EU Simulations and Engagement: Motivating Greater Interest in European Union Politics

References

• Ainley, Mary, Suzanne Hidi, and Dagmar Berndorff. 2002. “Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes that Mediate Their Relationship.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94(3): 545–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amyot, Robert P. 2014. “Is It Better to Be Feared Than Loved? Investigating the Efficacy of Different Teaching Methods on the Learning of Specific Content.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47(4): 855–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, Kathy L. and Beverly J. Cameron. 1999. “Enlivening Political Science Courses with Kolb’s Learning Preference Model.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32(2): 251–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruson, Kiki. 2005. “So, you want to run for elected office? How to engage students in the campaign process without leaving the classroom.” Political Science and Politics 38(02): 305–310.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, Beth K. 2003. “Byzantine Politics: Using Simulations to Make Sense of the Middle East.” Political Science and Politics 36(2): 239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egmond, Marcel van, Wouter van der Brug, Sara Hobolt, Mark Franklin, and Eliyahu V. Sapir. 2013. “European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study.” GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi:10.4232/1.11760.
   Google Scholar
• Farneti, Roberto, Irene Bianchi, Tajnja Mayrgründter, and Johannes Niederhauser. 2014. “The Network is the Message: Social Networks as Teaching Tools.” In Teaching and Learning the European Union: Traditional and Innovative Methods, eds. Stefania Baroncelli Roberto Farneti Ioan Horga and Sophie Vanhoonacker (pp. 229–240). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Michael R. 2005. “Transplanting Active Learning Abroad: Creating a Stimulating Negotiation Pedagogy across Cultural Divides.” International Studies Perspectives 6(2): 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L. and Shirely A. Ronkowski. 1997. “Learning Styles of Political Science Students.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30(4): 732–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, Judith M. and Chris S. Hulleman. 2010. “The Importance of Interest: The Role of Achievement Goals and Task Values in Promoting the Development of Interest.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(1): 42–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, John Paul and Barbara Millis. 2002. Using Simulations to Promote Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, Suzanne. 1990. “Interest and its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning.” Review of Educational Research 60(4): 549–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, Suzanne and William Baird. 1988. “Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts.” Reading Research Quarterly (1988): 465–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, Suzanne and K. Ann Renninger. 2006. “The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41(2): 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Rebecca. 2008. “Evaluating a Cross-Continent EU Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 4(4): 404–434.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Rebecca and Peter Bursens. 2014. “Assessing EU Simulations: Evidence from the Trans-Atlantic EuroSim.” In Teaching and Learning the European Union: Traditional and Innovative Methods, eds. Stefania Baroncelli Roberto Farneti Ioan Horga and Sophie Vanhoonacker (pp. 157–185). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelle, Alexander. 2008. “Experiential Learning in an Arms Control Simulation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(2): 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klymenko, Lina. 2014. “‘Was du mich tun lässt, das verstehe ich’: Wie man studierende beim lernen der politikwissenschaft unterstützen kann” [“‘Involve Me, and I Will Understand’: How to Engage Students in Political Science Classes]. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 3: 293–304.
   Google Scholar
• Krain, Matthew and Jeffrey S. Lantis. 2006. “Building Knowledge? Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Global Problems Summit Simulation.” International Studies Perspectives 7(4): 395–407.
   Google Scholar
• Krain, Matthew and Christina J. Shadle. 2006. “Starving for Knowledge: An Active Learning Approach to Teaching about World Hunger.” International Studies Perspectives 7(1): 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Heidi and Christine Neuhold. 2014. “Problem-Based Learning in European Studies.” In Teaching and Learning the European Union: Traditional and Innovative Methods, eds. Stefania Baroncelli Roberto Farneti Ioan Horga and Sophie Vanhoonacker (pp. 199–215). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mihai, Alexandra. 2014. “Finding the Right Mix? Teaching European Studies Through Blended Learning.” In Teaching and Learning the European Union: Traditional and Innovative Methods, eds. Stefania Baroncelli Roberto Farneti Ioan Horga and Sophie Vanhoonacker (pp. 217–228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, April L. 2003. “Toward a Global Theory of Mind: The Potential Benefits of Presenting a Range of IR Theories through Active Learning.” International Studies Perspectives 4(4): 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, William W. and Judyth L. Twigg. 2000. “Active Engagement of the Intro IR Student: A Simulation Approach.” PS: Political Science and Politics 33(4): 835–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omelicheva, Mariya Y. and Olga Avdeyeva. 2008. “Teaching with Lecture or Debate? Testing the Effectiveness of Traditional Versus Active Learning Methods of Instruction.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(3): 603–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raines, Susan Summers. 2003. “The Potential Perils of Slack (not Pack) Pedagogy: A Response to J. Martin Rochester’s Remarks about Active Learning Strategies.” International Studies Perspectives 4(4): 432–435.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1999. “One Experience is Worth a Thousand Words: Engaging Undergraduates in Field Research on Gender.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32(1): 63–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, Ulrich, Andreas Krapp, and Adolf Winteler. 1992. “Interest as a Predictor of Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Research.” In The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, eds. K. Ann Renninger Suzanne Hidi and Adreas Krapp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 183–212.
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, Mel. 1996. Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject. Des Moines, IA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Elizabeth T. and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 29(4): 690–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, Gretchen J., Edward G. DeClair, and Peter H. Loedel. 2000. “Stimulating Simulations: Making the European Union a Classroom Reality.” International Studies Perspectives 1(2): 145–159.
   Google Scholar