Impact of Illumination Correlated Color Temperature, Background Lightness, and Painting Color Content on Color Appearance and Appreciation of Paintings

References

• Afremov L. 2014. Leonid afremov online gallery. www.afremov.com
   Google Scholar
• Ajmat R, Sandoval J, Arana Sema F, O’Donell B, Gor S, Alonso H. 2011. Lighting design in museums: exhibition vs. preservation. WIT Trans Built Environ. 118:195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Alf EF, Grossberg JM. 1979. The geometric mean: confidence limits and significance tests. Percept Psychophys. 26:419–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalhal JA, Linhares JMM, Nascimento SMC, Regalo MH, Leite MCVP (2005). Estimating the best illuminants for appreciation of art paintings. In Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Color Association, Granada, Spain, 8-13 May 2005, Edited by Nieves JL, Hernández-Andrés J, 2 Vols. and a CD-ROM (Granada, Spain: Comité Español Del Color, 2005). ISBN 84-609-5163-4, and 84, pp. 383–86.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HS, Chou CJ, Luo HW, Luo MR. 2016. Museum lighting environment: designing a perception zone map and emotional response models. Light Res Technol. 48:589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIE13.3-1995. 1995. Method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties of light sources. Vienna (Austria): CIE.
   Google Scholar
• CIE157-2004. 2004. Control of damage to museum objects by optical radiation. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No. 15:2004; p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2000. A proposal to reduce the exposure to light of museum objects without reducing illuminance or the level of visual satisfaction of museum visitors. J Am Inst Conserv. 39:229–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2007. Light for art’s sake. Lighting for Artworks and Museum Displays.Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• David A, Fini PT, Houser KW, Ohno Y, Royer MP, Smet KAG, Wei M, Whitehead L. 2015. Development of the IES method for evaluating the color rendition of light sources. Opt Express. 23:15888–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf T, Dessouky M, Müller HFO. 2014. Sustainable lighting of museum buildings. Renew Energy. 67:30–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druzik JR, Michalski SW. 2012. Guidelines for selecting solid-state lighting for museums.:  Canadian Conservation Institute (and Getty Conservation Institute). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3347.2080
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD, Reniff L. 1995. Time course of chromatic adaptation for color appearance judgments. J Opt Soc Am. 12:824–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltrin F, Hanselaer P, Leccese F, Smet K (2017). Analysis of painted artworks’ color appearance under various lighting settings. In Proc. of IEEE 2017—17th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, (Milan, Italy, 6-9 June 2017), pp. 1027–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fördergemeinschaft Gutes Licht. 2012. Good lighting for museums, galleries and exhibitions. Inf Light Appl. 18.p. 48
   Google Scholar
• Garside D, Curran K, Korenberg C, MacDonald L, Teunissen K, Robson S. 2017. How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums. J Inst Conserv. 40:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IES. 2015. IES-TM-30-15: method for evaluating light source color rendition. New York (NY): The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara S. 1972. Test for color-blindness (24 plates). Tokyo (Japan): Kanehara Shuppan Co.
   Google Scholar
• Leccese F, Salvadori G, Feltrin, Morozzi R, Nieri P. 2018. Study on the suitable lighting design of Beato Angelico’s artworks displayed at the National Museum of San Matteo in Pisa (Italy). IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 364:12095.
   Google Scholar
• Luo HW, Chou CJ, Luo MR. 2013. Using LED technology to build up museum lighting environment. In AIC conference. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK); p. 1757–60.
   Google Scholar
• Melgosa M, García PA, Gómez-Robledo L, Shamey R, Hinks D, Cui G, Luo MR. 2011. Notes on the application of the standardized residual sum of squares index for the assessment of intra- and inter-observer variability in color-difference experiments. J Opt Soc Am. 28:949–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento SMC, Masuda O. 2014. Best lighting for visual appreciation of artistic paintings - Experiments with real paintings and real illumination. J Opt Soc Am. 31:A214–A219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccablotto G, Aghemo C, Pellegrino A, Iacomussi P, Radis M. 2015. Study on conservation aspects using LED technology for museum lighting. Energy Procedia. 78:1347–52.
   Google Scholar
• Pinilla SM, Vàsquez D, Fernàndez-Balbuena AA, Muro C, Muñoz J. 2016. Spectral damage model for lighted museum paintings: oil, acrylic and gauche. J Cult Herit. 22:931–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto P, Linhares JMM, Carvalhal J, Nascimento SMC. 2006. Psychophysical estimation of the best illumination for appreciation of Renaissance paintings. Vis Neurosci. 23:669–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto P, Linhares JMM, Nascimento SMC. 2008. Correlated color temperature preferred by observers for illumination of artistic paintings. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 25:623–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Bierman A. 2014. Comparison of a solid-state luminaire to Tungsten-Halogen lamps for displaying museum objects. J Am Inst Conserv. 53:33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanda J, Csuti P, Szabó F. 2015. Colour fidelity for picture gallery illumination, Part 1: determining the optimum light-emitting diode spectrum. Light Res Technol. 47:513–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffé H. 1952. An analysis of variance for paired comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc. 47:381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuello M, Abramov I, Gordon J, Weintraub S. 2004a. Museum lighting: why are some illuminants preferred? J Opt Soc Am Opt Image Sci Vis. 21:306–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuello M, Abramov I, Gordon J, Weintraub S. 2004b. Museum lighting: optimizing the illuminant. Color Res Appl. 29:121–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet K, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2014. Chromaticity of unique white in object mode. Opt Express. 22:25830–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KA, Zhai Q, Luo MR, Hanselaer P. 2017a. Study of chromatic adaptation using memory color matches, Part II: colored illuminants. Opt Express. 25:8350–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Ryckaert WR, Pointer MR, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2012. A memory colour quality metric for white light sources. Energy Build. 49:216–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Zhai Q, Luo MR, Hanselaer P. 2017b. Study of chromatic adaptation using memory color matches, Part I: neutral illuminants. Opt Express. 25:7732–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó F, Kéri R, Csuti P (2017). The preferred conditions of LED lighting for fine art paintings : the influence of illuminance level and correlated colour temperature. In 1st International Museum Lighting Symposium, (London), pp. 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson G. 1986. The museum environment. London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub S. 2010. Using risk assessment tools to evaluate the use of LEDs for the illumination of light-sensitive collections comparison of relative damage potential. Am Inst Conserv News. 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa N, Fujiwaea T, Miyashita T (2013). A study on the appearance of paintings in the museum under violet and blue LED. In CIE Centenary Conference - Toward a New Century of Light, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai Q, Luo MR. 2018. Study of chromatic adaptation via neutral white matches on different viewing media. Opt Express. 26:7724–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai QY, Luo MR, Liu XY. 2015. The impact of illuminance and colour temperature on viewing fine art paintings under LED lighting. Light Res Technol. 47:795–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai QY, Luo MR, Liu XY. 2016. The impact of LED lighting parameters on viewing fine art paintings. Light Res Technol. 48:711–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar