Laughing Our Way to a Stronger Democracy: Political Comedy’s Potential to Equalize Political Interest in Community College Students

References

• Alden, D. L., A. Mukherjee, and W. D. Hoyer. 2000. “The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humor in Advertising” Journal of Advertising 29(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Community Colleges. 2014. 2014 Fact Sheet. Accessed from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/Documents/Facts14_Data_R3.pdf (March 1, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry. 2009. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. 2003. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Jody and Jonathan S. Morris. 2006. “The Daily Show: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy and American Youth.” American Politics Research 34(3): 341–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonate, Peter. 2000. Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Paul R. and Emily Marquardt. 2007. “Mock News and Democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 15(4): 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, U. S. Department of Labor. 2013. “College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2012 High School Graduates.” Accessed on https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/hsgec_04172013.pdf (May 23, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Agnus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren E. Miller. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X. and P. R. Brewer. 2008. “Political Comedy Shows and Public Participation in Politics.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(1): 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Draut, Tamara. 2006. Strapped: Why America’s 20 and 30-Somethings Can’t Get Ahead. New York: Double Day.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Donald P. Green, James H. Kuklinski, and Arthur Lupia. 2006. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. http://groups.polisci.northwestern.edu/researchpool/Handbook.pdf (February 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Goel, V. and R. J. Dolan. 2001. “Functional Neuroanatomy of Humor: Segregating Cognitive and Affective Components” Nature Neuroscience 4: 237–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, John D. and Brian Newman. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” The Journal Of Politics 67: 1206–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, James T. 2003. All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Robert D. and Judith Torney. 1968. The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Lindsay H. and Dannagal G. Young. 2011. “Satire, Punch Lines, and the Nightly News: Untangling Media Effects on Political Participation.” Communication Research Reports, 28(2) (Apr.–June 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. Kent, Gregory B. Markus, Richard G. Niemi, and Laura Stoker. Youth-Parent Socialization Panel Study, 1965–1967: Four Waves Combined. ICPSR04037-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005-11-04. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04037.v1
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M. and J. Vishak. 2008. “Just Laugh! You Don’t Need to Remember: The Effects of Entertainment Media on Political Information Acquisition and Information Processing in Political Judgment.” Journal of Communication 58(2): 338–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFave, L., J. Haddad, and W. A. Maesen. 1996. “Superiority, Enhanced Self-Esteem and Perceived Incongruity Humor Theory.” In Humor and Laughter: Theory Research and Applications, eds. A. J. Chapman and H. V. Foot. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 63–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luskin, Robert C. 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12(4): 331–361.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, T. J. and M. C. Weinberger. 1982. “The Effects of Humor on Attention in Magazine Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 11(3): 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Paul S. 2004. “Voting’s Rewards: Voter Turnout, Attentive Publics and Congressional Allocation of Federal Money.” Journal of Political Science 47: 110–127.
   Google Scholar
• McGaw, Kathleen, Milton Lodge, and Patrick Stroh. 1990. “On-line Processing in Candidate Evaluation: The Effect of Issue order, Issue Importance, and Sophistication” Political Behavior 12(1): 41.
   Google Scholar
• Milbrath, Lester W. and Madan Lal Goel. 1977. Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Mobbs, D., M. Greicius, E. Azim, V. Menon, and A. L. Reiss. 2003. “Humor Modulates the Mesolimbic Reward Regions.” Neuron 40(5): 1041–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy, P., M. A. Xenos, and V. K. Hess. 2005. “Communication and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of Infotainment.” Mass Communication & Society 8(2): 111–131.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, Richard G. and Jane Junn. 1998. Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2012a. Demographics and Political Views of News Audiences. Washington, DC: Center for the People and the Press. http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/ (January 7, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2012b. “In Changing News Landscape, Even Television is Vulnerable: Trends in News Consumption 1991–2012.” http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/in-changing-news-landscape-even-television-is-vulnerable/ (January 17, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Houston, J. B., and Semmler, S. M. 2007. Mediating the vote: The changing media landscape in U.S. presidential campaigns. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., J. Cho, and K. Chong. 2001. “Communication Forms in U.S. presidential Campaigns: Influences on Candidate Predictions and the Democratic Process.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6(4): 88–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, William H. and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” The American Political Science Review 62(1): 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottinghaus, Brandon, Kenton Bird, Travis Ridout, and Rebecca Self. 2008. “‘It’s Better Than Being Informed’: College-Aged Viewers of The Daily Show.” In Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age, eds. Jody C. Baumgartner and Jonathan S. Morris (pp. 279–294). New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shani, Danielle. 2009. “On the Origins of Political Interest.” PhD diss. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Strick, Madelijn, Rick B. van Baaren, Rob W. Holland, and Ad van Knippenberg. 2011. “Humor in Advertisements Enhances Product Liking by Mere Association.” Psychology of Popular Media Culture 1(S):16–31.
   Google Scholar
• The American National Election Studies (ANES; http://www.electionstudies.org). The ANES 2012 Time Series Study. Stanford University and the University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• The American National Election Studies. (www.electionstudies.org). 2009. “General Interest in Public Affairs 1960–2008.” Stanford University and the University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, Judith. 2002. The School’s Role in Developing Civic Engagement: A Study of Adolescents in Twenty-Eight Countries. Applied Developmental Science 6(4):203–212.
   Google Scholar
• University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. 2014. 1970 British Cohort Study: Thirty-Eight Year Follow-Up, 2008–2009., UK Data Service. SN:6557, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6557-3
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, Jan. 1990. “Interest in Politics.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed. M. K. Jennings and J. W. Van Deth (pp. 275–312). New York: W. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Norman Nie, and Jae-On Kim. 1978. Participation and Political Equality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, Melissa, Ann B. Frymier, and Jeffrey Irwin. 2010. “An Explanation of the Relationship between Instructor Humor and Student Learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory.” Communication Education 59(1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattenberg, Martin P. 2012. Is Voting for Young People? Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. 2008. “The Privileged Role of the Late-Night Joke: Exploring Humor’s Role in Disrupting Argument Scrutiny.” Media Psychology 11(1): 119–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Dannagal. 2013. “Laughter, Learning, or Enlightenment? Viewing and Avoidance Motivations Behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57(2): 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. and R. A. Tisinger. 2006. “Dispelling Late-Night Myths: News Consumption Among Late-Night Comedy Viewers and the Predictors of Exposure to Various Late-Night Shows.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11(3): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and G. M. Zinkhan. 2006. “Responses to Humorous Ads: Does Audience Involvement Matter?” Journal of Advertising 35(4): 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar