Comparing Measures of Gamut Area

References

• Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa H. 1996. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans Math Softw. 22(4):469-83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 1977. Investigations of the subjective balance between illuminance and lamp colour properties. Light Res Technol. 9(1):11-24.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 1995. 13.3: method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties of light sources. 3rd ed. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2004. 15:2004 colorimetry. 3rd ed. Vienna (Austria): Commision Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2017. 224:2017 CIE 2017 Colour Fidelity Index for accurate scientific use. Vienna (Austria): Commision Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• David A. 2013. Color fidelity of light sources evaluated over large sets of reflectance samples. Leukos. 10(2):59-75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A, Esposito T, Houser K, Royer M, Smet K, Whitehead L. 2018. A vector field color rendition model for characterizing color shifts and metameric mismatch. LEUKOS. Submitted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• David A, Fini PT, Houser KW, Ohno Y, Royer MP, Smet KA, Wei M, Whitehead L. 2015. Development of the IES method for evaluating the color rendition of light sources. Opt Express. 23(12):15888-906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Maier MA. 2014. Color psychology: effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annu Rev Psychol. 65:95-120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito T. 2016. Modeling color rendition and color discrimination with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape [ Doctoral]. University Park (PA): Penn State University.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito T, Houser K. 2017. A new measure of colour discrimination for LEDs and other light sources. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print. doi:10.1177/1477153517729200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito T, Houser K. 2018. Models of colour quality over a wide range of spectral power distributions. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print. doi:10.1177/1477153518765953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD. 2013. Color appearance models. Chichester (UK): Wiley. p. 472.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios SA, Levermore GJ. 1998. Chromatic effect on apparent brightness in interior spaces I: introduction and colour gamut models. Light Res Technol. 30(3):97-102.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Houser KW. 2004. A review of colour rendering indices and their application to commercial light sources. Light Res Technol. 36(3):183-99.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Nayatani Y. 1994. Visual clarity and feeling of contrast. Color Res Appl. 19(3):171-85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto K, Yano T, Shimizu M, Nayatani Y. 2007. New method for specifying color-rendering properties of light sources based on feeling of contrast. Color Res Appl. 32(5):361-71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Wei M, David A, Krames MR, Shen XS. 2013. Review of measures for light-source color rendition and considerations for a two-measure system for characterizing color rendition. Opt Express. 21(8):10393-411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt R. 1952. Light and dark adaptation and the perception of color. J Opt Soc Am. 42:190-99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IES. 2015. IES-TM-30-15 method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. p. 26.
   Google Scholar
• IES. 2018. IES-TM-30-18 method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. p. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Jost S, Cauwerts C, Avouac P. 2018. CIE 2017 color fidelity index Rf: a better index to predict perceived color difference? J Opt Soc Am A. 35(4):B202-B213.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima Y, Ohno Y, Oh S. 2017. Vision experiment on verification of hunt effect for lighting. 11th Biennial Joint CIE/USNC and CNC/CIE Technical Conference; Gaithersburg, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Khanh T, Bodrogi P. 2016. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, Part 3: experiments with makeup products and analysis of the complete warm white dataset. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print. doi:10.1177/1477153516669558(0):1477153516669558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh T, Bodrogi P, Vinh Q, Stojanovic D. 2016a. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, Part 1: experiments in a room. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print. doi:10.1177/1477153516643359(0):1477153516643359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh T, Bodrogi P, Vinh Q, Stojanovic D. 2016b. Colour preference, naturalness, vividness and colour quality metrics, Part 2: experiments in a viewing booth and analysis of the combined dataset. Light Res Technol. Online Before Print. doi:10.1177/1477153516643570(0):1477153516643570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh TQ, Vinh QT, Bodrogi P. 2016c. A numerical analysis of recent colour rendition metrics. Light Res Technol. 49(5):561–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q. 2017. Gamut Volume Index. In: Royer M, editor.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Huang Z, Xiao K, Pointer MR, Westland S, Luo MR. 2017. Gamut Volume Index: a color preference metric based on meta-analysis and optimized colour samples. Opt Express. 25(14):16378-91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo MR, Cui G, Li C. 2006. Uniform colour spaces based on CIECAM02 colour appearance model. Color Res Appl. 31(4):320-30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Fein G, Miller C. 2015. Vision experiment on chroma saturation for color quality preference. 28th CIE Session; Jun 28–Jul 4; Manchester, UK. Vienna (Austria): Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage. p. 2124.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Freyssinier JP. 2010. Color rendering: beyond pride and prejudice. Color Res Appl. 35(6):401-09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Freyssinier JP. 2013. White lighting. Color Res Appl. 38(2):82-92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Freyssinier-Nova JP. 2008. Color rendering: A tale of two metrics. Color Res Appl. 33(3):192-202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M. 2017. Comparing measures of average color fidelity. LEUKOS. 14(2):69-85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Houser K, David A. 2017a. Chroma shift and gamut shape: going beyond average color fidelity and gamut area. LEUKOS. Online Before Print. doi:10.1080/15502724.2017.1372203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wei M. 2017. The role of presented objects in deriving color preference criteria from psychophysical studies. LEUKOS. 13(3):143-57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M, Wilkerson A, Wei M. 2017b. Human perceptions of color rendition at different chromaticities. Light Res Technol. Online before print. doi:10.1177/1477153517725974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP. 2016. What is the reference? An examination of alternatives to the reference sources used in IES TM-30-15. LEUKOS. 13(2):71-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Houser KW, Wilkerson AM. 2012. Color discrimination capability under highly structured spectra. Color Res Appl. 37(6):441-49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Wilkerson A, Wei M, Houser K, Davis R. 2016. Human perceptions of colour rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Light Res Technol. 49(8):966-91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, David A, Whitehead L. 2015. Why color space uniformity and sample set spectral uniformity are essential for color rendering measures. LEUKOS. 12(1–2):39-50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2011. Correlation between color quality metric predictions and visual appreciation of light sources. Opt Express. 19(9):8151-66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen C, Van Der Heijden F, Poort SHM, De Beer E. 2016. Characterising user preference for white LED light sources with CIE colour rendering index combined with a relative gamut area index. Light Res Technol. 49(4):461-80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1972. Color-discrimination index. J Opt Soc Am. 62(2):191-94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1973. Fluorescent lamps with high color-discrimination capability. J Illum Eng Soc. 3(1):61-64.
   Google Scholar
• Wei M, Bao W, Huang H. 2018. Consideration of light level in specifying light source color rendition. LEUKOS. Online Before Print. doi:10.1080/15502724.2018.1448992
   Google Scholar
• Wei M, Houser KW. 2017. Systematic changes in gamut size affect color preference. LEUKOS. 13(1):23-32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windisch R, Heidel G, Binder U, Bergenek K. 2017. Impact of spectral features of common LED lighting systems on TM-30 color indices. Opt Express. 25(3):1824-30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H. 1984. Color rendering capacity of illumination. J Illum Eng Soc. 13(2):270-76.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H. 1993. Colour rendering capacity and luminous efficiency of a spectrum. Int J Light Res Technol. 25(3):131-32.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Wei M, Smet K, Lin Y. 2016. The prediction of perceived colour differences by colour fidelity metrics. Light Res Technol. Online before print. doi:10.1177/1477153516653650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Xu H, Feng H. 2017. Toward a unified model for predicting color quality of light sources. Appl Opt. 56(29):8186-95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskas A, Vaicekauskas R, Ivanauskas F, Vaitkevicius H, Vitta P, Shur MS. 2009. Statistical approach to color quality of solid-state lamps. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 15(4):1189-98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar