Model United Nations and Deep Learning: Theoretical and Professional Learning

References

• Anderson, Lorin W., and David R. Krathwohl (eds.). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspective 6(3): 359–373.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chasek, Pamela S. 2005. “Power Politics, Diplomacy and Role Playing: Simulating the UN Security Council’s Response to Terrorism.” International Studies Perspective 6(1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• CommGAP and World Bank Institute. 2010. Negotiation 2010. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FeM6kp9Q80 (December 24, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Crossley-Frolick, Katy A. 2010. “Beyond Model UN: Simulating Multi-Level, Multi-Actor Diplomacy Using the Millemmium Development Goals.” International Studies Perspective 11(2): 184–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, Steven. 2012. “How Relevant are Other Ways to Learn?” In Teaching Politics and Internaitonal Relations, eds. C. Gormley-Heenan and S. Lightfoot. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, ch 6: 78–90.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, Susan. 2016. “Curriculum reform: A Transformation or Consumption Model for Politics and International Relations?” Australian Journal of Political Science 51(3): 555–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, Susan, and Josh Pallas. 2015. International Relations Theory and the UN: A Short Primer http://wikieducator.org/course/MUN2/aboutUN/theory/ (December 19, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., and Carolyn M. Shaw. 2010. “Assessment of Active Learning.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. R. A. Denemark. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1111/b.9781444336597.2010.x
   Google Scholar
• Haack, Kirsten. 2008. “UN Studies and the Curriculum as Active Learning Tool.” International Studies Perspective 9(4): 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, Matthew, and Sally Totman. 2012. “From Dictatorship to Democracy: Simulating the Politics of the Middle East.” In About Simulations, Games and Role Play in University Education, ed. C. Nygaard N. Courtney, and E. Leigh. Faringdon, UK: Libri Publishing, ch 11: 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Hatipoglu, Emre, Meltem Müftüler-Baç, and Terri Murphy. 2014. “Simulation Games in Teaching International Relations: Insights from a Multi-Day, Multi-Stage, Multi-Issue Simulation on Cyprus.” International Studies Perspective 15(4): 394–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, John P., and Barbara J. Millis. 2002. Using Simulations to Promote Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, Cristina. 2012. “Enhancing Politics Teaching Through Active Learning.” In Teaching Politics and International Relations, ed. C. Gormley-Heenan, and S. Lightfoot. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, ch 4: 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, Daniel. 2001. “The Uses and Limits of the Model United National in an International Relations Classroom.” International Studies Perspective 2(3): 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenbesser, Lee. 2013. “The 2012 TRIP Survey of International Relations in Australia: One Problem to Rule Us All.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 67(2): 218–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MUN. 2015. University of Wollongong. http://www.wikieducator.org/course/MUN2/about/ (December 16, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Petranek, C. F. 2000. “Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations.” Simulations & Gaming 31(1): 108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Pettenger, Mary, Douglas West, and Niki Young. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of Role Play Simulations on Learning in Canadian and US Classrooms.” International Studies Perspective 15(4): 491–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad. 2010. “Do Role-Playing Simulations Generate Measurable and Meaningful Outcomes? A Simulation’s Effect on Exam Scores and Teaching Evaluations.” International Studies Perspective 11(1): 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad, and Simon Usherwood. 2013. “Assessment in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 157–167.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Paul. 2013. Summit Diplomacy: Some Lessons from History for 21st Century Leaders 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTEFyPhDMtU&feature=youtu.be (December 22, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, Carolyn M. 2010. “Designing and Using Simulations and Role-Play Exercises.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. R. A. Denemark: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1111/b.9781444336597.2010.x
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kürşad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Kirsten. 2013. “Simulations Inside and Outside the IR Classroom: A Comparative Analysis.” International Studies Perspective 14(2): 134–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueb, Bettina. 2013. “Teaching Students to Write for “Real Life”: Policy Paper Writing in the Classroom.” PS: Politics Science & Politics 46(1): 137–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar