Beyond Polls: Using Science and Student Data to Stimulate Learning

References

• Aguado, Alexander. 2009. “Teaching Research Methods: Learning by Doing.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 15(2): 251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Christopher, and Lynn Pelco. 2006. “Teaching Research Methods to Undergraduate Psychology Students Using an Active Cooperative Learning Approach.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17(2): 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Balleck, Barry, and Darin Van Tassell. 2004. “Making the World More Relevant for Students: Role Playing Exercises for the Classroom.” Politics & Policy 32(2): 345–381.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael, and Kimberly Weir. 2012. “Power and Politics in the Classroom: The Effect of Student Roles in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 6(3): 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zachary, Kathleen Marchetti, and Benjamin Soltoff. 2015. “What’s the Payoff?: Assessing the Efficacy of Student Response Systems.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(3): 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojinova, Emma, and James Oigara. 2011. “Teaching and Learning with Clickers: Are Clickers Good for Students?” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 7: 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, Charles, and James Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Brynen, Rex. 2010. “(Ending) Civil War in the Classroom: A Peacebuilding Simulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43(1): 145–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Larry, Haeyoun, Park, and Adam Pearce. “You Draw It: What Got Better or Worse During Obama’s Presidency,” The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/15/us/politics/you-draw-obama-legacy.html (January 28, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bycoffe, Aaron, and David Wassweman. 2016. “What Would It Take To Turn Blue States Red?,” FiveThirtyEight, https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-swing-the-election/ (October 16, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Camigan, Patrick. 2010. “Starting with Self: Teaching Autoethnography to Foster Critically Caring Literacies.” Research in the Teaching of English 45(2): 179–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Heewon. 2007. “Autoethnography: Raising Cultural Consciousness of Self and Others.” In Volume 12 of Methodological Developments in Ethnography (Studies in Educational Ethnography), ed. Geoffrey Walford. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Peta. 2014. “To Actually Be Sociological: Autoethnography as an Assessment and Learning Tool.” Journal of Sociology 50(3): 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, Catherine, and Eric Mazur. 2001. “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results.” American Journal of Physics 69(9): 970–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell, Paul Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1998. “Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 92(1): 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, Jeff. 2010. “Using Collaborative Research Projects to Facilitate Active Learning in Methods Courses.” Journal of Faculty Development 24(1): 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Emrey, Jennifer, Alison Howard, and Jocelyn Evans. 2014. “Teaching Better, Teaching Together: A Coordinated Student Exit Poll Across the States.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(4): 471–486.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather. 2012. “Making Politics ‘Click’: The Costs and Benefits of Using Clickers in an Introductory Political Science Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 8(1): 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, William, and Dhavan Shah. 2003. “The Impact of Individual and Interpersonal Factors on Perceived News Media Bias.” Political Psychology 24(1): 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagen, Adam, Catherine Crouch, and Eric Mazur. 2002. “Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms.” The Physics Teacher 40(4): 206–209.
   Google Scholar
• Fechheimer, Marcus, Karen Webber, and Pamela Kleiber. 2011. “How Well Do Undergraduate Research Programs Promote Engagement and Success of Students?” Life Sciences Education 10(2): 156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, Richard, and Rebecca Brent. 2009. “Active Learning: An Introduction.” ASQ Higher Education Brief 2(4). http://asq.org/edu/2009/08/best-practices/active-learning-an-introduction.%20felder.html?shl=093530
   Google Scholar
• Frederking, Brian. 2005. “Simulations and Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1(3): 385–393.
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, Roger, and Shelly Chaiken. 1994. “The Causes of Hostile Media Judgements.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30(2): 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, Peter, and Susan Fiske. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile from Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(3): 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Angel. 2008. “Vibrant Student Voices: Exploring Effects of the Use of Clickers in Large College Courses.” Learning, Media and Technology 33(4): 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, Neil, and William Strauss. 2000. Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Melvin, and Kathleen Perez. 2009. “The Game of Politics Simulation: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Political Science Education 5(4): 332–349.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Jennifer. 2011. “Innovative Activities: How Clickers Can Facilitate the Use of Simulations in Large Lecture Classes.” Technology Innovations in Statistics Education 5(1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lage, Maureen, Glenn Platt, and Michael Treglia. 2000. “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment.” Journal of Economic Education 31(1): 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatto, David. 2009. Science in Solution: The Impact of Undergraduate Research on Student Learning. Tucson, AZ: The Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lopatto, David. 2010. “Undergraduate Research as a High-Impact Student Experience.” Peer Review 12(2): 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Manduca, Cathryn, and David Mogk. 2002. Using Data in Undergraduate Science Classrooms. Northfield, MN: Carleton College Science Education Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Eric. 2009. “Farewell, Lecture?” Science 323(5910): 50–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Patrick, and Liam Anderson. 2000. “Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science.” Innovative Higher Education 24(4): 279–294.
   Google Scholar
• Mollborn, Stefanie, and Angel Hoekstra. 2010. “A Meeting of the Minds: Using Clickers for Critical Thinking and Discussion in Large Sociology Classes.” Teaching Sociology 38(1): 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, Katsuo, and Joseph Jaeger. 2011. “A Computer Simulation Comparing the Incentive Structures of Dictatorships and Democracies.” Journal of Political Science Education 7(2): 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, Deborah, and Jamis Perrett. 2016. “Teaching and Learning Data Visualization: Ideas and Assignments.” The American Statistician 70(3): 260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omelicheva, Mariya, and Olga Avdeyeva. 2008. “Teaching with Lecture or Debate? Testing the Effectiveness of Traditional Versus Active Learning Methods of Instruction.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(2): 603–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros, Andrew. 2007. “Let’s Debate: Active Learning Encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 3(3): 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, Richard. 1989. “Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage.” Communication Research 16(2): 236–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahn, Wendy. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 472–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, Jonathan. 2014. “In-Class Experiments as an Accompaniment to In-Class Discussion.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(4): 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, Sharon, and Janet Simons. 2008. “Engaging Students Through Extended Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 4(3): 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, Mark Carl. 2015. “Numbers, Pictures, and Politics: Teaching Research Methods Through Data Visualizations.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Paul. 2002. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, James, Allison D’Costa, Clay Runck, David Barnes, Alessandra Barrera, Jennifer Hurst-Kennedy, Elizabeth Sudduth, Erin Quinlan, Mark Schlueter, Liliya Iskhakova, and Robert Haining. 2015. “Bridging the Undergraduate Curriculum Using an Integrated Course-Embedded Undergraduate Research Experience (ICURE).” Life Sciences Education 14(1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen, and Kursad Turan. 2006. “Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, Chris. 2012. “The Impact of Simulations on Higher-Level Learning.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 18(2): 397–422.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, Roxanna. 2015. “Assessing a Broad Teaching Approach: The Impact of Combining Active Learning Methods on Student Performance in Undergraduate Peace and Conflict Studies.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(2): 204–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skiba, Diane, and Amy Barton. 2006. “Adapting Your Teaching to Accommodate the Next Generation of Learners.” OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 11(2): 15. http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume112006/No2May06/tpc30_416076.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michelle, William Wood, Wendy Adams, Carl Wieman, Jennifer Knight, Nancy Guild, and Tin Tin Su. 2009. “Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions.” Science 323(5910): 122–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touchton, Michael. 2015. “Flipping the Classroom and Student Performance in Advanced Statistics: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(1): 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, John, Eric Taylor, Thomas Kane, and Amy Wooten. 2010. “Using Student Performance Data to Identify Effective Classroom Practices.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 100(2): 256–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, Robert, Lee Ross, and Mark Lepper. 1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perception of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3): 577–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandiver, Donna, and Jeffrey Walsh. 2010. “Assessing Autonomous Learning in Research Methods Courses: Implementing the Student-Driven Research Project.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11(1): 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Michelle. 2015. “Using Simulations in Linked Courses to Foster Student Understanding of Complex Political Institutions.” Journal of Political Science Education 11(3): 332–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Bruce, Philip Pollock, and Kerstin Hamann. 2007. “Does Active Learning Enhance Learner Outcomes? Evidence from Discussion Participation in Online Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 3(2): 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Winn, Sandra. 1995. “Learning by Doing: Teaching Research Methods Through Student Participation in a Commissioned Research Project.” Studies in Higher Education 20(2): 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, Janice, and Catherine Hochevar. 2005. “Encouraging Active Learning Can Improve Students’ Performance on Examinations.” Teaching of Psychology 32: 91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar