Impact of Color-Matching Primaries on Observer Matching: Part I – Accuracy

References

• Ábrahám G, Körösi H, Schanda J, Shapiro AG, Wenzel K. 1995. Anomalies in additive colour matches. Color Res Appl. 20(4):235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Alfvin RL, Fairchild MD. 1997. Observer variability in metameric color matches using color reproduction media. Color Res Appl. 22(3):174–188.
   Google Scholar
• Asano Y. 2015. Individual colorimetric observers for personalized color imaging. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD. 2020. Categorical observers for metamerism. Color Res Appl. 45(4):576–585.
   Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L. 2016a. Individual colorimetric observer model. PLoS One. 11(2):e0145671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L, Morvan P. 2016b. Color matching experiment for highlighting interobserver variability. Color Res Appl. 41(5):530–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell KT, Buchsbaum G. 1988. The effect of spatial and chromatic parameters on chromatic induction. Color Res Appl. 13(3):166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun KM, Fairchild MD, Alessi PJ. 1996. Viewing techniques for cross‐media image comparisons. Color Res Appl. 21(1):6–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIE. 1986. Colorimetry. 2nd ed. Publication CIE. 15.2-1986. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2004. Colorimetry. 3rd ed. Technical Report. Publication CIE. 015-2004. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2006. Fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes - part I. CIE 170-1:2006. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2011. CIE international lighting vocabulary. CIE. S 017/E:2011. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2014. Chromaticity difference specification for light sources. CIE. TN001:2014. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• CIE. 2018. Colorimetry. 4th ed. CIE. 015:2018. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna. doi:https://doi.org/10.25039/TR.015.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Csuti P, Schanda J. 2008. Colour matching experiments with RGB-LEDs. Color Res Appl. 33(2):108–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csuti P, Schanda J. 2010. A better description of metameric experience of LED clusters. Light Eng. 18(1):44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttle C. 2008. Lighting by Design, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• David A, Sahlhoff D, Wisser M. 2019. Human perception of light chromaticity: short-wavelength effects in spectra with low circadian stimulation, and broader implications for general LED sources. Opt. Express 27(22):31553–31566.
   Google Scholar
• Ezquerro JM, Zoido JM, Perales E, Martínez-Verdú F, Melgosa M. 2008. In: CGIV 2008 / MCS / 08 4th European Conference on Color in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision; 10th International Symposium on Multispectral Color Science: final program and proceedings [Electronic resource]. Springfield, VA: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD. 1989. A novel method for the determination of color matching functions. Color Res Appl. 14(3):122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A, Miles J, Field Z. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Flecy L, Smet KAG. 2015. RGB kleurmatching met nauwbandige en breedbandige primairen. Thesis. KU Leuven, Campus Gent.
   Google Scholar
• Grassmann HG. 1854. XXXVII. On the theory of compound colours. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 7(45):254–264.
   Google Scholar
• Guild J. 1931. The colorimetric properties of the spectrum. Encycl Earth Sci Ser. 230:149–187.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G, Borbely J, Vichi A, Dumfahrt H, Renault P, Corcodel N, Pohlen B, Marada G, et al. 2009. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent. 37(SUPPL.1):40–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley SA, Fairchild MD. 2000. Quantifying mixed adaptation in cross-media color reproduction. In: Color and imaging conference. Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Vol. 2000, No. 1, pp. 305–310. Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Houser KW, Hu X. 2004. Visually matching daylight fluorescent lamplight with two primary sets†. Color Res Appl. 29(6):428–437.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Houser KW. 2006. Large-field color matching functions. Color Res Appl. 31(1):18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain N, Verma P, Mittal S, Mittal S, Singh AK, Munjal S. 2010. Gender based alteration in color perception. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 54(4):366–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Judd DB. 1951. Report of U.S. secretariat committee on colorimetry and artificial daylight. Proc 12th Sess CIE. 1951(1):11. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10016149511/en/
   Google Scholar
• Judd DB. 1961. A five-attribute system of describing visual appearance. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Katoh N, Nakabayashi K, Ito M, Ohno S. 1998. Effect of ambient light on color appearance of softcopy images: mixed chromatic adaptation for self-luminous displays. J Electron Imaging. 7(4):794–807.
   Google Scholar
• Krantz DH. 1975. Color measurement and color theory: I. Representation theorem for Grassmann structures. J Math Psychol. 12(3):283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuriki I. 2015. Effect of material perception on mode of color appearance. J Vis. 15(8):4.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M. 2020. Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.4. https://github.com/rvlenth/emmeans.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet K. 2019a. Pilot study on color matching accuracy using different primaries. Proceedings of the 29th CIE Session. Washington D.C., USA, June 14 – 22, 2019. p. 1010–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet K. 2019b. The impact of matching primary peak wavelength on color matching accuracy and observer variability. 27th Color and Imaging Conference. Paris, France. Final Program and Proceedings; Society for Imaging Science and Technology. pp. 220–224 (5).
   Google Scholar
• Long DL, Fairchild MD. 2014. Modeling observer variability and metamerism failure in electronic color displays. JIST. 58(3):304021–3040214. doi:https://doi.org/10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2014.58.3.030402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano RD, Palmer DA. 1969. Large-field color matching and adaptation. J Opt Soc Am. 59(4):463–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Hanselaer P, Teunissen K, Smet K. 2018. The influence of adapting field size on degree of chromatic adaptation. CIE 2018 Smart Lighting, Date: 2018/04/24-2018/04/28; Taipei.
   Google Scholar
• Ma S, Hanselaer P, Teunissen K, Smet KAG. 2019. Impact of the starting point chromaticity on memory color matching accuracy. Opt Express. 27(24):35308.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia KV. 2014. Multinormality, Mardia’s test of. Wiley statsref stat ref online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat01657.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch MJ, Fairchild MD. 2019. Modelling the effects of inter-observer variation on colour rendition. Lighting Res Technol. 51(1):37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimeroff I, Rosenblatt JR, Dannemiller MC. 1961. Variability of spectral tristimulus values. J Res Natl Bur Stand A Phys Chem. 65A(6):475–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.065A.050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• North AD, Fairchild MD. 1993. Measuring color-matching functions. Part 11. New data for assessing observer metamerism. Color Res Appl. 18(3):163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Kawashima Y, Oh S, Kwak Y. 2019. Visual evaluation of CIE 2015 cone fundamental-based 10° colour matching functions for lighting applications. Proc 29th CIE Sess. doi:https://doi.org/10.25039/x46.2019.OP69
   Google Scholar
• Oicherman B. 2007. Effects of colorimetric additivity failure and of observer metamerism on cross-media colourmatching. Thesis. The University of Leeds. Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Oicherman B, Luo MR, Rigg B, Robertson AR. 2008. Effect of observer metamerism on colour matching of display and surface colours. Color Res Appl. 33(5):346–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleari C, Pavesi M. 2008. Grassmann’s laws and individual color-matching functions for non-spectral primaries evaluated by maximum saturation technique in foveal vision. Color Res Appl. 33(4):271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton DP. 2004a. The properties of multiple CMF determinations using alternative primary sets part II: a data unification methodology. Color Res Appl. 29(6):438–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton DP. 2004b. The properties of multiple CMF determinations using alternative primary sets part I: evidence and modeling. Color Res Appl. 29(4):273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanath R. 2009. Minimizing observer metamerism in display systems. Color Res Appl. 34(5):391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich DC, Jalijali J. 1995. Effects of observer metamerism in the determination of human color-matching functions. Color Res Appl. 20(1):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A. 2011a. Identification and assignment of colorimetric observer categories and their applications in color and vision sciences. Université de Nantes. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00647246.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A. 2011b. Variability in color matching functions. Technical report. CIE. R1-54. Central Bureau of the CIE, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Autrusseau F, Viénot F, Le Callet P, Blondé L. 2011. From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers. J Opt Soc Am A. 28(10):2033.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Morvan P, Stauder J. 2010. Toward reducing observer metamerism in industrial applications: colorimetric observer categories and observer classification. In: 18th Color and Imaging Conference. Texas, USA. Vol. 2010. Society for Imaging Science and Technology; p. 307–313.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Blondé L, Le Callet P, Autrusseau F, Stauder J, Morvan P. 2009. Study of observer variability on modern display colorimetry: comparison of CIE 2006 model and 10° standard observer. The 11th Congress of the International Colour Association (AIC); Sydney, Australia: AIC.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro AG, Pokorny J, Smith VC. 1994. Rod contribution to large‐field color matching. Color Res Appl. 19(4):236–245.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw M, Fairchild M. 2002. Evaluating the 1931 CIE color-matching functions. Color Res Appl. 27(5):316–329.
   Google Scholar
• Shi C, Huang M, Liu Y, Li Z, Liu H. 2016. Study on observers’ categories based on color matching experiments. In: China Academic Conference on Printing & Packaging and Media Technology. Singapore: Springer. p. 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Smet KAG. 2018. Tutorial: the LuxPy Python toolbox for lighting and color science. LEUKOS. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2018.1518717
   Google Scholar
• Smet KAG, Deconinck G, Hanselaer P. 2014. Chromaticity of unique white in object mode. Opt Express. 22(21):25830–25841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speranskaya NI. 1959. Determination of spectrum color coordinates for twenty-seven normal observers. Opt Spectrosc. 7:424–428. [accessed 2020 Mar 6]. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10018424674/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles WS, Burch JM. 1955. Interim report to the commission internationale de l’Eclairage, Zurich, 1955, on the national physical laboratory’s investigation of colour-matching (1955). Opt Acta. 2(4):168–181.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles WS, Burch JM. 1959. N.P.L. Colour-matching investigation: final report (1958). Opt Acta Int J Opt. 6(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles WS, Wyszecki G. 1962. Field trials of color-mixture functions*. J Opt Soc Am. 52(1):58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockman A, Sharpe LT. 1999. Cone spectral sensitivities and color matching. In: Color Vision: From Genes to Perception., K. Gegenfurtner, and L. Sharper, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 53–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman A, Sharpe LT. 2000. The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Res. 40(13):1711–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1992a. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part III. Discussion (continued). Color Res Appl. 17(4):240–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1992b. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part I. Introduction. The visual colorimeter-spectroradiometer. experimental results. Color Res Appl. 17(2):79–122.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1992c. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part II. Discussion. Color Res Appl. 17(3):162–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1997. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part IV. Visual experiments with bright fields and both 10° and 1.3° field sizes William. Color Res Appl. 22(3):189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1998. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part VI. Improved weighting functions. Preliminary results. Color Res Appl. 23(4):226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1999. Spectral sensitivities of the normal human visual system, color-matching functions and their principles, and how and why the two sets should coincide. Color Res. Appl. 24:139–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6378(199904)24:2<139::AID-COL9>3.0.CO;2-O
   Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 2000. Suggested optimum primaries and gamut in color imaging. Color Res Appl. 25(2):148–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA, Fairman HS. 1998. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part V. Testing visually matching pairs of lights for possible rod participation on the Aguilar-Stiles model. Color Res Appl. 23(2):92–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos JJ. 1978. Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer. Color Res Appl. 3(3):125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wright WD. 1929. A re-determination of the trichromatic coefficients of the spectral colours. TransOpt Soc. 30(4):141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. 2000. Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulas. 2nd ed. London (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidi Q. 1986. Adaptation and color matching. Vision Res. 26(12):1925–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar