Minimum Daylight Autonomy: A New Concept to Link Daylight Dynamic Metrics with Daylight Factors

References

• Acosta I, Campano MA, Molina JF. 2016. Window design in architecture: analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Appl Energy. 168:493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Campano MA, Molina JF. 2017. Analysis of circadian stimulus and visual comfort provided by window design in architecture. Int J Eng Technol. 9(3):1793–8236.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Munoz C, Campano MA, Navarro J. 2015a. Analysis of daylight factors and energy saving allowed by windows under overcast sky conditions. Renewable Energy. 77:194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Munoz CM, Esquivias PM, Rangel D, Navarro J. 2015b. Analysis of the accuracy of the sky component calculation in daylighting simulation programs. Sol Energy. 119:54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. 2014. Lighting design in courtyards: predictive method of daylight factors under overcast sky conditions. Renewable Energy. 71:243–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ, Esquivias P. 2012. Daylighting design with lightscoop skylights: towards an optimization of proportion and spacing under overcast sky conditions. Energy Build. 49:394–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Varela C, Molina JF, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. 2018. Energy efficiency and lighting design in courtyards and atriums: A predictive method for daylight factors. Appl Energy. 211:1216–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahadi AA, Saghafi MR, Tahbaz M. 2017. The study of effective factors in daylight performance of light-wells with dynamic daylight metrics in residential buildings. Sol Energy. 155:679–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Obaidi KM, Ismail MA, Rahman AMA. 2015. Assessing the allowable daylight illuminance from skylights in single-storey buildings in Malaysia: a review. Leukos. 6:236–48.
   Google Scholar
• Armaroli N, Balzani V. 2011. Towards an electricity-powered world. Energy Environ Sci. 4:3193–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association Suisse des Electriciens. 1989. Éclairage intérieur par la lumière du jour. Zurich (Switzerland): Association Suisse Des Electriciens. Swiss Norm SN 418911.
   Google Scholar
• Baker NV, Fanchiotti A, Steemers K. 1993. Daylighting in architecture: A European reference book. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi U, Anaraki HK. 2015. Analysis of the impacts of Light Shelves on the useful daylight illuminance in office buildings in toronto. Energy Procedia. 78:1793–98.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce PR, Smet KAG. 2013. LRT symposium “Better metrics for better lighting” – a summary. Light Res Technol. 46:619–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcagni B, Paroncini M. 2004. Daylight factor prediction in atria building designs. Sol Energy. 76:669–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campano MA, Acosta I, Fernández-Agüera J, Sendra JJ. 2014. Towards finding the optimal location of a ventilation inlet in a roof monitor skylight, using visual and thermal performance criteria, for dwellings in a Mediterranean climate. J Build Perform Simul. 8(4):226–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chel A, Tiwari GN, Singh HN. 2010. A modified model for estimation of daylight factor for skylight integrated with dome roof structure of mud-house in New Delhi (India). Appl Energy. 87:3037–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow SKH, Li DHW, Lee EWM, Lam JC. 2013. Analysis and prediction of daylighting and energy performance in atrium spaces using daylight-linked lighting controls. Appl Energy. 112:1016–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIE. 2003. Spatial distribution of daylight - CIE standard general sky, commission internationale de l’Éclairage. Vienna (Austria): CIE S 011/E: 2003.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2011. International lighting vocabulary, Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. Vienna (Austria): CIE S 017: 2011.
   Google Scholar
• De la Flor FJS, Dominguez SA, Félix JLM, Falcón RG. 2008. Climatic zoning and its application to Spanish building energy performance regulations. Energy Build. 40:1984–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro V, Mele M, Marinelli V. 2012. Analysis of sky luminance experimental data and comparison with calculation methods. Energy. 37:287–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IESNA. 2000. Lighting Handbook. 9th ed. New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• IESNA. 2013. IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Karayel M, Navvab M, Ne’eman E, Selkowitz S. 1984. Zenith luminance and sky luminance distributions for daylighting calculations. Energy Build. 6(3):283–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanasmaz T, Grobe LO, Bauer C, Krehel M, Wittkopf S. 2016. Three approaches to optimize optical properties and size of a South-facing window for spatial Daylight Autonomy. Build Environ. 102:243–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C-S, Chung S-J. 2011. Daylighting simulation as an architectural design process in museums installed with toplights. Build Environ. 46:210–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindienst S, Bodart M, Andersen M. 2013. Graphical representation of climate-based daylight performance to support architectural design. Leukos. 5:39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lam JC, Li DHW, Cheung SO. 2003. An analysis of electricity end-use in air-conditioned office buildings in Hong Kong. Build Environ. 38(3):493–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm LO. 1981. A new analytic expression for the equation of time. Sol Energy. 26(5):465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2012. EnergyPlus engineering reference. The reference to EnergyPlus Calculations, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Technical report. 1278.
   Google Scholar
• León AL, Suárez R, Bustamante P, Campano MA, Moreno D. 2017. Design and performance of test cells as an energy evaluation model of facades in a mediterranean building area. Energies. 10(11):1816 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie RP, Radetsky LC, Smith AM. 2012. Conceptual design metrics for daylighting. Light Res Technol. 44:277–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie RP, Raghavan R, Howlett O, Eaton C. 2005. The potential of simplified concepts for daylight harvesting. Light Res Technol. 37:21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Lam JC. 2003. An analysis of all-sky zenith luminance data for Hong Kong. Build Environ. 38:739–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangkuto RA, Rohmah M, Asri AD. 2016. Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: A case study of buildings in the tropics. Appl Energy. 164:211–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, Christoffersen J. 2012. Daylighting metrics, is there a relationship between Useful Daylight Illuminance and Daylight Glare Probability? First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference, Loughborough, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus J. 1988. Astronomical Formulae for Calculators. Richmond (TX): Willman-Bell.
   Google Scholar
• Moon P, Spencer DE. 1942. Illumination from a Non-Uniform Sky. Illum Eng. 37:707–26.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz CM, Esquivias PM, Rangel D, Acosta I, Navarro J. 2014. Climate-based daylighting analysis for the effects of location, orientation and obstruction. Light Res Technol. 46:268–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2005. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Light Res Technol. 37(1):41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2006. Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy Build. 38:905–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Oki M, Hayashi Y. 1985. Luminance distribution of intermediate sky. J Light Visual Environ. 9(1):6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Seals R, Michalsky J. 1993. All-weather model for sky luminance distribution - preliminary configuration and validation. Sol Energy. 50(3):235–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF. 2014. Daylighting Handbook I. Boston (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos. 3(1):7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O. 2001. Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy Build. 33(7):683–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert W, Lootens C, Geldof J, Hanselaer P. 2010. Criteria for energy efficient lighting in buildings. Energy Build. 42(3):341–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler A, Gopinathan KK. 2004. Relation between zenith luminances for cloudless, partly cloudy and overcast skies at Madrid. Energy Convers Manage. 45:2583–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoutteghem L, Skarning GCJ, Hviid CA, Svendsen S. 2015. Impact of façade window design on energy, daylighting and thermal comfort in nearly zero-energy houses. Energy Build. 102:149–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verso VRM, Mihaylov G, Pellegrino A, Pellerey F. 2017. Estimation of the daylight amount and the energy demand for lighting for the early design stages: definition of a set of mathematical models. Energy Build. 155:151–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar