Data-Driven Selection of Typical Opaque Material Reflectances for Lighting Simulation

References

• Alight A, Jakubiec JA. 2021. Evaluating the use of photobiology-driven alertness and health measures for circadian lighting design. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2021; Bruges, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan P, Jakubiec A. 2016. Measuring light through trees for daylight simulations: a photographic and photometric method. Building Simulation and Optimization; Newcastle, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan P, Jakubiec JA. 2019. Spectral rendering with daylight: A comparison of two spectral daylight simulation platforms. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2019; Rome, Italy. IBSPA.
   Google Scholar
• Brembilla E, Hopfe CJ, Mardaljevic J. 2018. Influence of input reflectance values on climate-based daylight metrics using sensitivity analysis. J Build Perform Simul. 11(3):333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Building and Construction Authority of Singapore. 2014. Green Mark: non-residential buildings 2015. Singapore: Building and Construction Authority of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Building Research Establishment. 2021. BREEAM: new construction technical standard. Watford, UK: BRE Global.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2005. Lighting guide 7: office lighting. London: CIBSE.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2011. Lighting guide 5: lighting for education. London: CIBSE.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 2015. AM11: building performance modelling. London: CIBSE.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission internationale de l’eclairage. 2018a. CIE S 026/E:2018 CIE system for metrology of optical radiation for ipRGC-influenced responses to light. Vienna, Austria: Commission internationale de l’eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission internationale de l’eclairage. 2018b. ISO/CIE 11664-4:2019(E) Colorimetry — part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* colour space. Vienna, Austria: Commission internationale de l’eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage Proceedings. 1924. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission internationale de l’eclairage TC 1-85. 2018. CIE 015:2018 colorimetry. 4th ed. Vienna, Austria: Commission internationale de l’eclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp VHC, Littlefair PJ 1984. Average daylight factor prediction. In: Proceedings of Natural Lighting Conference; Cambridge, UK. CIBSE; p. 234–243.
   Google Scholar
• DiLaura DL, Houser K, Mistrick R, and Steffy GR. 2011. The lighting handbook: reference and application. New York, NY, USA: IESNA.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization. 2018. European standard EN 17037 daylight in buildings. Brussels (Belgium): European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing PH, Haymaker J, Edelstein EA. 2017. Simulating circadian light: multi-dimensional illuminance analysis. Proceedings of the 15th IBPSA Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fairman HS, Brill MH, Hemmendinger H. 1997. How the CIE 1931 color-matching functions were derived from Wright‐Guild data. Color Res Appl. 22(1):11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler-Moroder D, and Dür A. 2010. Estimating melatonin suppression and photosynthesis activity in real-world scenes from computer generated images. Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision; Joensuu, Finland: Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Glassner AS. 1995. Principles of digital image synthesis. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan-Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Gooley JJ, Mien IH, Hilaire MAS, Yeo S-C, Chua EC-P, Van Reen E, Hanley CJ, Hull JT, Czeisler CA, Lockley SW. 2012. Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptors play different roles in mediating pupillary light responses during exposure to continuous light in humans. J Neurosci. 32(41):14242–14253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild J. 1931. The colorimetric properties of the spectrum. Philos Trans Royal Soc A. 230(681–693):149–187.
   Google Scholar
• Heshong L. 2012. Daylight metrics–Public interest energy research program report. Gold River, CA. CEC-500-2012-053.
   Google Scholar
• Houser K, Boyce P, Zeitzer J, Herf M. 2021. Human-centric lighting: myth, magic or metaphor? Light Res Technol. 53(2):97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IES Daylight Metrics Committee. 2012. IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Inanici M, Brennan M, and Clark E. 2015. Spectral daylighting simulations: computing circadian light. Building Simulation; Hyderabad (India): IBPSA.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF. 2014. Assessing disability glare potential of reflections from new construction: case study analysis and recommendations for the future. Transp Res Rec. 2449(1):114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA. 2016. Building a database of opaque materials for lighting simulation. Passive and Low Energy Architecture; Los Angeles (CA): PLEA Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec JA, Srisamranrungruang T, Kong Z, Quek G, Talami R 2019. Subjective and Measured Evidence for Residential Lighting Metrics in the Tropics. Building Simulation Conference; Rome, IT. IBPSA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones NL, Reinhart CF. 2017. Experimental validation of ray tracing as a means of image-based visual discomfort prediction. Build Environ. 113:131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Z, Jakubiec JA. 2019. Instantaneous and long-term lighting design metrics for higher education buildings in a tropical climate. Building Simulation; Rome (Italy).
   Google Scholar
• [LBNL] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2021a. International glazing database.
   Google Scholar
• [LBNL] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2021b. Optics version 6.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefair P. 1988. Average daylight factor: a simple basis for daylight design. Vol. 15. England: Building Research Establishment Watford.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas RJ, Lall GS, Allen AE, Brown TM. 2012. How rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors come together to enlighten the mammalian circadian clock. Prog Brain Res. 199:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas RJ, Peirson SN, Berson DM, Brown TM, Cooper HM, Czeisler CA, Figueiro MG, Gamlin PD, Lockley SW, O’Hagan JB. 2014. Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age. Trends Neurosci. 37(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. 2001. The development of the CIE 2000 colour‐difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 26(5):340–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J. 2000. Simulation of annual daylighting profiles for internal illuminance. Light Res Technol. 32(3):111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J, Andersen M, Roy N, Christoffersen J. 2012. Daylighting metrics: is there a relation between useful daylight illuminance and daylight glare probabilty? Loughborough (UK): Building Simulation and Optimization.
   Google Scholar
• McCamy CS, Marcus H, Davidson JG. 1976. A color-rendition chart. J App Photog Eng. 2(3):95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2005. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Light Res Technol. 37(1):41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Parsaee M, Demers CM, Potvin A, Lalonde J-F, Inanici M, Hébert M. 2021. Biophilic photobiological adaptive envelopes for sub-Arctic buildings: exploring impacts of window sizes and shading panels’ color, reflectance, and configuration. Sol Energy. 220:802–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascale D. 2006. RGB coordinates of the Macbeth ColorChecker. The BabelColor Company; p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson C, Aarts M, Andersen M. 2021. Validation of spectral simulation tools for the prediction of indoor daylight exposure. Bruges (Belgium): Building Simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Proskuriakov NE, Yakovlev BS, and Arkhangelskaia NN. 2021. Features of the CIE76, CIE-94, and CIE-2000 methods that affect the quality of the determining process of the image average color. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing Omsk, Russian Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Quek G, Jakubiec JA. 2019. Calibration and validation of climate-based daylighting models based on one-time field measurements: office buildings in the tropics. LEUKOS.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman SA, Brainard GC, Czeisler CA, Lockley SW. 2021. Spectral sensitivity of circadian phase resetting, melatonin suppression and acute alerting effects of intermittent light exposure. Biochem Pharmacol. 191:114504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea M. 2015. The lumen seen in a new light: making distinctions between light, lighting and neuroscience. Light Res Technol. 47(3):259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. LEUKOS. 3(1):7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockcastle S, Ámundadóttir ML, Andersen M. 2017. Contrast measures for predicting perceptual effects of daylight in architectural renderings. Light Res Technol. 49(7):882–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer AO, Chamilothori K. 2019. Influence of subjective impressions of a space on brightness satisfaction: an experimental study in virtual reality. SimAUD; Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Schlangen LJ. 2019. CIE position statement on non-visual effects of light: recommending proper light at the proper time. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Schlangen LJ, Price LL. 2021. The lighting environment, its metrology, and non-visual responses. Front Neurol. 12:235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. 2005. The CIEDE2000 color‐difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 30(1):21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solemma LLC. 2018. ALFA: Adaptive Lighting for Alertness Version 0.5.6.4. Cambridge, MA, USA. https://www.solemma.com/alfaPublisher name: Solemma LLC
   Google Scholar
• Spitschan M, Lazar R, Yetik E, Cajochen C. 2019. No evidence for an S cone contribution to acute neuroendocrine and alerting responses to light. Curr Biol. 29(24):R1297–R1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam S. 2017. Daylighting simulations with radiance using matrix-based methods.
   Google Scholar
• [USGBC] US Green Building Council. 2009. LEED for new construction. Washington, DC, USA: US Green Building Council.
   Google Scholar
• Vrhel MJ, Gershon R, Iwan LS. 1994. Measurement and analysis of object reflectance spectra. Color Res Appl. 19(1):4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrhel MJ, Gershon R, Iwan LS. 1994. Measurement and analysis of object reflectance spectra. Color Research & Application. 19(1):4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward GJ. 1994. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ward G. 1995. Sample materials. https://floyd.lbl.gov/mgf/materials.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ward G, Shakespeare R. 1998. Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Wright W. 1930. A re-determination of the mixture curves of the spectrum. Trans Opt Soc. 31(4):201.
   Google Scholar