Where Are the Women? An Analysis of Gender Mainstreaming in Introductory Political Science Textbooks

References

• Atchison, A. L. 2013. “The Practical Process of Gender Mainstreaming in the Political Science Curriculum.” Politics & Gender 9(2): 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison, A. L. 2015. “The Impact of Female Cabinet Ministers on a Female-Friendly Labor Environment.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 34(2): 388–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, L. 2010. “The Gender Lacuna in Comparative Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. 1991. “The Scholarship of Teaching from Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.” College Teaching 39(1): 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, K. A., and L. P. Ray. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 428–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. 2007. “Introduction.” International Studies Perspectives 8(3): 315–316. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00292.x
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., and A. L. Bos. 2013. “A Hidden Curriculum? Examining the Gender Content in Introductory-Level Political Science Textbooks.” Politics & Gender 9(2): 214–223. doi:10.1017/S1743923X13000068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., A. L. Bos, and L. E. Duncan. 2012. “Integrating Gender into the Political Science Core Curriculum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45(2): 238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., A. L. Bos, and M. C. Schneider. 2014. “Whose American Government? A Quantitative Analysis of Gender and Authorship in American Politics Texts.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(3): 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, E. C., M R. Holman, M. C. Schneider, and A. L. Bos. 2015. “Building a Gender and Methodology Curriculum: Integrated Skills, Exercises, and Practices.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., and M. L. Krook. 2006. Gender and Politics: The State of the Art. Politics 26(1): 18–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragun, R. 2007. “The Future of Textbooks.” Electronic Journal of Sociology 1(1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Di Stefano, C. (1997). “Integrating Gender Into the Political Science Curriculum: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 30(2): 204–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, L. 2013. “Gender Mainstreaming in Political Science Experiential Learning Programs.” Politics & Gender 9(2): 223–227. doi:10.1017/S1743923x1300007x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, K., and J. Patten. (2012). Why Politics Matters: An Introduction to Political Science (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2005. “Understanding Curriculum as Normalizing Text: Disability Studies Meet Curriculum Theory.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37(4): 421–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethridge, M., and H. Handelman. (2013). Politics in a Changing World (6th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Frueh, J. (2007). “Teaching Complexity with Gender.” International Studies Perspectives, 8(3): 317–319.
   Google Scholar
• Grigsby, E. (2015). Analyzing Politics (6th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.*
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A.-M. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, A. (2013). Politics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Houvouras, S., and J. Scott Carter. 2008. “The F Word: College Students’ Definitions of a Feminist.” Sociological Forum 23: 234–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M. C. 2008. “Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective.” The Journal of Politics 20(2): 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1963. “The Function of Dogma in Scientitic Research.” In Scientific Change, ed. A. C. Crombie. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, A., and K. Smits. 2015. “Reflections from the Field: Teaching Feminism/Teaching as a Feminist in Politics Departments.” Women’s Studies Journal 29(1): 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1(1): 333–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle-Gonga, M. (2013). “A Critical Analysis of Gender Mainstreaming.” Politics & Gender, 9(2): 209–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magstadt, T. (2014). Understanding politics: Ideas, institutions, and issues (11th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes.” The Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. 2005. “Quota Problems: Combatting the Dangers of Essentialism.” Politics & Gender 1(4): 621–638.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, M. 2013. “Conclusion and Rejoinders.” Politics & Gender 9(2): 235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertus, J. 2007. “Teaching Gender in International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 8(3): 323–325. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00295.x
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. 2010. “Feminism and Political History.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 56(1): 21–37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8497.2010.01539.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushaben, J. 2005. “Girl Power, Mainstreaming and Critical Mass: Women’s Leadership and Policy Paradigm Shift in Germany’s Red-Green Coalition, 1998–2002.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 27(1–2): 135–161. doi:10.1300/J501v27n01_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. A. 1992. “Textbooks and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” English for Specific Purposes 11(1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Olivo, C. 2012. “Bringing Women In: Gender and American Government and Politics Textbooks.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(2): 131–146. doi:10.1080/15512169.2012.667676
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2017). Introduction to Political Science: How to Think for Yourself about Politics. New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., D. W. Simon, and J. Romance. (2014). The Challenge of Politics: An Introduction to Political Science (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage/CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roskin, M. G., R. L. Cord, J. A. Medeiros, and W. S. Jones. (2012). Political Science: An Introduction (12th ed.). London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shively, W. Phillips. 2011. Power & Choice: An Introduction to Political Science. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2007. “Gender and Personal Pedagogy: Some Observations.” International Studies Perspectives 8(3): 336–339. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00298.x
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2011. “Feminist IR 101, Post #4: Common Myths about Feminist IR (and the ‘truth’).” http://duckofminerva.com/2010/12/feminist-ir-101-post-4-common-myths.html (Accessed 10 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Traweek, S. 2009. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M. 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada’s 35th Parliament.” Revue canadienne de science politique [Canadian Journal of Political Science] 31(3): 435–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M. 2006. “The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass.” Politics & Gender 2(4): 502–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle, D. A. (2015). A Novel Approach to Politics: Introducing Political Science Through Books, Movies, and Popular Culture (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage/CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlke, J. C. (1991). “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(1): 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. L., and M. D. Allen. 2008. “Survey of African American Portrayal in Introductory Textbooks in American Government/Politics: A Report of the APSA Standing Committee on the Status of Blacks in the Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41(1): 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. L., and M. D. Allen. 2016. “Affirmative Action Debates in American Government Introductory Textbooks.” Journal of Black Studies 47(7): 659–681. doi:10.1177/0021934716649645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, L. 2000. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23(1): 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xydias, C. 2013. “Mapping the Language of Women’s Interests: Sex and Party Affiliation in the Bundestag.” Political Studies 61(2): 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar