Using Category Rating to Evaluate the Lit Environment: Is a Meaningful Opinion Captured?

References

• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 1988. Brightness luminance relations: Classified bibliography. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No: CIE 078-1998.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2010. Lighting of roads for motor and pedestrian traffic. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No: CIE 115:2010.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2014. Guidance towards best practice in psychophysical procedures used when measuring relative spatial brightness. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No: CIE 212:2014.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2016. ILV: International lighting vocabulary, 2nd edition. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No: CIE DIS 017/E:2016.
   Google Scholar
• Acuña-Rivera M, Uzzell D, Brown J. 2011. Perceptions of disorder, risk and safety: The method and framing effects. Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje Psyecology: revista Bilingüe de Psicología Ambiental. Bilingual J Environ Psychol. 2(2):167–77.
   Google Scholar
• Adrian W, Schreuder DA. 1970. A simple method for the appraisal of glare in street lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 2(2):61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Akashi Y, Muramatsu R, Kanaya S. 1996. Unified glare rating (UGR) and subjective appraisal of discomfort glare. Lighting Res Technol. 28(4):199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Alfonso-Reese LA. 2001. Technique for estimating perceptual noise in categorization tasks. Behavior research methods. Instr Comput. 33(4):489–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett J. 2002. Subjective rating scales: science or art? Ergonomics. 45(14):966–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong SW, Algozzine B, Sherry L. 1979. Perceived brightness and classroom interactions. Educ Res Q. 4:54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston SM, Bellchambers HE. 1969. Illumination, colour rendering and visual clarity. Lighting Res Technol. 1(4):259–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bangali J. 2015. Evaluation of discomfort glare by using lighting simulation software for optimal designing of indoor illumination systems. Int J Emerging Eng Res Technol. 3(12):173–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bellchambers HE, Godby AC. 1972. Illuminance, colour rendering and visual clarity. Lighting Res Technol. 4(2):104–06.
   Google Scholar
• Berman SM, Jewett DL, Fein G, Saika G, Ashford F. 1990. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 22(1):37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 1977. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Lighting Res Technol. 9:11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2014. Human factors in lighting. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Cuttle C. 1990. Effect of correlated colour temperature on the perception of interiors and colour discrimination. Lighting Res Technol. 22(1):19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Eklund NH, Hamilton BJ, Bruno LD. 2000. Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Res Technol. 32:79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. 2004. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 328:1312–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright Lights. 2016. Discussion one: Kynthia and Peter (22/09/2016). [ accessed 2017 Jan 6]. http://brightlights-research.blogspot.co.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Brink M, Schreckenberg D, Vienneau D, Cajochen C, Wunderli JM, Probst-Hensch N, Röösli M. 2016. Effects of scale, question location, order of response alternatives, and season on self-reported noise annoyance using ICBEN scales: A field experiment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(11):1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 1992. BS5489, road lighting: Part 3, code of practice for lighting for subsidiary roads and associated pedestrian areas. London (UK): BSI.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough J, Brons JA, Qi R, Rea MS. 2008. Predicting discomfort glare from outdoor lighting installations. Lighting Res Technol. 40:225–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson KB, Greenhouse DS, Barton JE, Chow C 2009. Methods to Address Headlight Glare. California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2009-20. California Partners For Advanced Transit And Highways.
   Google Scholar
• Davis RG, Ginthner DN. 1990. Correlated color temperature, illuminance level and the Kruithof curve. J Illuminating Eng Soc Winter. 19:27–38.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer JB. 1961. The application of sodium lamps to public lighting. Illum Eng. 56(4):293–312.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer JB, Schreuder DA. 1967. Glare as a criterion for quality in street lighting. Trans Illuminating Eng Soc. 32(2):117–35.
