Skinfolds compressibility and digital caliper’s time response in skinfold measurement in male and female young adults

References

• Kasper, AM, Langan-Evans, C, Hudson, JF, et al. Come back skinfolds, all is forgiven: a narrative review of the efficacy of common body composition methods in applied sports practice. Nutrients. 2021;13(4):1075. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/4/1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla, DA, De León, LG, Alexander-Cortez, P, et al. Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: scoping review and reference values. Nutr Health. 2022;28(1):95–878. doi: 10.1177/02601060211002941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campa, F, Toselli, S, Mazzilli, M, et al. Assessment of body composition in athletes: a narrative review of Available methods with special reference to quantitative and qualitative bioimpedance analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1620. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/5/1620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecherques-Carini, M, Esparza-Ros, F, Albaladejo-Saura, M, et al. Agreement and differences between fat estimation formulas using Kinanthropometry in a physically active population. Appl Sci. 2022;12(24):13043. doi: 10.3390/app122413043
   Google Scholar
• Norton, K, Olds, K. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and Health courses. Sydney: UNSW Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Clarys, JP, Provyn, S, Marfell-Jones, MJ. Cadaver studies and their impact on the understanding of human adiposity. Ergonomics. 2005;48(11–14):1445–1461. doi: 10.1080/00140130500101486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cintra-Andrade, JH, Ripka, WL, Heymsfield, SB. Skinfold calipers: which instrument to use? J Nutr Sci. 2023;12:e82. doi: 10.1017/jns.2023.58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, DAW, Hammond, WH, Healy, MJR, et al. Design and accuracy of calipers for measuring subcutaneous tissue thickness. Br J Nutr. 1955;9(2):133–143. doi: 10.1079/BJN19550021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, PK, Carter, JE. Static and dynamic differences among five types of skinfold calipers. Hum Biol. 1990;62(3):369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esparza-Ros, F, Vaquero-Cristóbal, R, Marfell-Jones, M. International standards for anthropometric assessment (2019). Murcia: International Society for Advancement in Kinanthropometry; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, HJ, Ulmer, HV. Two-second standardization of the Harpenden caliper. Europ J Appl Physiol. 1981;46(1):103–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00422182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, TG. Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: a review. Hum Biol [Internet]. 1981;53:181–225.
   Google Scholar
• Quintas, MR, Andrade, TF, Restivo, MT, et al. LipoWise: a new generation of skinfold calipers. Sens Transducers J. 2015;185:162–169.
   Google Scholar
• Bini, A, Amaral, TF, Oliveira, BMPM, et al. Skinfolds compressibility and calliper’s time response in male athletes. Prog Nutr. 2018;20:273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, AD, Drinkwater, DT, Clarys, JP, et al. Effects of skin thickness and skinfold compressibility on skinfold thickness measurement. Am J Hum Biol. 1992;4(4):453–460. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.1310040404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, TF, Quintas, MR, Silva, CM, et al. Virtual instrumentation in biomedical equipment. Int J Onl Eng. 2013;9(S1):28. doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v9iS1.2283
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, TF, Restivo, M, Guerra, R, et al. Accuracy of a digital skinfold system for measuring skinfold thickness and estimating body fat. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:478–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esparza-Ros, F, Moreira, AC, Vaquero-Cristóbal, R, et al. Differences between four skinfold calipers in the assessment of adipose tissue in young adult healthy population. Nutrients. 2022;14(10):2085. doi: 10.3390/nu14102085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himes, J, Roche, A, Siervogel, R. Compressibility of skinfolds and the measurement of subcutaneous fatness. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979;32(8):1734–1740. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/32.8.1734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori, K, Okamoto, W. Skinfold compressibility in Japanese University students. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1993;70(2–3):69–77. doi: 10.2535/ofaj1936.70.2-3_69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, BM, Hillebrandt, HL, Sculley, DV, et al. The acute effect of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptive cycle on measures of body composition. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121(11):3051–3059. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04771-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, JN, Ducker, KJ, Furzer, BJ, et al. Measures of body composition via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, ultrasound and skinfolds are not impacted by the menstrual cycle in active eumenorrheic females. J Sci Med Sport. 2022;25(2):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.09.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuschieri, S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(5):31. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18
   Google Scholar
• Betts, JA, Gonzalez, JT, Burke, LM, et al. PRESENT 2020: text expanding on the checklist for proper reporting of evidence in Sport and exercise nutrition trials. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2020;30:2–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipowise. Lipowise callibration data. https://lipowise.com/onboarding/. 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, LE, Maresh, CM, Castellani, JW, et al. Urinary indices of hydration status. Int J Sport Nutr. 1994;4(3):265–279. doi: 10.1123/ijsn.4.3.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarys, JP, Martin, AD, Drinkwater, DT, et al. The skinfold: myth and reality. J Sports Sci. 1987;5(1):3–33. doi: 10.1080/02640418708729760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, R, Rempel, R, Anderson, GS. Modeling dynamic skinfold compression. Am J Hum Biol. 1999;11(4):531–537. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1999)11:4<531:AID-AJHB13>3.0.CO;2-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar