Post-occupancy Evaluation Study of the Impact of Daylighting and Electric Lighting in the Workplace

References

• Allan AC, Garcia-Hansen V, Isoardi G, Smith SS. 2019. Subjective assessments of lighting quality: A measurement review. Leukos. 1–12. doi:10.1080/15502724.2018.1531017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen M. 2015. Unweaving the human response in daylighting design. Build Environ. 91:101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. 2002. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science. 295(5557):1070–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisuit A, Scartezzini J-L, Thanachareonkit A. 2010. Visual discomfort and glare rating assessment of integrated daylighting and electric lighting systems using hdr imaging techniques. Archit Sci Rev. 53(4):359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J-H, Loftness V, Aziz A. 2012. Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future ieq standards and guidelines. Energy Build. 46:167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clear RD. 2013. Discomfort glare: what do we actually know? Light Res Technol. 45(2):141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JK, Gunderson DE. 2015. Understanding high performance buildings: the link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviors, occupant comfort and environmental satisfaction. Build Environ. 84:114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis FV. 2007, December. Evaluation of lighting controls in office buildings. Proc 6th WSEAS Int Conf Circuits, Syst, Electron, Control Signal Process.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile N, Laike T, Dubois M-C. 2016. Lighting control systems in individual offices rooms at high latitude: measurements of electricity savings and occupants’ satisfaction. Solar Energy. 127:113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holick MF. 2004. Sunlight and vitamin d for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 80(6):1678S–1688S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hraska J. 2015. Chronobiological aspects of green buildings daylighting. Renewable Energy. 73:109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua Y, Oswald A, Yang X. 2011. Effectiveness of daylighting design and occupant visual satisfaction in a leed gold laboratory building. Build Environ. 46(1):54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang T, Kim JT. 2011. Effects of indoor lighting on occupants’ visual comfort and eye health in a green building. Indoor Built Environ. 20(1):75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S. 2003. Studies of the effect of comfort and air quality on staff productivity- the indoor health and productivity project. Washington, DC: National Science and Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Leder S, Newsham GR, Veitch JA, Mancini S, Charles KE. 2016. Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: A new analysis. Build Res Infor. 44(1):34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeGates TA, Fernandez DC, Hattar S. 2014. Light as a central modulator of circadian rhythms, sleep and affect. Nat Rev Neurosci. 15(7):443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim G-H, Hirning MB, Keumala N, Ghafar NA. 2017. Daylight performance and users’ visual appraisal for green building offices in malaysia. Energy Build. 141:175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockley SW, Brainard GC, Czeisler CA. 2003. High sensitivity of the human circadian melatonin rhythm to resetting by short wavelength light. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 88(9):4502–4505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftness V, Hartkopf V, Gurtekin B, Hua Y, Qu M, Snyder M, Gu Y, Yang X. 2005. Building investment decision support (bids™). Flexible Infrastructures & Systems Integration for Sustainable Commercial Buildings and Productive Organizations, AIA Pilot Report on University Research (2005): 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mason CH, Perreault WD Jr. 1991. Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. J Marketing Res. 268–280. doi:10.1177/002224379102800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerbeek B, Te Kulve M, Gritti T, Aarts M, van Loenen E, Aarts E. 2014. Building automation and perceived control: a field study on motorized exterior blinds in Dutch offices. Build Environ. 79:66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies G, Wherrett J. 2005. Windows in the workplace: examining issues of environmental sustainability and occupant comfort in the selection of multi-glazed windows. Energy Build. 37(6):623–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham G, Arsenault C, Veitch J, Tosco AM, Duval C. 2005. Task lighting effects on office worker satisfaction and performance, and energy efficiency. Leukos. 1(4):7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham G, Veitch J, Arsenault C, Duval C, 2004, July. Effect of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance. Proceedings of the IESNA annual conference; 2004. Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Park B-C, Chang J-H, Kim Y-S, Jeong J-W, Choi A-S. 2010. A study on the subjective response for corrected colour temperature conditions in a specific space. Indoor Built Environ. 19(6):623–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson C, Wienold J, Bodart M. 2018. Review of factors influencing discomfort glare perception from daylight. Leukos. 14(3):111–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser W. 2002. Learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakellaris IA, Saraga DE, Mandin C, Roda C, Fossati S, De Kluizenaar Y, Carrer P, Dimitroulopoulou S, Mihucz VG, Szigeti T. 2016. Perceived indoor environment and occupants’ comfort in european “modern” office buildings: the officair study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(5):444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsul B, Sia C, Ng Y, Karmegan K. 2013. Effects of light’s colour temperatures on visual comfort level, task performances, and alertness among students. Am J Public Health Res. 1(7):159–165.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. EPA’s 2008 report on the environment. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer JC. 2008. Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Archit Sci Rev. 51(2):97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Wacker M, Holick MF. 2013. Sunlight and vitamin D: a global perspective for health. Dermato-Endocrinology. 5(1):51–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winchip SM. 2011. Sustainable design for interior environments second edition. London, UK: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar