, Preston H, Storm R. 2006. Safety impacts of street lighting at isolated rural intersections—part II. Publication No. MN/RC-2006-35. Ames (IA): Center for Transportation Research and Education. 120 p.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff MS. 1992. The effect of headlights on small target visibility. J Illum Eng Soc. 21:46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Janoff MS. 1993. The relationship between small target visibility and a dynamic measure of driver visual performance. J Illum Eng Soc. 22:104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Joulan K, Brémond R, Hautière N. 2015. Towards an analytical age-dependent model of contrast sensitivity functions for an ageing society. Sci World J. 2015: 15p.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeur A, Bremond R, Bastien JMC. 2010. The effect of the driving activity on target detection as a function of the visibility level: implications for road lighting. Transport Res F-Traf. 13:115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Minoshima O, Oka K, Ikehara K, Inukai N. 2006. Research on accident reduction by intersection lighting. In: Proceedings of the Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australasia (REAAA) conference; 2006 Nov. 20–24; Manila, Philippines. Manila (Philippines): Road Engineering Association of the Philippines. p. 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch JB. 2003. Illuminating engineering: from Edison’s lamp to the LED. New York (NY): Visions Communications. 770 p.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. 2014. Traffic safety facts 2013. Washington (DC): National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D. 1983. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res. 23:689–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oya H, Ando K, Kanoshima H. 2002. A research on interrelation between illuminance at intersections and reduction in traffic accidents. Journal of Light & Visual Environment. 26:29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pretto P, Chatziastros A. 2006. Changes in optic flow and scene contrast affect the driving speed. In: Proceedings of the driving simulation conference Europe; 2006 Nov.; Paris, France. Paris (France): Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et Leur Sécurité. p. 263–272.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS. 2000. The IESNA lighting handbook: reference & application. New York (NY): IESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Bullough JD, Zhou Y. 2010. A method for assessing the visibility benefits of roadway lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 42(2):215–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Ouellette M. 1991. Relative visual performance: a basis for application. Lighting Res Technol. 23:135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Salvi SM, Akhtar S, Currie Z. 2006. Ageing changes in the eye. Postgrad Med J. 82:581–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D. 1985. The effects of expectancy, clothing reflectance, and detection criterion on nighttime pedestrian visibility. Hum Factors. 27:327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smadi O, Hawkins N, Aldemir-Bektas B. 2011. Roadway lighting and safety: phase II—monitoring quality, durability and efficiency. I. Ames (IA): IHRB Project TR-601. 46 p.
   Google Scholar
• Terry TN, Gibbons RB. 2015. Road-surface contrast and adaptation of visibility of low-contrast targets. In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 94th annual meeting; 2015 Jan.; Washington, D.C. Washington (D.C.): Transportation Research Board. 14 p. Report 15–4845.
   Google Scholar
• Turner S, Sandt L, Toole J, Benz R, Petten R. 2006. FHWA university course on bicycle and pedestrian transportation: student workbook. McLean (VA): Federal Highway Administration. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-05-133. 453 p.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bommel WJ, Tekelenburg J. 1986. Visibility research for road lighting based on a dynamic situation. Lighting Res Technol. 18:37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wortman R, Lipinski M. 1974. Rural at-grade intersection illumination. UILU-ENG-74-2011. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. 72 p.
   Google Scholar
• Zwahlen H, Schnell T. 1999. Visibility of road markings as a function of age, retroreflectivity under low-beam and high-beam illumination at night. Transport Res Rec. 1692:152–163.
   Google Scholar