   Google Scholar
• DeLaney WB, Hughes PC, McNelis JF, Sarver JF, Soules TF. 1978. An examination of visual clarity with high colour rendering fluorescent light sources. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 7(2):74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feynman RP. 1974. Cargo cult science: some remarks on science, pseudoscience, and learning how to not fool yourself. Caltech’s 1974 Commencement address. Eng Sci. June:10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn JE, Spencer TJ. 1977. The effects of light source colour on user impression and satisfaction. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 6:167–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn JE, Spencer TJ, Martyniuk O, Hendrick C. 1973. Interim study of procedures for investigating the effect of light on impression and behaviour. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 3(1):87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2001. An error in brightness matching associated with the application of dimming. Lighting Res Technol. 33(4):223–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2015. Research Note: Uncertainty in subjective evaluation of discomfort glare. Lighting Res Technol. 47(3):379–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2016a. The road less travelled. Lighting J. 81(5):20–23. May.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2016b. Review of a published article (Kakitsuba N. Comfortable Indoor Lighting Conditions Evaluated from Psychological and Physiological Responses). Leukos. 12(3):173–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2016c. Comment on of empirical evidence for the design of public lighting. Saf Sci. 86:88–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2017a. A revised Kruithof graph based on empirical data. Leukos. 13(1):3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2017b. Response to comments from K. Cuttle. Leukos. 13(1):19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Atli D. 2012. Comparing judgements of visual clarity and spatial brightness through an analysis of studies using the category rating procedure. Leukos. 8(4):261–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Atli D, Cheal C, Hara N. 2015b. Lamp spectrum and spatial brightness at photopic levels: investigating prediction using S/P ratio and gamut area. Lighting Res Technol. 47(5):595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Atli D, Cheal C, Houser K, Logadóttir A. 2015a. Lamp spectrum and spatial brightness at photopic levels: A basis for developing a metric. Lighting Res Technol. 47(1):80–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Castleton H. 2016. Specifying enough light to feel reassured on pedestrian footpaths. Leukos. 12(4):235–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C. 2007a. Lighting for subsidiary streets: investigation of lamps of different SPD. Part 2 – brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 39(3):233–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C. 2007b. Evidence for response contraction bias in side-by-side matching tasks. Lighting Res Technol. 39(2):159–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C. 2010. Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Res Technol. 42(4):433–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Cheal C. 2011. Predicting lamp spectrum effects at mesopic levels. part 1: spatial brightness. Lighting Res Technol. 43(2):143–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Gado T. 2005. A comparison of visual objectives used in side-by-side matching tests. Lighting Res Technol. 37(2):117–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Houser K. 2013. Using forced choice discrimination to measure the perceptual response to light of different characteristics. Leukos. 9(4):245–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Houser KW. 2009. Research methods to avoid bias in categorical ratings of brightness. Leukos. 5(3):167–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Houser KW, Cheal C. 2008. Counterbalancing needed to avoid bias in side-by-side brightness matching tasks. Leukos. 4(4):207–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Liachenko Monteiro A, Uttley J. 2018. Evaluation of pedestrian reassurance gained by higher illuminances in residential streets using the day-dark approach. Lighting Res Technol. Online First. doi:10.1177/1477153518775464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Uttley J, Liachenko-Monteiro A, Mattoni B, Bisegna F 2017. Field surveys of reassurance in two European cities using Boyce’s day-dark approach. Proceedings of CIE conference; Jeju Island (Korea), October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Foulsham T. 2018. Tweet posted 09/ 01/2018. https://twitter.com/tomfoulsh/status/950717308829388800.
   Google Scholar
• Fronczyk K. 2014. The identification of random or careless responding in questionnaires: the example of the neo-ffi22. Roczniki Psychologiczne/Ann Psychol. XVII(2):457–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gellatly and Weintraub. 1990. User reconfigurations of the de boer rating scale for discomfort glare. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gescheider GA. 1988. Psychophysical scaling. Annu Rev Psychol. 39:169–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohardoust Monfared I 2012. Importance of scale format, respondents attitude, and temporal effects in post-ocupancy evaluation surveys. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, the School of Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Han S, Boyce PR. 2003. Illuminance, CCT, décor and the Kruithof curve. 25th Session of the CIE, San Diego, 25 June to 2 July 2003 1(2):D3 282–285. (see also Han S. 2002. Effect of illuminance, CCT and décor on the perception of lighting. MS in Lighting thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY).
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Nayatani Y. 1994. Visual clarity and feeling of contrast. Color Res Appl. 19(3):171–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Yano T, Nayatani Y. 2000. Proposal of practical method for calculating and indexing feeling of contrast for light source. J Illuminating Eng Inst Japan. 84(11):843–50.
   Google Scholar
• Heise DR. 1969. Some methodological issues in semantic differential research. Psychol Bull. 72(6):406–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG. 1940. Discomfort glare in lighted streets. Trans Illuminating Eng Soc. 5:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK. 2003. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling. Lighting Res Technol. 35(3):183–98.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Tiller DK, Hu X 2003. Prototype demonstration of vision-tuned fluorescent lamps, EISG Final Report for CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Huang JL, Curran PG, Keeney J, Poposki EM, DeShon RP. 2012. Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. J Bus Psychol. 27(1):99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärine M 2015. Methodological questions in lighting acceptance and preference studies. Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University, Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation.
   Google Scholar
• Kakitsuba N. 2016. Comfortable indoor lighting conditions evaluated from psychological and physiological responses. Leukos. 12:163–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Nagao T, Yamanaka T, Kawai K, Sakakibara K-I 2010. Study on effect of room acoustics on timbral brightness of clarinet tones. Part II: An acoustic interpretation and synthesis of analytical results. Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010 23-27 August 2010; Sydney (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Kent M, Fotios S, Altomonte S. 2017. Discomfort glare evaluation: The influence of anchor bias in luminance adjustments. Lighting Res Technol. First Published October 13, 2017. doi:10.1177/1477153517734280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Altomonte S, Tregenza PR, Wilson R. 2016. Discomfort glare and time of day. Lighting Res Technol. 47(6):641–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruithof AA. 1941. Tubular fluorescent lamps for general illumination. Philips Tech Rev. 6(3):65–73.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoeuf RA, Shafir E. 2006. The long and short of it: physical anchoring effects. J Behavioural Decis Making. 19:393–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz P. 2010. Research into questionnaire design: A summary of the literature. Int J Market Res. 52(2):249–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Fotios S, Wei M, Liu Y, Guo W, Sun Y. 2015. Eye movement and pupil size constriction under discomfort glare. Investigative Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 56(3):1649–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Liu Y, Sun Y, Zhu X, Lai J, Heynderickx I. 2014. Model predicting discomfort glare caused by LED road lights. Opt Express. 22:18056–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart TE, Atsumi B, Ghosh A, Mekaroonreung H, Spaulding J. 2006. Effects of planar and non-planar driver-side mirrors on age-related discomfort-glare responses. Saf Sci. 44(3):187–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logadóttir Á, Christoffersen J, Fotios SA. 2011. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set preferred illuminance in a workplace environment. Lighting Res Technol. 43(4):403–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logadóttir Á, Fotios SA, Christoffersen J, Hansen SS, Corell DD, Dam Hansen C. 2013. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set preferred colour of ambient illumination. Colour Res Appl. 38(1):46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynes JA. 1996. Daylight and photometric anomalies. Lighting Res Technol. 28(2):63–67.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin S, Hankey J, Green CA, Larsen M. 2004. Discomfort glare ratings of swivelling HID headlamps. SAE Int. 2004-01-2257.
   Google Scholar
• Meade AW, Craig SB. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Met. 17(3):437–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Student Survey (NSS). 2017. (accessed 2017 Aug 2). http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbourhood Watch and the Suzy Lamplugh Trust (NW and SLT). 2013. Street Lighting and Perceptions Of Safety Survey: results And Analysis. November. (accessed 2017 Aug 2). http://www.ourwatch.org.uk/uploads/pub_res/Perceptions_of_Safety_survey_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ngai P, Boyce P. 2000. The effect of overhead glare on visual discomfort. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 29(2):29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. 1975. The measurement of meaning. 9th printing. Originally published in 1957. Chicago (IL): University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-74539-6.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhaus WKE, Bailey IL 1992. Large area glare sources and their effect on discomfort and visual performance at computer work stations. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 4-9 October 1992; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Peña-García A, Hurtado A, Aguilar-Luzón MC. 2015. Impact of public lighting on pedestrians’ perception of safety and well-being. Saf Sci. 78:142–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piferi RL, Jobe RL. 2003. Identifying careless responses in questionnaire research: a serendipitous finding. Psychol Rep. 93:320–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1977. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading. Br J Psychol. 68:409–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgements. London (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ramasoot T, Fotios SA. 2012. Lighting and display screens: Models for predicting luminance limits and disturbance. Lighting Res Technol. 44(2):197–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay M, Newton R 1991. The effect of better street lighting on crime and fear: A review. Crime Prevention Unit paper No. 29. London (UK): The Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS. 1982. Calibration of subjective scaling response. Lighting Res Technol. 14(3):121–29.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, Frischmann T, Brumbelow ML. 2016. Test track evaluation of headlight glare associated with adaptive curve HID, fixed HID, and fixed halogen low beam headlights. Ergonomics. 59(12):1586–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Clausen HJ, Bindels JTH. 1974. Assessment of discomfort glare in motor vehicle lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 6(2):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiker M, Fuchs X, Becker S, Shukuya M, Dovjak M, Hawighorst MKolarik J. 2017. Challenging the assumptions for thermal sensation scales. Building Research & Information. 45(5):572–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons RH, Hargroves RA, Pollard NE, Simpson MD. 1987. Lighting criteria for residential roads and areas. Venice (Austria): CIE; p. 274–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sivak M, Flannagan M, Ensing M, Simmons CJ. 1989. Discomfort glare is task dependent. UMTRI-89-27. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Song M, Kim Y-H. 2009. Mathematical characterization of the acoustic brightness and contrast control problem in complex vector space. J Acoust Soc Am. 125:2538.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton RM, Farrall S. 2005. Gender, socially desirable responding and the fear of crime. Br J Criminol. 45:212–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashiro T, Kawanobe S, Kimura-Minoda T, Kohko S, Ishikawa T, Ayama M. 2014. Discomfort glare for white LED light sources with different spatial arrangements. Lighting Res Technol. Published online 24 April 2014. doi:10.1177/1477153514532122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teller DY, Pereverzeva M, Civan AL. 2003. Adult brightness vs. luminance as models of infant photometry: variability, biasability, and spectral characteristics for two age groups favour the luminance model. J Vis. 3:333–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes J, Alferdinck JWAW, Perel M. 2002. Relation between glare and driving performance. Hum Factors. 44:95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA, Chen E. 1978. What is visual clarity? J Illuminating Eng Soc. 7:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller DK, Rea MS. 1992. Semantic differential scaling: prospects in lighting research. Lighting Res Technol. 24(1):43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rips RJ, Rasinski K. 2000. The psychology of survey response. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uttley J, Fotios S, Cheal C. 2013. Satisfaction and illuminances set with user-controlled lighting. Archit Sci Rev. 56(4):306–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijswijk L 2016. Shedding light on safety perceptions: Environmental information processing and the role of lighting. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vienot F, Durand M-L, Mahler E. 2009. Kruithof ’s rule revisited using LED illumination. J Mod Opt. 56(13):1433–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa C, Bremond R, Saint-Jacques E. 2017. Assessment of pedestrian discomfort glare from urban LED lighting. Lighting Res Technol. 49(2):945–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrabel PL, Bernecker CA, Mistrick RG. 1998. Visual performance and visual clarity under electric light sources: part II - Visual Clarity. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 27(1):29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg HF. 2005. The Total Survey Error Approach. London (UK): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worthey JA. 1985. An analytical visual clarity experiment. J Illuminating Eng Soc. 15(1):239–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar