Chroma Shift and Gamut Shape: Going Beyond Average Color Fidelity and Gamut Area

References

• Boyce PR. 1977. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Light Res Technol. 9(1):11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Simons RH. 1977. Hue discrimination and light sources. Light Res Technol. 9(3):125–140.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1995. Method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties of light sources. 3rd ed. Vienna (Austria): CIE. 13.3. 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2004. 15:2004 Colorimetry Third Edition. Vienna (Austria): CIE.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2017. Colour fidelity index for accurate scientific use. Vienna (Austria): CIE. 224:2017. 44 p.
   Google Scholar
• David A. 2013. Color fidelity of light sources evaluated over large sets of reflectance samples. LEUKOS. 10(2):59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A, Fini PT, Houser KW, Ohno Y, Royer MP, Smet KA, Wei M, Whitehead L. 2015. Development of the IES method for evaluating the color rendition of light sources. Opt Express. 23(12):15888–15906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis W, Ohno Y. 2010. Color quality scale. Opt Eng. 49(3):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Beer E, Van Der Burgt P, Van Kemenade J. 2015. Another color rendering metric: do we really need it, can we live without it? LEUKOS. 12(1–2):51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Maier MA. 2014. Color psychology: effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annu Rev Psychol. 65:95–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito T. 2016. Modeling color rendition and color discrimination with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape [dissertation]. University Park (PA): Penn State University. 176 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD. 2013. Color appearance models. Chichester (UK): Wiley. 472 p.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Houser KW. 2004. A review of colour rendering indices and their application to commercial light sources. Light Res Technol. 36(3):183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Mossman M, Smet K, Whitehead L. 2016. Tutorial: color rendering and its applications in lighting. LEUKOS. 12(1–2):7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Wei M, David A, Krames MR, Shen XS. 2013. Review of measures for light-source color rendition and considerations for a two-measure system for characterizing color rendition. Opt Express. 21(8):10393–10411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IES] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2015. Method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): IES. IES-TM-30-15. 26 p.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Dangol R, Hyvarinen M, Bhusal P, Puolakka M, Halonen L. 2013. User preferences for LED lighting in terms of light spectrum. Light Res Technol. 45(6):641–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost-Boissard S, Avouac P, Fontoynont M. 2014. Assessing the colour quality of LED sources: naturalness, attractiveness, colourfulness and colour difference. Light Res Technol. 47(7):769–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost-Boissard S, Fontoynont M, Blanc-Gonnet J. 2009. Perceived lighting quality of LED sources for the presentation of fruit and vegetables. J Mod Optic. 56(13):1420–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh T, Bodrogi P. 2016. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, Part 3: experiments with makeup products and analysis of the complete warm white dataset. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516669558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh TQ, Bodrogi P, Vinh Q, Stojanovic D. 2016a. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, part 1: experiments in a room. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516643570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh TQ, Bodrogi P, Vinh Q, Stojanovic D. 2016b. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, part 2: experiments in a viewing booth and analysis of the combined dataset. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516643570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh TQ, Vinh QT, Bodrogi P. 2016. A numerical analysis of recent colour rendition metrics. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516632568
   Google Scholar
• Liu A, Tuzikas A, Zukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Vitta P, Shur M. 2013. Cultural preferences to color quality of illumination of different artwork objects revealed by a color rendition engine. IEEE Photonics J. 5(4):6801010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Huang Z, Xiao K, Pointer MR, Westland S, Luo MR. 2017. Gamut volume index: a color preference metric based on meta-analysis and optimized colour samples. Opt Express. 25(14):16378–16391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo MR, Cui G, Li C. 2006. Uniform colour spaces based on CIECAM02 colour appearance model. Color Res Appl. 31(4):320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y. 2005. Spectral design considerations for white LED color rendering. Opt Eng. 44(11):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Fein G, Miller C. 2015. Vision experiment on chroma saturation for color quality preference. In: 28th CIE Session; 2015 Jun 28–Jul 4; Manchester, UK: Vienna (Austria): Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 2124.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Freyssinier-Nova JP. 2008. Color rendering: a tale of two metrics. Color Res Appl. 33(3):192–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wei M. 2017. The role of presented objects in deriving color preference criteria from psychophysical studies. LEUKOS. 13(3):143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wilkerson A, Wei M. 2017. Human perceptions of color rendition at different chromaticities. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153517725974.
   Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wilkerson A, Wei M, Houser K, Davis R. 2016. Human perceptions of colour rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516663615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, David A, Whitehead L. 2015. Why color space uniformity and sample set spectral uniformity are essential for color rendering measures. LEUKOS. 12(1–2):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, Hanselaer P. 2015. Memory and preferred colours and the colour rendition of white light sources. Light Res Technol. 48(4):393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2011. Correlation between color quality metric predictions and visual appreciation of light sources. Opt Express. 19(9):8151–8166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó F, Csuti P, Schanda J. 2009. Color preference under different illuminants—new approach of light source coloour quality. In: Light and Lighting Conference with Special Emphasis on LEDs and Solid State Lighting; 2009 May 27–29; Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó F, Keri R, Schanda J, Csuti P, Mihalyko-Orban E. 2014. A study of preferred colour rendering of light sources: home lighting. Light Res Technol. 48(2):103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen C, Van Der Heijden F, Poort SHM, De Beer E. 2016. Characterising user preference for white LED light sources with CIE colour rendering index combined with a relative gamut area index. Light Res Technol. 49(4):461–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1972. Color-discrimination index. J Opt Soc Am. 62(2):191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1973. Fluorescent lamps with high color-discrimination capability. J Illum Eng Soc. 3(1):61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Burgt P, Van Kemenade J. 2010. About color rendition of light sources: the balance between simplicity and accuracy. Color Res Appl. 35(2):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kemenade J, Van der Burgt P. 1988. Light sources and color rendering: additional information to the Ra-index. In: CIBSE National Lighting Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kemenade J, Van der Burgt P. 1995. Toward a user oriented description of color rendition of light sources. In: CIE 23rd Session, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Vick K, Allen GR. 2014. Quantifying consumer lighting preference. IN: 14th International Symposium on the Science and Technology of Lighting (LS14); 2014 Jun 22–27; Como, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW. 2017. Systematic changes in gamut size affect color preference. LEUKOS. 13(1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW, David A, Krames M. 2014. Perceptual responses to LED illumination with colour rendering indices of 85 and 97. Light Res Technol. 47(7):810–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW, David A, Krames M. 2016a. Colour gamut size and shape influence colour preference. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516651472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW, David A, Krames M. 2016b. Effect of gamut shape on color preference. In: Lighting quality and energy efficiency. Melbourne, Australia. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 32-41.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Wei M, Smet K, Lin Y. 2016. The prediction of perceived colour differences by colour fidelity metrics. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print: Doi:10.1177/1477153516653650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Vitta P, Tuzikas A, Petrulis A, Shur M. 2012. Color rendition engine. Opt Express. 20(5):5356–5367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar