Continuous Overcast Daylight Autonomy (DAo.con): A New Dynamic Metric for Sensor-Less Lighting Smart Controls

References

• Acosta I, Campano MA, Dominguez-Amarillo S, Muñoz C. 2018. Dynamic daylight metrics for electricity savings in offices: window size and climate smart lighting management. Energies. 11(11):3143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Campano MA, Domínguez S, Fernández-Agüera J. 2019. Minimum daylight autonomy: a new concept to link daylight dynamic metrics with daylight factors. LEUKOS - J Illum Eng Soc North Am. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Campano MA, Molina JF. 2016. Window design in architecture: analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Appl Energy. 168:493–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Munoz C, Campano MA, Navarro J. 2015a. Analysis of daylight factors and energy saving allowed by windows under overcast sky conditions. Renew Energy. 77(1):194–207.
   Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Munoz C, Esquivias P, Moreno D, Navarro J. 2015b. Analysis of the accuracy of the sky component calculation in daylighting simulation programs. Sol Energy. 119:54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. 2013a. Towards an analysis of the performance of lightwell skylights under overcast sky conditions. Energy Build. 64. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. 2013b. Predictive method of the sky component in a courtyard under overcast sky conditions. Sol Energy. 89:89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ. 2015c. Towards an Analysis of the Performance of Monitor Skylights under Overcast Sky Conditions. Energy Build. 88:248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta I, Navarro J, Sendra JJ, Esquivias P. 2012. Daylighting design with lightscoop skylights: towards an optimization of proportion and spacing under overcast sky conditions. Energy Build. 49:394–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand P, Cheong D, Sekhar C, Santamouris M, Kondepudi S. 2019. Energy saving estimation for plug and lighting load using occupancy analysis. Renew Energy. 143:1143–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association Suisse des Electriciens. 1989. Éclairage Intérieur Par La Lumière Du Jour - Swiss Norm SN 418911. Geneva (Switzerland): Association Suisse des Electriciens, Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bartzokas A, Kambezidis HD, Darula S, Kittler R. 2005. Comparison between winter and summer sky-luminance distribution in central Europe and in the eastern Mediterranean. J Atmos Solar-Terrestrial Phys. 67(7):709–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccali M, Bonomolo M, Ciulla G, Lo Brano V. 2018. Assessment of indoor illuminance and study on best photosensors’ position for design and commissioning of daylight linked control systems. A new method based on artificial neural networks. Energy. 154:466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellia L, Acosta I, Campano MA, Fragliasso F. 2020. Impact of daylight saving time on lighting energy consumption and on the biological clock for occupants in office buildings. Sol Energy. 211(September):1347–1364.
   Google Scholar
• Bellia L, Fragliasso F. 2017. New parameters to evaluate the capability of a daylight-linked control system in complementing daylight. Build Environ. 123:223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellia L, Fragliasso F. 2019. Automated daylight-linked control systems performance with illuminance sensors for side-lit offices in the mediterranean area. Autom Constr. 100(July 2018):145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bellia L, Fragliasso F, Stefanizzi E. 2016. Why are daylight-linked controls (DLCs) Not so spread? A literature review. Build Environ. 106:301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellia L, Pedace A, Fragliasso F. 2015. The impact of the software’s choice on dynamic daylight simulations’ results: a comparison between daysim and 3ds max design®. Sol Energy. 122:249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2010. The impact of light in buildings on human health. Indoor Built Environ. 19:8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campano MÁ, Acosta I, Domínguez S, López-Lovillo R. 2022. Dynamic analysis of office lighting smart controls management based on user requirements. Autom Constr. 133. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campano MAA, Acosta I, Leó AL, León AL, Calama C. 2018. Validation study for daylight dynamic metrics by using test cells in mediterranean area. Int J Eng Technol. 10(6):487–491.
   Google Scholar
• Choi H, Hong S, Choi A, Sung M. 2016. Toward the accuracy of prediction for energy savings potential and system performance using the daylight responsive dimming system. Energy Build. 133:271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIE. 2011. CIE S 017:2011 - international lighting vocabulary; Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage.
   Google Scholar
• CIE 110-1994: Spatial Distribution of Daylight - Luminance Distributions of Various Reference Skies. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage, Ed.
   Google Scholar
• CIE S 011/E: 2003: Spatial Distribution of Daylight - CIE Standard General Sky. 2003. Vienna (Austria): Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage.
   Google Scholar
• Darula S, Kittler R. 2002. CIE general sky standard defining luminance distributions. In: International building performance simulation association (IBPSA). Montreal (QC (Canada), QC (Canada)); p. 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosa A, Ferraro V, Kaliakatsos D, Marinelli V. 2010. Calculating indoor natural illuminance in overcast sky conditions. Appl Energy. 87(3):806–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis FV. 2014. Multi-Criteria decision analysis to select the optimum position and proper field of view of a photosensor. Energy Convers Manag. 86:1069–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Sharples S. 2011. Assessing and predicting average daylight factors of adjoining spaces in atrium buildings under overcast sky. Build Environ. 46(11):2142–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquivias P, Munoz C, Acosta I, Moreno D, Navarro J. 2016. Climate-Based daylight analysis of fixed shading devices in an open-plan office. Light Res Technol. 48(2):205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes LL, Lee ES, Dibartolomeo DL, McNeil A. 2014. Monitored lighting energy savings from dimmable lighting controls in the new york times headquarters building. Energy Build. 68(PARTA):498–514.
   Google Scholar
• Galatioto A, Beccali M. 2016. Aspects and issues of daylighting assessment: a review study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 66:852–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IESNA. 2011. DiLaura D, Houser K, Mistrick R, Steffy G, Eds. Lighting handbook 10h Edition. 10th ed. New York (USA): Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• IESNA. 2013. IES spatial daylight autonomy (SDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). New York (USA): America, I. E. S. of N., Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Igawa N, Koga Y, Matsuzawa T, Nakamura H. 2004. Models of sky radiance distribution and sky luminance distribution. Sol Energy. 77(2):137–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. UNE-EN 12464-1:2012, light and lighting - lighting of work places - part 1: indoor work places. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standarisation Office.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019. UNE-EN 15193-1:2019, energy performance of buildings - energy requirements for lighting - part 1: specifications, module M9. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standarisation Office.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020. UNE-EN 17037:2020, daylight in buildings. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standarisation Office.
   Google Scholar
• Karayel M, Navvab M, Ne’eman E, Selkowitz S. 1984. Zenith luminance and sky luminance distributions for daylighting calculations. Energy Build. 6(3):283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C-H, Kim K-S. 2019. Development of sky luminance and daylight illuminance prediction methods for lighting energy saving in office buildings. Energies. 12(4):592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittler R, Darula S. 2001. Scattering indicatrix : a primary characteristic of light diffusion for sky pattern models. Build Res J. 49(4):273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Kittler R, Darula S. 2017. The new generation of an artificial sky: simulating various overcast sky conditions. In: Lux Europa 2017. Ljubljana (Slovenia); p. 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lamm LO. 1981. A new analytic expression for the equation of time. Sol Energy. 26(5):465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen OK, Jensen RL, Antonsen T, Strømberg I. 2017. Estimation methodology for the electricity consumption with daylight- and occupancy-controlled artificial lighting. Energy Procedia. 122:733–738.
   Google Scholar
• LBNL. 2012. Lawrence berkeley national laboratory technical report (2012) 1278 - energyplus engineering reference. The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• León-Rodríguez AL, Suárez R, Bustamante P, Campano MA, Moreno-Rangel D. 2017. Design and performance of test cells as an energy evaluation model of facades in a mediterranean building area. Energies. 10(11):1816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie RP, Radetsky LC, Smith AM. 2012. Conceptual design metrics for daylighting. Light Res Technol. 44(3):277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Cheung ACK, Chow SKH, Lee EWM. 2014. Study of daylight data and lighting energy savings for atrium corridors with lighting dimming controls. Energy Build. 72(February 2012):457–464.
   Google Scholar
• Li DHW, Lau CCS, Lam JC. 2004. Overcast sky conditions and luminance distribution in Hong Kong. Build Environ. 39(1):101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Verso VRM, Pellegrino A. 2019. Energy Saving Generated through Automatic Lighting Control Systems According to the Estimation Method of the Standard EN 15193-1. J Daylighting. 6(2):131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mangione A, Mattoni B, Bisegna F, Iatauro D, Zinzi M On the validity of daylight factor for evaluating the energy performance of building. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy; 2018; p. 1–4. doi:10.1109/EEEIC.2018.8494450.
   Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic J. 1995. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Light Res Technol. 27:181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus J. 1991. Astronomical formulae for calculators. Richmond (Virginia (USA), Virginia (USA)): Willman-Bell.
   Google Scholar
• Moon P, Spencer DE. 1942. Illumination from a non-uniform sky. Illum Eng. 37:707–726.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz CM, Esquivias PM, Moreno D, Acosta I, Navarro J. 2014. Climate-Based daylighting analysis for the effects of location, orientation and obstruction. Light Res Technol. 46:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2005. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Light Res Technol. 37(1):41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2006. Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energy Build. 38(7):905–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Oki M, Hayashi Y. 1985. Luminance distribution of intermediate sky. J Light Vis Environ. 9(1):6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Oki M, Hayashi Y, Iwata T The mean sky composed depending on the absolute luminance values of the sky element and application to the daylighting prediction. In Proceedings of international daylighting conference; 1986; Long Beach (USA), p. 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Seals R, Michalsky J. 1993. All-Weather model for sky luminance distribution-preliminary configuration and validation. Sol Energy. 50(3):235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitel IJ. 1985. Emerging lighting control technologies: the alternatives and trade-offs. J Illum Eng Soc. 14(2):624–632.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Breton P-F. 2009. Experimental validation of autodesk® 3ds max® design 2009 and daysim 3.0. LEUKOS - J Illum Eng Soc North Am. 6(1):7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. LEUKOS - J Illum Eng Soc North Am. 3(1):7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Roisin B, Bodart M, Deneyer A, D’Herdt P. 2008. Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption. Energy Build. 40(4):514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert WR, Lootens C, Geldof J, Hanselaer P. 2010. Criteria for energy efficient lighting in buildings. Energy Build. 42(3):341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishegar N, Boubekri M. 2017. Quantifying electrical energy savings in offices through installing daylight responsive control systems in hot climates. Energy Build. 153:87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler A, Gopinathan KK, Claros ST. 2001. Study on zenith luminance on Madrid overcast skies. Renew Energy. 23(1):49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soori PK, Vishwas M. 2013. Lighting control strategy for energy efficient office lighting system design. Energy Build. 66:329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregenza P. 2014. Opinion: climate-based daylight modelling or daylight factor? Light Res Technol. 46(6):618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W, Wei M, Smet KAG, Lin Y. 2017. The prediction of perceived colour differences by colour fidelity metrics. Light Res Technol. 49(7):805–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun GY, Kim H, Kim JT. 2012. Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption. Energy Build. 46:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar