Brightness Model for Neutral Self-Luminous Stimuli and Backgrounds

References

• Alf EF, Grossberg JM. 1979. The geometric mean: confidence limits and significance tests. Percept Psych. 26:419–421. doi:10.3758/BF03204171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend LE, Spehar B. 1993. Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 2. Reflectance variation. Percept Psych. 54:457–568. doi:10.3758/BF03211768.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for unipolar magnitude estimation of sensory attributes. E1697-05:e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Baek YS, Kwak Y, Park SO. 2017. Monitor brightness changes under wide range of surround conditions. J Opt Soc Am. 34:216–223. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.34.000216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartleson CJ, Breneman EJ. 1967. Brightness perception in complex fields. J Opt Soc Am. 57:953–957. doi:10.1364/JOSA.57.000953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmann H-W, La Toison M. 1994. Predicted brightness–luminance phenomena. Light Res Technol. 26:135–143. doi:10.1177/096032719402600302.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M. 2002. Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. J Vis. 2:531–542. doi:10.1167/2.8.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R. 1993. Gray scale and achromatic color difference. J Opt Soc Am A. 10:1380–1391. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.10.001380.
   Google Scholar
• Chichilnisky EJ, Wandell BA. 1996. Seeing gray through the ON and OFF pathways. Vis Neurosci. 13:591–596. doi:10.1017/S0952523800008270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 2006. Fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes. Part 1. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 45 pages.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 2011a. International lighting vocabulary. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 203 pages.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 2011b. Supplementary system of photometry. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. 21 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Christian W. 2011. Experimental design. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD. 2005. Color appearance models. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 409 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD, Reniff L. 1995. Time-course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments. J Opt Soc Am A. 12:824–833. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.12.000824.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner G. 1860. Elemente der psychophysik. Leipzig (Germany): Breitkopf Und Härtel. 362 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Maloigne C. 2013. Advanced color image processing and analysis. New York (NY): Springer. 514 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fu C, Li C, Cui G, Luo MR, Hunt RWG, Pointer MR. 2012. An investigation of colour appearance for unrelated colours under photopic and mesopic vision. Color Res Appl. 37:238–254. doi:10.1002/col.20691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García PA, Huertas R, Melgosa M, Cui G. 2007. Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences. J Opt Soc Am A. 24:1823–1829. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.24.001823.
   Google Scholar
• Guth SL. 2002. In: Chung R, Rodrigues A, editors. ATD01 model for color appearances, color differences, and chromatic adaptation. In: Chung R, Rodrigues A (eds.). p. 303–306. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt RWG. 1982. A model of colour vision for predicting colour appearance. Color Res Appl. 7:95–112. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt RWG. 1991. Revised colour-appearance model for related and unrelated colours. Color Res Appl. 16:146–165. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt RWG, Robert WG, Pointer M. 2011. Measuring colour. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley. 469 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Hurvich L, Jameson D. 1957. An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychol Rev. 64:384–404. doi:10.1037/h0041403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MH, Weyrich T, Kautz J. 2009. Modeling human color perception under extended luminance levels. ACM T Graphic. 28(27):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdom F, Prins N. 2013. Psychophysics: A practical introduction. London (UK): Academic Press. 297 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang J, Johnson GM, Fairchild MD. 2007. iCAM06: a refined image appearance model for HDR image rendering. J Vis Commun Image R. 18:406–414. doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel T, Reinhard E. 2009. A neurophysiology-inspired steady-state color appearance model. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 26(4):776–782.
   Google Scholar
• Ledda P, Santos LP, Chalmers A. 2004. A local model of eye adaptation for high dynamic range. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualization Interaction in Africa. Stellenbosch (South Africa): November 03–05.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Li Z, Wang Z, Xu Y, Luo MR, Cui G, Melgosa M, Pointer M. 2016. A revision of CIECAM02 and its CAT and UCS. Color Imaging Conf. 1:208–212. doi:10.2352/ISSN.2169-2629.2017.32.208.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis VL, Maud Menten ML, Goody RS, Johnson KA. 1913. Die kinetik der invertinwirkung [The kinetics of invertase action]. Biochemische Zeitschrift. 49:333–369.
   Google Scholar
• Moroney N, Fairchild MD, Hunt RWG, Li C, Luo MR, Newman T. 2002. The CIECAM02 color appearance model. Color Imaging Conf. 2002:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nayatani Y. 1997. Simple estimation methods for the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch effect. Color Res Appl. 22:385–401. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199712)22:6<385::AID-COL6>3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattanaik SN, Tumblin J, Yee H, Greenberg DP. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. SIGGRAPH 2000 Procedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New Orleans (LA): July 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rinner O, Gegenfurtner KR. 2000. Time course of chromatic adaptation for color appearance and discrimination. Vision Res. 40:1813–1826. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00050-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seim T, Valberg A. 2016. A neurophysiologically-based analysis of lightness and brightness perception. Color Res Appl. 41:339–351. doi:10.1002/col.v41.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Zhai Q, Luo MR, Hanselaer P. 2017a. Study of chromatic adaptation using memory color matches, Part I: neutral illuminants. Opt Express. 25:8350–8365. doi:10.1364/OE.25.007732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Zhai Q, Luo MR, Hanselaer P. 2017b. Study of chromatic adaptation using memory color matches, Part II: colored illuminants. Opt Express. 25:8350–8365. doi:10.1364/OE.25.008350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Stevens SS. 1963. Brightness function: effects of adaptation. J Opt Soc Am. 53:375–385. doi:10.1364/JOSA.53.000375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens SS. 1957. The psychological review on the psychophysical law 1. Psychol Rev. 64:153–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens SS. 1962. The psychophysics of sensory function. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 934–940.
   Google Scholar
• Valeton JM. 1983. Photoreceptor light adaptation models: an evaluation. Vision Res. 23:1549–1554. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90168-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeton JM, van Norren D. 1983. Light adaptation of primate cones: an analysis based on extracellular data. Vision Res. 23:1539–1547. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(83)90167-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos JJ, Walraven PL. 1971. On the derivation of the foveal receptor primaries. Vision Res. 11:799–818. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(71)90003-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner A, Sharpe LT, Zrenner E. 2000. Asymmetries in the time-course of chromatic adaptation and the significance of contrast. Vision Res. 40:1101–1113. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00012-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle P. 1992. Brightness, discriminability and the “crispening effect.” Vision Res. 32:1493–1507. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90205-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withouck M, Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2014. Predicting the brightness of unrelated self-luminous stimuli. Opt Express. 22:16298–16309. doi:10.1364/OE.22.016298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withouck M, Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Hanselaer P. 2015. Experimental driven modelling of the color appearance of unrelated self-luminous stimuli: CAM15u. Opt Express. 23:12045–12064. doi:10.1364/OE.23.012045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withouck M, Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Koenderink J, Hanselaer P. 2013. Brightness perception of unrelated self-luminous colors. J Opt Soc Am A. 30:1248–1255. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.30.001248.
   Google Scholar
• Xie Z, Stockham TG. 1989. Toward the unification of three visual laws and two visual models in brightness perception. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb. 19:379–387. doi:10.1109/21.31040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Kerofsky L. 2011. Improving content visibility for high-ambient-illumination viewable display and energy-saving display. J Soc Inf Display. 19:645–654. doi:10.1889/JSID19.9.645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar