Predicting Window View Preferences Using the Environmental Information Criteria

References

• Aries M, Veitch J, Newsham G. 2010. Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. J Environ Psychol. 30(4):533–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers E-J, Berk R, Bollen KA, Brembs B, Brown L, Camerer C, et al. 2018. Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2(1):6–10. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohanec M, Bratko I. 1994. Trading accuracy for simplicity in decision trees. Mach Learn. 15(3):223–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. 1992. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proc fifth annu workshop comput learn theory [Internet]. New York (NY, USA): Association for Computing Machinery; p. 144–152. [accessed 2020 Nov 23]. doi:10.1145/130385.130401.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. 1984. Classification and regression trees [Internet]. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge. doi:10.1201/9781315139470.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick J, Kalton G. 1996. Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res. 5(3):215–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks AM, Ottley KM, Arbuthnott KD, Sevigny P. 2017. Nature-related mood effects: season and type of nature contact. J Environ Psychol. 54:91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler DL, Biner PM. 1989. Effects of setting on window preferences and factors associated with those preferences. Environ Behav. 21(1):17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bzdok D, Altman N, Krzywinski M. 2018. Statistics versus machine learning. Nat Methods. 15:233–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung T, Schiavon S, Parkinson T, Li P, Brager G. 2019. Analysis of the accuracy on PMV – PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Build Environ. 153:205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davydenko M, Peetz J. 2017. Time grows on trees: the effect of nature settings on time perception. J Environ Psychol. 54:20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding C, He X. 2004. K-means clustering via principal component analysis. In: Twenty-First Int Conf Mach Learn - ICML 04 [Internet]. Banff (Alberta, Canada): ACM Press; p. 29. [accessed 2021 May 26]. doi:10.1145/1015330.1015408.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin KK, Simon RM. 2011. Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers. BMC Med Genomics. 4(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dogrusoy IT, Tureyen M. 2007. A field study on determination of preferences for windows in office environments. Build Environ. 42(10):3660–3668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 17037. 2018. Daylight in buildings. Brussels (Belgium): European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson CJ. 2009. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 40(5):532–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A, Hole GJ. 2011. How to design and report experiments. London (United Kingdom): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Field A, Miles J, Field Z. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. London (United Kingdom): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fotios S. 2019. Using category rating to evaluate the lit environment: is a meaningful opinion captured? LEUKOS. 15(2–3):127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham LT, Parkinson T, Schiavon S. 2021. Lessons learned from 20 years of CBE’s occupant surveys. Build Cities. 2(1):166–184.
   Google Scholar
• Granzier JJM, Valsecchi M. 2014. Variations in daylight as a contextual cue for estimating season, time of day, and weather conditions. J Vis. 14(1):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidotti R, Monreale A, Ruggieri S, Turini F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D. 2019. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput Surv. 51(5):1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadavi S, Kaplan R, Hunter MCR. 2015. Environmental affordances: a practical approach for design of nearby outdoor settings in urban residential areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 134:19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 143(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA, Wong MA. 1979. Algorithm AS 136: a K-Means clustering algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 28(1):100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson JC. 2013. Urban parks and green spaces in Singapore. Manag Leis. 18(3):213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Chang C, Lin C. 2010. A practical guide to support vector classification. Department of Computer Science: National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• IWBS. 2020. WELL building standard V2 pilot. [accessed 06 June 2022]. https://v2.wellcertified.com/en/v/light/feature/5
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. 1993. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landsc Urban Plan. 26(1):193–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. 2001. The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav. 33(4):507–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent M, Schiavon S. 2020. Evaluation of the effect of landscape distance seen in window views on visual satisfaction. Build Environ. 183:107160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent M, Parkinson T, Kim J, Schiavon S. 2021. A data-driven analysis of occupant workspace dissatisfaction. Build Environ. 205:108270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Schiavon S, Brager G. 2018. Personal comfort models – a new paradigm in thermal comfort for occupant-centric environmental control. Build Environ. 132:114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Kent M, Kral K, Dogan T. 2022. Seemo: a new tool for early design window view satisfaction evaluation in residential buildings. Build Environ. 214:108909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko WH, Kent MG, Schiavon S, Levitt B, Betti G. 2022. A window view quality assessment framework. LEUKOS. 18(3):268–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsiantis SB. 2007. Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica. 31(3):249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA, Alwin DF. 1987. An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opin Q. 51(2):201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Samuelson H. 2020. A new method for visualizing and evaluating views in architectural design. Dev Built Environ. 1:100005.
   Google Scholar
• Lindal PJ, Hartig T. 2013. Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. J Environ Psychol. 33:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindal PJ, Hartig T. 2015. Effects of urban street vegetation on judgments of restoration likelihood. Urban For Urban Green. 14(2):200–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus TA. 1967. The function of windows— a reappraisal. Build Sci. 2(2):97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Masoudinejad S, Hartig T. 2018. Window view to the sky as a restorative resource for residents in densely populated cities. Environ Behav. 52(4):401–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer FS, Frantz CM, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Dolliver K. 2009. Why is nature beneficial?: the role of connectedness to nature. Environ Behav. 41(5):607–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch WS, Pitts W. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys. 5(4):115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Metz CE. 1978. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 8(4):283–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers J. 1986. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Mach Learn. 4:227–243.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in quantifying judgements. Hove and London (United Kingdom): Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raschka S. 2020. Model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning. ArXiv181112808 Cs Stat. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Salesses P, Schechtner K, Hidalgo CA. 2013. The collaborative image of the city: mapping the inequality of urban perception. PLOS ONE. 8(7):e68400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker IH. 2021. Machine learning: algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2(3):160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SLL. 2014. Lighting guide 10: daylighting - A guide for designers. London (United Kingdom): Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE).
   Google Scholar
• Sokolova M, Japkowicz N, Szpakowicz S. 2006. Beyond accuracy, F-score and ROC: a family of discriminant measures for performance evaluation. In: Sattar A, Kang B, editors. AI 2006 Adv Artif Intell. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; p. 1015–1021. doi:10.1007/11941439_114
   Google Scholar
• Statnikov A, Wang L, Aliferis CF. 2008. A comprehensive comparison of random forests and support vector machines for microarray-based cancer classification. BMC Bioinformatics. 9(1):319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennessen CM, Cimprich B. 1995. Views to nature: effects on attention. J Environ Psychol. 15(1):77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregenza P, Wilson M. 2013. Daylighting: architecture and lighting design. Milton Park (United Kingdom): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2005. Discomfort glare from interesting images. Light Res Technol. 37(4):329–341.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS. 1981. Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ Behav. 13(5):523–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGBC. 2020. LEED v4.1: Building design and construction. [accessed 06 June 2022]. https://www.usgbc.org/credits/commercial-interiors-retail-commercial-interiors-hospitality-commercial-interiors/v41/eq123
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Christoffersen J, Galasiu AD. 2012. Daylight and view through residential windows: effects on well-being. In: LDA Mag. Krakow (Poland): Illuminating Engineering Society; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch JA, Galasiu AD. 2012. The physiological and psychological effects of windows, daylight, and view at home: review and research agenda. Report No. IRC-RR-325: National Research Council of Canada. [accessed 2019 Dec 2]. doi:10.4224/20375039
   Google Scholar
• Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M. 2007. Health effects of viewing landscapes – landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban For Urban Green. 6(4):199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Waczynska M, Sokol N, Martyniuk-Peczek J. 2021. Computational and experimental evaluation of view out according to European Standard EN17037. Build Environ. 188:107414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren C, McGraw AP, Van Boven L. 2011. Values and preferences: defining preference construction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2(2):193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Yang H. 2019. Research on k-value selection method of k-means clustering algorithm. J. 2(2):226–235.
   Google Scholar