What’s the Payoff?: Assessing the Efficacy of Student Response Systems

References

• Atkinson, Maxine, and Andrea Hunt. 2008. “Inquiry-Guided Learning in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology 36(1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, Ian, William Gerace, William Leonar, and Robert Dufresne. 2006. “Designing Effective Questions for Classroom Response System Teaching.” American Journal of Physics 74(1): 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, David. 1981. Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, Diane, Jessica Van den Plas, and Katherine Havanki. 2006. “Comparing the Effectiveness on Student Achievement of a Student Response System Versus Online WebCT Quizzes.” Journal of Chemistry Education 83(3): 488–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Jane. 2007. “Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips.” Life Science Education 6(1): 9–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper, James, and Pamela Robinson. 2000. “The Argument for Making Large Classes Seem Small.” In Strategies for Energizing Large Classes: From Small Groups to Learning Communities, eds. Jean MacGregor and James L. Cooper. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cue, Nelson. 1998. “A Universal Learning Tool for Classrooms?” Paper presented at the First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference, Hong Kong SAR, China.
   Google Scholar
• Damron, Danny and Jonathan Mott. 2006. “Creating an Interactive Classroom: Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning in Political Science Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 1(3): 367–383.
   Google Scholar
• d’Inverno, Ray, Hugh Davis, and Su White. 2003. “Using a Personal Response System or Promoting Student Interaction.” Teaching Math Applications 22(4): 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, Stephen. 2002. “Evaluating Effective Use of PRS: Results of the Evaluation of the Use of PRS in Glasgow University, October 2001–June 2002.” http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/evs/papers/eval.pdf (March 18, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Draper, Stephen, and Margaret Brown. 2002. “Use of the PRS (Personal Response System) handsets at Glasgow University, Interim Evaluation Report: March 2002.” http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/handsets/interim.html (March 18, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Draper, Stephen, Julie Cargill, and Quintin Cutts. 2002. “Electronically Enhanced Classroom Interaction.” Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18(1): 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Douglas. 2005. Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather K. 2012. “Making Politics “Click”: The Costs and Benefits of Using Clickers in an Introductory Political Science Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(1): 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Gauci, Sally, Arianne Dantas, David Williams, and Robert Kemm. 2009. “Promoting Student-Centered Active Learning in Lectures with a Personal Response System.” Advances in Physiology Education 33(1): 60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Maryellen. 1986. “Better Communication in Large Courses.” College Teaching 34(1): 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, Richard. 1998. “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66(1): 64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halloran, Laurel. 1995. “A Comparison of Two Methods of Teaching: Computer Managed Instruction and Keypad Questions versus Traditional Classroom Lecture.” Computers in Nursing 13(6): 285–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoekstra, Angel. 2008. “Vibrant Student Voices: Exploring Effects of the Use of Clickers in Large College Courses.” Learning, Media and Technology 33(4): 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, Lauren, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, and Jennifer M. J. Yim. 2013. “Adapting Clicker Technology to Diversity Courses: New Research Insights.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(3): 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Jennifer. 2011. “Innovative Activities: How Clickers Can Facilitate the Use of Simulations in Large Lecture Classes.” Technology Innovations in Statistics Education 5(1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Jennifer, and William Wood. 2005. “Teaching More by Lecturing Less.” Cell Biology Education 4(4): 298–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazur, Eric. 1997. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, Lillian, and Edward Redish. 1999. “Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research.” American Journal of Physics Research 67(9): 755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, Wilber James, and Barbara Hofer. 2002. McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Mollborn, Stefanie, and Angel Hoekstra. 2010. “A Meeting of the Minds: Using Clickers for Critical Thinking and Discussion in Large Sociology Classes.” Teaching Sociology 38(1): 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, Jeremey, William Penuel, and Lois Abrahamson. 2004. “Classroom Response and Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. http://humansphere.com.sg/pdf/an/Classroom%20Response%20and%20Communication%20Systems.pdf (March 18, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Vicki, and Martin Oliver. 2006. “Using Electronic Voting Systems in Lectures.” www.ucl.ac.uk/learningtechnology/examples/ElectronicVotingSystems.pdf (March 18, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michelle, William Wood, Wendy Adams, Carl Wieman, Jennifer Knight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su. 2009. “Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions.” Science 323(5910): 122–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sticklen, Jon, and Mark Urban-Lurain. 2006. “Enhancing Learning of Low Ability Students in Multi-Section Freshman Lecture/Laboratory Classes.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting: Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, Jeffrey, and Jason Nelson. 2007. “Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion.” Teaching of Psychology 34(4): 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees, April, and Michelle Jackson. 2007. “The Learning Environment in Clicker Classrooms: Student Processes of Learning and Involvement in Large University-Level Courses Using Student Response Systems.” Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, Stacy G., and Fondren Notman. 2012. “Is Class Appreciation Just a Click Away?: Using Student Response System Technology to Enhance Shy Students’ Introductory American Government Experience.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(4): 352–371.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L. A., G. C. van den Ber, and H. van Keulen. 2001. “Interactive Lectures in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 26(1): 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wit, Ernst. 2003. “Who Wants to Be … The Use of a Personal Response System in Statistics Teaching.” MSOR Connections 3(2): 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Bao Hui, Ronald Patterson, Gail Richmond, Joyce Parker, John Merrill, and Mark Urban-Lurain. 2005. “Using Self-Response System and Online Learning Environment in Large College Science Classes-The Technologies, Instructional Design, and Implications.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Singapore.
   Google Scholar