Improved Method for Evaluating and Specifying the Chromaticity of Light Sources

References

• Asano Y, Fairchild MD. 2020. Categorical observers for metamerism. Color Res Appl. 45(4):576–585. Online before print. doi:10.1002/col.22493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L. 2016. Individual colorimetric observer model. PLoS One. 11(2):e0145671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L, Morvan P. 2014. Multiple color matches to estimate human color vision sensitivities. In: Elmoataz A, Lezoray O, Nouboud F, and Mammass D, editors. Image and signal processing. ICISP 2014. Lecture notes in computer science. Vol. 8509. Cham: Springer. p. 18–25.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-07998-1_3#citeas
   Google Scholar
• Asano Y, Fairchild MD, Blondé L, Morvan P. 2016. Color matching experiment for highlighting interobserver variability. Color Res Appl. 41(5):530–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borbely A, Schanda J, Borbély Á, Schanda J. 2004. Colour matching using LEDs as primaries. Color Res Appl. 29(5):360–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill MH, Worthey JA. 2007. Color matching functions when one primary wavelength is changed. Color Res Appl. 32(1):22–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WR. 1952. The effect of field size and chromatic surroundings on colar discrimination. J Opt Soc Am. 42(11):837–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WR. 1957. Color discrimination of twelve observers. J Opt Soc Am. 47(2):137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WR, MacAdam DL. 1949. Visual sensitivities to combined chromaticity and luminance differences. J Opt Soc Am. 39(10):808–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. 2006. 170-1: fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes. Part 1. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. 2014. TN001:2014: chromaticity difference specification for light sources. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. 2015. 170-2: fundamental chromaticity diagram with phsysiological axes, Part 2: spectral luminous efficiency functions and chromaticity diagrams. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. 2018. CIE 015:2018: colorimetry. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Csuti P, Schanda J, Petluri R, McGroddy K, Harbers G. 2011. Improved color matching functions for better visual matching of LED sources. Proc 27th Sess. Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage; Sun City, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• David A, Sahlhoff D, Wisser M. 2019. Human perception of light chromaticity: short-wavelength effects in spectra with low circadian stimulation, and broader implications for general LED sources. Opt Express. 27(22):31553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David A, Smet KAG, Whitehead L. 2019. Methods for assessing quantity and quality of illumination. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 5(1):479–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikel EE, Burns GJ, Veitch JA, Mancini S, Newsham GR. 2014. Preferred chromaticity of color-tunable LED lighting. Leukos. 10(2):101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery KJ, Webster MA. 2019. Individual differences and their implications for color perception. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 30:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito T, Houser K. 2019. Models of colour quality over a wide range of spectral power distributions. Light Res Technol. 51(3):331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild MD. 2013. Color appearance models. 3rd ed. Chichester (United Kingdom): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Houser KW. 2006. Large-field color matching functions. Color Res Appl. 31(1):18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak Y, Ha H, Ohno Y. 2020. Vision experiment on perception of correlated color temperature. 5th CIE Symposium on Color and Visual Appearance. Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage; Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet KAG. 2019. The impact of matching primary peak wavelength on color matching accuracy and observer variability. Color Imaging Conf. doi:10.2352/.2169-2629.2019.27.39
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet KAG. 2021. Impact of color-matching primaries on observer matching: Part I – accuracy. LEUKOS. Online before print. doi:10.1080/15502724.2020.1864395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Hanselaer P, Smet KAG. 2021b. Impact of color matching primaries on observer matching: Part II – observer variability. LEUKOS. Online before print. doi:10.1080/15502724.2020.1864396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano RD, Palmer DA. 1968. Large-field color matching and adaptation. J Opt Soc Am. 58(12):1653–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAdam DL. 1942. Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. J Opt Soc Am. 32(5):247–274.
   Google Scholar
• MacAdam DL. 1971. Geodesic chromaticity diagram based on variances of color matching by 14 normal observers. Appl Opt. 10(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NEMA] National Electrical Manufacturers Association. 2017. ANSI/NEMA C78.377-2017 American national standard for electric lamps—specifications for the chromaticity of solid state lighting products. Rosslyn (VA): National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Oh S, Kwak Y, Ohno Y. 2020. Vision experiment II on perception of correlated colour temperature. Proc 5th CIE Symposium on Colour and Visual Appearance. Hong Kong: Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. doi:10.25039/x47.2020.OP02
   Google Scholar
• Ohno Y. 2014. Practical use and calculation of CCT and Duv. Leukos. 10(1):47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Kawashima Y, Oh S, Kwak Y. 2019. Visual evaluation of CIE 2015 cone fundamental-based 10° colour matching functions for lighting applications. Proc 29th CIE Session. Washington (DC): Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage. doi:10.25039/x46.2019.OP69.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Fein M. 2014. Vision experiment on acceptable and preferred white light chromaticity for lighting. Proc CIE 2014 Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. CIE x039:2014.:192-199.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno Y, Oh S. 2016. Vision Experiment II on white light chromaticity for lighting. Proc CIE lighting quality and energy efficiency. Melbourne (Australia). CIE x0422016.:175–184. Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton DP. 2004. The properties of multiple CMF determinations using alternative primary sets part II: a data unification methodology. Color Res Appl. 29(6):438–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Murdoch MJ, Fairchild MD. 2020. Observer metamerism: why do [mis] matches of neutral appear pinkish or greenish? Color and Imaging Conference 2020. Online Conference. Society for Imaging Science and Technology doi:10.2352/issn.2169-2629.2020.28.2.
   Google Scholar
• Rea MS, Freyssinier JP. 2013. White lighting. Color Res Appl. 38(2):82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson AR. 1968. Computation of correlated color temperature and distribution temperature. J Opt Soc Am. 58(11):1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer M. 2020. Real light source SPDs and color data for use in research. Figshare. Dataset. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12947240.v1.
   Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Wei M, Wilkerson A, Safranek S. 2020. Experimental validation of colour rendition specification criteria based on ANSI/IES TM-30-18. Light Res Technol. 52(3):323–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Wilkerson A, Wei M. 2018. Human perceptions of colour rendition at different chromaticities. Light Res Technol. 50(7):965–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer MP, Wilkerson A, Wei M, Houser K, Davis R. 2017. Human perceptions of colour rendition vary with average fidelity, average gamut, and gamut shape. Light Res Technol. 49(8):966–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet KAG. 2018. Two neutral white illumination loci based on unique white rating and degree of chromatic adaptation. Leukos. 14(2):55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockman A. 2019. Cone fundamentals and CIE standards. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 30:87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockman A, Sharpe LT. 2000. The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Res. 40(13):1711–1737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton WA. 1973. A system of photometry and colorimetry based directly on visual response. J Illum Eng Soc. 3(1):99–111.
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations. 2019. World population prospects 2019 [accessed 2021 Jun]. https://population.un.org/wpp/
   Google Scholar
• Vos JJ. 1978. Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer. Color Res Appl. 3(3):125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. 1982. Color science. Vol. 8. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar