The Language of Lighting: Applying Semiotics in the Evaluation of Lighting Design

References

• Anderson J. 2012. Environmental Impact of Light Pollution and its Abatement. Toronto (ON).
   Google Scholar
• Anselmo F, Mardaljevic J. 2013. Vernacular windows. Daylight & Architecture. 25-33.
   Google Scholar
• Babin B, Hardesty DM, Suter TA. 2003. Color and shopping intentions. The Intervening Effect of Price Fairness and Perceived Affect. Journal of Business Research. 56:541-551. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00246-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes R. 1997. The Eiffel Tower and other mythologies. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumberger C. 2010. Gebaute Zeichen. In Eine Symboltheorie der Architektur. Heusenstamm: Ontos.
   Google Scholar
• Baumberger C. 2014. Neue Arbeiten zur Architektursemiotik: zur Einführung. Zeitschrift Für Semiotik. 36:3-12.
   Google Scholar
• Bellizzi JA, Hite RE. 1992. Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psychology and Marketing. 9:347-363. doi:10.1002/mar.4220090502
   Google Scholar
• Bense M, Walther E. 1973. Wörterbuch der Semiotik. Köln  (Germany): Kiepenheuer und Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Benya JR. 2015. Nights in Davis: the initial LED streetlight installation went awry, but this story has a happy ending. Lighting Design and Application; p. 32-34.
   Google Scholar
• Bodgrogi P, Vinh QT, Khanh TQ. 2017. Opinion: the usefulness of light sources in human centric lighting. Lighting Research and Technology. 49:292. doi:10.1177/1477153517707427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta JP. 1979. Architecture and its interpretation: A study of expressive systems in architecture. London (UK): Lund Humphries.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2014. Human Factors in Lighting. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield J. 1993. The art of light + space. New York (NY): Abbeville Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Chayka K. 2016. The Oppressive Gospel of “Minimalism.” New York Times [accessed 2018 Apr 21]. Available from: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/31/magazine/the-oppressive-gospel-of-minimalism.html.
   Google Scholar
• Corbusier L. 1927. Towards a new architecture. London (UK): Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley AE. 1993. The two-dimensional impact of color on shopping. Marketing Letters. 4:59-69.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal D. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Fusco R. 1972. Architektur als Massenmedium. Gütersloh (Germany): Bertelsmann-Fachverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Delitz H. 2010. Gebaute Gesellschaft. Architektur als Medium des Sozialen. Frankfurt (Germany): Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Djalali A. 2017. Eisenman beyond Eisenman: language and architecture revisited. The Journal of Architecture. 22:1287-1298. doi:10.1080/13602365.2017.1394350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donougho M. 1987. The Language of Architecture. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 21:53-67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs H, Wright FL. 1953. A Conversation with Frank Lloyd Wright. USA: produced by King Studios for the National Broadcasting Company. Evanston (IL): Citadel Video; p. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Eco U. 1972. Einführung in die Semiotik. München: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor T. 2013. The gloomy city: rethinking the relationship between light and dark. Urban Studies. 52:422-38. doi:10.1177/0042098013504009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgala H, Mesleh R, Haas H 2011. Indoor Optical Wireless Communication: Potential and State-of-the-Art. IEEE Communications Magazine: 56-62.
   Google Scholar
• Evitts DE. 2012. Night Light. Architectural Lighting [accessed 2017 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.archlighting.com/projects/night-light_o.
   Google Scholar
• Fiell P, Fiell C. 2013. 1000 Lights. Cologne (Germany): Taschen.
   Google Scholar
• Frampton K. 2007. Modern architecture. In A critical history. London (UK): Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Gleiter JH. 2014. Die Präsenz der Zeichen: vorüberlegungen zu einer phänomenologischen Architektursemiotik. Zeitschrift Für Semiotik. 36:25-47.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman N. 1968. Languages of Art. In An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.
   Google Scholar
• Gottdiener M, Lagopoulos AP. 1986. The city and the sign. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groat L, Wang D. 2002. Architectural Research Methods. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad E. 2010. Christian Norberg-Schulz’s Phenomenological Project in Architecture. Architectural Theory Review. 15:88-101. doi:10.1080/13264821003629279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeulser MH. 2009. Media Facades. In History, Technology, Content. Ludwigsburg (Germany): av edition.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon S 2017. “These are people’s homes’: the art project making public housing in Sydney’s Waterloo glow. the guardian [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/sep/06/these-are-peoples-homes-the-sydney-art-project-making-public-housing-glow.
   Google Scholar
• Harries K. 1997. The Ethical Function of Architecture. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattenhauer D. 1984. The rhetoric of architecture: A semiotic approach. Communication Quarterly. 32:71-77. doi:10.1080/01463378409369534
   Google Scholar
• Hill R. 1999. Designs and their consequences. In Architecture and aesthetics. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes M. 2012. Lighting for interior design. London (UK): Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Kyriakou M-A, Petresin V, Schielke T, Weibel P. 2015. SuperLux. In Smart Light Art, Design & Architecture for Cities. London (UK): Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Jardin X. 2011. Interview with creator of Occupy Wall Street “bat-signal” projections during Brooklyn Bridge #N17 march. Boing Boing [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://boingboing.net/2011/11/17/interview-with-the-occupy-wall.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks C. 1977. The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. London (UK): Academy Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks C. 2005. The iconic building: the power of enigma. London (UK): Frances Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks C, Baird G. 1969. Meaning in Architecture. London (UK): Barrie & Jenkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R, Kaplan S. 1989. The Experience of Nature. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karanouh A, Kerber E. 2015. Innovations in dynamic architecture. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering. 3:185-221. doi:10.3233/FDE-150040
   Google Scholar
• Kelly K. 2017. A different type of lighting research – A qualitative methodology. Lighting Research & Technology. 49:933-942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly R. 1952. Light as an Integral Part of Architecture. College Art Journal. 12:24-30. doi:10.1177/1477153516659901
   Google Scholar
• Koenig GK. 1964. Analisi del linguaggio architettonico. Florence (Italy): Fiorentina.
   Google Scholar
• Krautter M, Schielke T. 2009. Light perspectives between culture and technology. Lüdenscheid (Germany): ERCO.
   Google Scholar
• Kress G, Van Leeuwen T. 2002. Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication. 1:343-368. doi:10.1177/147035720200100306
   Google Scholar
• Kyba CCM, Kuester T, Sánchez De Miguel A, Baugh K, Jechow A, Hölker F, Bennie J, Cd E, Kj G, Guanter L. 2017. Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Science Advances. 3:e1701528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagopoulos AP. 1993. Postmodernism, geography, and the social semiotics of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 11:255-278. doi:10.1068/d110255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam WMC. 1960. Lighting for Architecture. Architectural Record. 127:219-229.
   Google Scholar
• Lam WMC. 1977. Perception and lighting as formgivers for architecture. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford: (CA) Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden TJ, Hewett K, Roth MS. 2000. Managing Images in Different Cultures: A Cross-National Study of Color Meanings and Preferences. Journal of International Marketing. 8:90-107. doi:10.1509/jimk.8.4.90.19795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major M, Speirs J, Tischhauser A. 2005. Made of Light: the Art of Light and Architecture. Basel (Germany): Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield KP. 2018. Architectural lighting design: A research review over 50 years. Lighting Research and Technology. 50:80-97. doi:10.1177/1477153517736803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May S. 2004. Olafur Eliasson: the Weather Project. London (UK): Tate.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless S. 1939. A Method of Lighting the Stage. New York (NY): Theatre Arts Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan M. 1964. Understanding media: the extensions of man. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Medway P, Clark B. 2003. Imagining the building: architectural design as semiotic construction. Design Studies. 24:255-273. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00055-8
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell WJ. 1990. The logic of architecture. In Design, computation, and cognition. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mixter W. 2018. “Radiant Presence” Marks World AIDS Day with Guerrilla Slideshow. hoodline [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: http://hoodline.com/2015/12/radiant-presence-marks-world-aids-day-with-guerrilla-slideshow.
   Google Scholar
• Moran N. 2007. Performance Lighting Design: how to light for the stage, concerts and live events. Bloomsbury (UK): London.
   Google Scholar
• Munro CF. 1987. Semiotics, Aesthetics and Architecture. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 27:115-128. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/27.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National September 11 Memorial Museum. 2018. Tribute in Light. National September 11 Memorial Museum [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.911memorial.org/tribute-light.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann D. 2002. Architecture of the night: the illuminated building. Munich: (Germany) Prestel.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann D. 2010. The Structure of Light. In Richard Kelly and the Illumination of Modern Architecture. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nöth W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris attacks: buildings around the world are lit up in honour of the victims of Friday 13. 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2015/nov/14/paris-attacks-memorials-victims-friday-13 [ accessed 2018 Jan 13].
   Google Scholar
• Plummer H. 1995. Light in Japanese Architecture. Tokyo (Japan): Architecture and Urbanism.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer H. 2003. Masters of light. In First volume: twentieth-century pioneers. Tokyo (Japan): Architecture and Urbanism.
   Google Scholar
• Prak NL. 1968. The language of architecture. Nijmegen (Netherlands): Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Preziosi D. 1979. Architecture, Language, and Meaning. Mouton (Germany): The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Pridmore J. 2003. The Rookery: A Building Book from the Chicago Architecture Foundation. Rohnert Park (CA): Pomegranate Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Remei C-W. 2014. Restaurierte und rekonstruierte Zeichen: symbole und Baudenkmalpflege. Zeitschrift Für Semiotik. 36:125-150.
   Google Scholar
• Riley H. 2004. Perceptual Modes, Semiotic Codes, Social Mores: A Contribution towards a Social Semiotics of Drawing. Visual Communication. 3:294-315. doi:10.1177/1470357204045784
   Google Scholar
• Rockcastle S, Andersen M. 2013. Celebrating Contrast and Daylight Variability in Contemporary Architectural Design: A Typological Approach. Krakow (Poland):
   Google Scholar
• Roston T. 2015. Illuminating the Plight of Endangered Species, at the Empire State Building. New York Times [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/31/movies/illuminating-the-plight-of-endangered-species-at-the-empire-state-building.html?smid=pin-share.
   Google Scholar
• Rozot N, Peón-Veiga A. 2010. Drawing Light: A Graphical Investigation of Light, Space, and Time in Lighting Design. Parsons Journal for Information Mapping. 2:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby I, Ruby A, Ursprung P. 2004. Images. In A Picture Book of Architecture. München (Germany): Prestel.
   Google Scholar
• Ruxton I 2011. The meaning of light – towards a taxonomy of illuminatory semiotics. In: PLDC 3rd Global Lighting Design Conference. Madrid (Spain): Via Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski P. 2017. The Semiotics of Light and Shadows. In Modern Visual Arts and Weimar Cinema. London (UK): Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon D. 2014. Fluorescent architecture, or, Dan Flavin at the supermarket. The Journal of Architecture. 19:949-74. doi:10.1080/13602365.2014.987532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussure FD. 1969. Course in General Linguistics. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2008. The use of images in architectural lighting. ERCO Lichtbericht. 86:12-15.
   Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2013. Tutorial: rationale, Concepts, and Techniques for Lighting Vertical Surfaces. Leukos. 9:223-243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2014. Corporate lighting: methods and techniques of architectural lighting for brand communication.
   Google Scholar
• Schielke T. 2015. Influence of Lighting Design on Marketing Communication. LEUKOS. 11:109-124. doi:10.1080/15502724.2015.1020949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schielke T 2016. From Productivism to Scenography: the Relighting of Norman Foster’s Hongkong and Shanghai Bank. ArchDaily [accessed 2016 Jul 06]. Available from: http://www.archdaily.com/790877/from-productivism-to-scenography-the-relighting-of-norman-fosters-hongkong-and-shanghai-bank.
   Google Scholar
• Schivelbusch W. 1995. Disenchanted Night: the Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuer M 2017. Belgium’s Lavish Energy Use Sheds Light on More Than Just Its Roads. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher P. 2011. The Autopoiesis of architecture. In A new framework for architecture. Vol. I. Wiley: Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton R. 1979. The Aesthetics of Architecture. London (UK): Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Snøhetta. 2009. Snøhetta Works. Zurich (Switzerland): Lars Müller Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Speaks A. 2018. Autism speaks. Light it up blue for greater understanding + acceptance. Autism Speaks [Internet]. Available from: https://www.autismspeaks.org/liub.
   Google Scholar
• Squires N 2017. Romance of Rome under assault from ugly LED lighting, campaigners say. The Telegraph [accessed 2017 Dec 13]. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/02/romance-rome-assault-ugly-led-lighting-campaigners-say/.
   Google Scholar
• Tanizaki J. 1977. In praise of shadows. Sedgwick (TN): Leete’s Island Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tj C. 2017. Mapping the Edison Bulbs of Brooklyn. CityLab [accessed 2017 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.citylab.com/design/2017/10/mapping-the-edison-bulbs-of-brooklyn/543738/.
   Google Scholar
• Tschertov L 2006. Stilistik und architektonischer Kode - eine semiotische Untersuchung. In: Stil als Zeichen. Funktionen - Brüche - Inszenierungen. Beiträge des 11. Internationalen Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Semiotik. Frankfurt an der Oder (Germany): Universität Viadrina.
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich AV. 2014. Architektur - Zeichen - Medium: eine Verhältnisbestimmung am Beispiel gebauter Zitate. Zeitschrift Für Semiotik. 36:77-94.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA. 2001. Psychological Processes Influencing Lighting Quality. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society. 30:124-40. doi:10.1080/00994480.2001.10748341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturi R, Scott Brown D, Izenour S. 1977. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner KW. 2017. Jil Sander. Present tense. München (Germany): Prestel.
   Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh R, Fuller JM. 2015. An introduction to sociolinguistics. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Fund for Nature. 2018. Earth Hour. Earth Hour [accessed 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.earthhour.org.
   Google Scholar