Subjective Assessments of Lighting Quality: A Measurement Review

References

• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2014. Guide to protocols for describing lighting. Vienna (Austria): CIE. Publication No: CIE 213:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG. 2006. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 332:1080–1080. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aries MBC, Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 2010. Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. J Environ Psychol. 30:533–41. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk S, Tyrrell R. 2011. The Accuracy of Drivers’ Judgments of the Effects of Headlight Glare: Are We Really Blinded by the Light?. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, June 27-30, Olympic Valley — Lake Tahoe, California. Iowa City, IA: Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, 2011:510–517.
   Google Scholar
• Borisuit A, Linhart F, Scartezzini J-L, Munch M. 2014. Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood. Light Res. 1–18. doi:10.1177/1477153514531518
   Google Scholar
• Boyce P, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones CC, Heerwagen J, Myer M, Hunter CM. 2006. Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments. Light Res Technol. 38:191–223.  doi:10.1191/1365782806lrt161oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2014. Human factors in lighting. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough JD, Brons JA, Qi R, Rea MS. 2008. Predicting discomfort glare from outdoor lighting installations. Light Res Technol. 40:225–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen J, Wienold J 2004. ECCO-build Report ECCO-DBUR-0303-01 Monitoring Procedure for assessment of user reaction to glare. October:1–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 52:281–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer JB. 1967. Visual perception in road traffic and the field of vision of the motorist. In Public Lighting.  Edited by JB de Boer. Eindhoven (The Netherlands): Philips Technical Library.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis R. 2012. Scale development: theory and applications. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Durak A, Camgöz Olguntürk N, Yener C, Güvenç D, Gürçinar Y. 2007. Impact of lighting arrangements and illuminances on different impressions of a room. Build Environ. 42:3476–82. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund NH, Boyce PR 1996. The development of a reliable, valid, and simple office lighting survey. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 25:25
   Google Scholar
• Flynn J, Hendrick C, Spencer TOM. 1979. A guide to the methodology procedures for measuring subjective impressions in lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 1979;8:95-110.). J Illum Eng Soc. 8:95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2015. Research Note : uncertainty in subjective evaluation of discomfort glare. Light Res Technol. 47:379–83. doi:10.1177/1477153515574985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2018. Correspondence: New methods for the evaluation of discomfort glare. Light Res Technol. 50:489–491.doi:10.1177/1477153518773577
   Google Scholar
• Gentile N, Dubois M, Osterhaus W, Stoffer S, Naves C, Amorim D, Geisler-Moroder D, Jakobiak R. 2016. A toolbox to evaluate non-residential lighting and daylighting retrofit in practice. Energy Build. 123:151–61. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haans A. 2014. The natural preference in people’s appraisal of light. J Environ Psychol. 39:51–61. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirning MB, Isoardi GL, Coyne S, Garcia Hansen VR, Cowling I. 2013. Post occupancy evaluations relating to discomfort glare: A study of green buildings in Brisbane. Build Environ. 59:349–57. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG. 1972. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Appl Ergon. 3:206–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys MA, Nicol JF. 2007. Self-Assessed Productivity and the Office Environment. ASHRAE Trans. 113:606–16.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 1999. Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings. Galve (Sweden): Centre for Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2016. Monitoring protocol for lighting and daylighting retrofits. Stuttgart (Germany): Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata T, Shukuya M, Somekawa N, Kimura K. 1992. Experimental study on discomfort glare caused by windows. J Archit Plan Environ Eng. 432:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF. 2015. A concept for predicting occupants’ long-term visual comfort within daylit spaces. Leukos. 2724:1–18. doi:10.1080/15502724.2015.1090880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen L, Heiselberg P, Bryn I, Johra H. 2015. Verification of simple illuminance based measures for indication of discomfort glare from windows. Build Environ. 92:615–26. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Altomonte S, Wilson R, Tregenza PR. 2017. Temporal effects on glare response from daylight. Build Environ. 113:49–64. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Fotios S, Altomonte S. 2017. Discomfort glare evaluation: the influence of anchor bias in luminance adjustments. Light Res Technol. 1–16. doi:10.1177/1477153517734280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Fotios S, Altomonte S. 2018. Order effects when using Hopkinson’s multiple criterion scale of discomfort due to glare. Build Environ. 136:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. 1986. A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York (NY): Methuen & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mahić A, Galicinao K, Van Den Wymelenberg K. 2017. A pilot daylighting field study: testing the usefulness of laboratory-derived luminance-based metrics for building design and control. Build Environ. 113:78–91. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manav B, Yener C. 1999. Effects of different lighting arrangements on space perception. Archit Sci Rev. 42:43–47.  doi:10.1080/00038628.1999.9696847
   Google Scholar
• Newsham G, Brand J, Donelly C, Veitch JA, Aries M, Charles K. 2009. Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: a field study. Build Res Inf. 37:129–47. doi:10.1080/09613210802710298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus W, Bailey IL 1992. Large area glare sources and their effect on discomfort and visual performance at computer work stations. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 4-9 October. Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez RG, Garretón JAY, Pattini AE. 2015. Glare and cognitive performance in screen work in the presence of sunlight. Light Res Technol. 1477153515577851. doi:10.1177/1477153515577851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez RG, Yamín Garretón JA, Pattini AE. 2017. An epidemiological approach to daylight discomfort glare. Build Environ. 113:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Syal M, Grady SC, Korkmaz S. 2010. Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. Am J Public Health. 100:1665–68 [accessed 2018 Jan 19]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20634460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tralau B, Dehoff P, Schierz C. 2009. Introduction of the ergonomic Lighting Indicator as an objective measure for lighting quality. In: Experiencing Light 2009 - International Conference on the Effects of Light on Wellbeing. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2007. View and discomfort glare from windows. Light Res Technol. 39:185–98. doi:10.1177/1365782807077193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg K. 2014. Visual comfort, discomfort glare, and occupant fenestration control: Developing a research agenda. Leukos. 10:207–21. doi:10.1080/15502724.2014.939004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg K, Inanici M. 2014. A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. Leukos. 10:145–64. doi:10.1080/15502724.2014.881720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Wymelenberg K, Inanici M. 2016. Evaluating a new suite of luminance-based design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. Leukos. 12:113–38. doi:10.1080/15502724.2015.1062392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Charles KE, Farley KMJ, Newsham GR. 2007. A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. J Environ Psychol. 27:177–89. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Gifford R. 1996. Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood and social behaviour. Environ Behav. 28:446–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR 1996. Determinants of lighting quality II: research and Recommendations. In: Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Toronto, Canada. p. 58. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0169
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR. 2000. Exercised control, lighting choices, and energy use: an office simulation experiment. J Environ Psychol. 20:219–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Mancini S, Arsenault CD. 2010. Lighting and office renovation effects on employee and organizational well-being. Ottowa (Canada): National Research Council of Canada. doi:10.4224/2037/4532
   Google Scholar
• Velds M. 2002. User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms. Sol Energy. 73:95–103. doi:10.1016/S0038-092X(02)00037-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy Build. 38:743–57. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar