“What’s Positive About Positive Rights?” Students’ Everyday Understandings and the Challenges of Teaching Political Science

References

• Amadeo, Jo-Ann, Judith Torney-Purta, Reiner Lehmann, Vera Husfeldt, and Roumiana Niklova. 2002. Civic Knowledge and Engagement: An IEA Study of Upper Secondary Students in Sixteen Countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Attainment.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Björn, Frank Bach, Birgitta Frändberg, Ingrid Jansson, Christina Kärrqvist, Eva Nyberg, Anita Wallin, and Ann Zetterqvist. 2003. Att Förstå Naturen—Från Vardagsbegrepp Till Fysik: Sex “Workshops.” Göteborg: Inst. för Pedagogik Odidaktik, Göteborgs Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, Elizabeth, Anne Colby, Thomas Ehrlich, and Judith Torney-Purta. 2006. “Promoting Political Competence and Engagement in College Students: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (3):249–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Jeffrey. 2010. “Using “Think-Alouds” to Understand Variations in Political Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 6 (1):49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, John, Linda Darling-Hammond, and Pamela LePage. 2005. “Introduction.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World, eds. L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, Suzanne H., Gale M. Sinatra, and E. Michael Nussbaum. 2013. “‘Pluto Has Been a Planet My Whole Life!’ Emotions, Attitudes, and Conceptual Change in Elementary Students’ Learning about Pluto’s Reclassification” Research in Science Education 43 (2):529–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravita, Silvia, and Ola Halldén. 1994. “Re-Framing the Problem of Conceptual Change.” Learning and Instruction 4:89–111.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, Mario, and Miriam Kriger. 2011. “Historical Representations and Conflicts About Indigenous People as National Identities.” Culture & Psychology 17 (2):177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, John. 2014. “What Have We Been Writing About? Patterns and Trends in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Political Science.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (1):23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, Rosalind, and Jack Easley. 1978. “Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students.” Studies in Science Education 5:61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Elbro, Carsten, and Ida Buch-Iversen. 2013. “Activation of Background Knowledge for Inference Making: Effects on Reading Comprehension.” Scientific Studies of Reading 17 (6):435–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halldén, Ola. 1997. “Conceptual Change and the Learning of History.” International Journal of Educational Research 27 (3):201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Halldén, Ola, Max Scheja, and Liza Haglund. 2013. “The Contextuality of Knowledge: An Intentional Approach to Meaning Making and Conceptual Change.” In International Handbook of Conceptual Change, ed. Stella Vosniadou. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hamerness, Karen, Linda Darling-Hammond, John Bransford, David Berliner, Marilyn Cochran-Smith, Morva McDonald, and Kenneth Zeichner. 2005. “How Teachers Learn and Develop.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World, eds. Linda Darling-Hammond and John Bransford. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 358–389.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, Brenda. 2012. “Understanding the Relative Contributions of Lower-Level Word Processes, Higher-Level Processes, and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension Performance in Proficient Adult Readers.” Reading Research Quarterly 47:125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Theodore Lester, and Richard E. Hodges. 1995. The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth, R. W. 2006. “Teaching and Learning Democracy: An Analysis of Undergraduates’ Lived Experiences of Political Engagement.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (3):285–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hynd, Cynthia. 2001. “Refutational texts and the change process” International Journal of Educational Research 35 (7–8):699–714.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, Maria, Maria Wendt, and Cecilia Åse. 2009. “Teaching Political Science Through Memory Work.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (3):179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, Maria, Maria Wendt, and Cecilia Åse. 2013. “Common-Sense Notions of ‘Nation’: A Challenge for Teaching.” Journal of Political Science Education 9:1, 34–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kostons, Danny, and Greetje van der Werf. 2015. “The Effects of Activating Prior Topic and Metacognitive Knowledge on Text Comprehension Scores.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (3):264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, Steinar. 1996. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Åsa, and Ola Halldén. 2010. “A Structural View on the Emergence of a Conception: Conceptual Change as Radical Reconstruction of Contexts.” Science Education 94:640–664. doi:10.1002/sce.20377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, Tracy, David J. Therriault, and Heekyung Kwon. 2014. “Multiple Science Text Processing: Building Comprehension Skills for College Student Readers.” Reading Psychology 35 (4):332–356.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, John. 2006. Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning About Teaching. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundholm, Cecilia. 2004. “Learning About Environmental Issues in Engineering Programmes. A Case Study of First-Year Civil Engineering Students’ Contextualisations of an Ecology Course.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 5 (3):295–307.
   Google Scholar
• Lundholm, Cecilia, and Peter Davies. 2013. “Conceptual Change in the Social Sciences.” In International Handbook of Conceptual Change, ed. Stella Vosniadou. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 288–304.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Karen, and Patricia Alexander. 2008. “The role of knowledge, beliefs and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research.” In International Handbook of Conceptual Change, ed. Stella Vosniadou. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 583–616.
   Google Scholar
• Murstedt, Linda. 2014. “Lärande, Värderingar och Statsvetenskap: Studenters Tolkningar Av Genus- och Nationsbegreppet.” PhD diss. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, Molly. 2009. “Reading Comprehension Strategies in Secondary Content Area Classrooms: Teacher Use of and Attitudes Towards Reading Comprehension Instruction.” Reading Horizons 49 (2):143–166.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, Cynthia, and Vera Woloshyn. 2013. “Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction in a First-Year Course: An Instructor’s Self-Study.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4 (2): Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, John. 2000. “Introduction.” In Education for Civic Engagement in Democracy, eds. Sheilah Mann and John J. Patrick. Bloomington, IN: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, Thomas M. 2001. “An ‘Ideology in Pieces’ Approach to Studying Change in Teacher Sensemaking About Race, Racism, and Racial Justice.” Cognition and Instruction 29 (3):297–329.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, George J., Kenneth A. Strike, Peter W. Hewson, and William A. Gertzog. 1982. “Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change.” Science Education 66 (21):211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Shtulman, Andrew, and Kelsey Harrington. 2016. “Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan.” Topics in Cognitive Science 8:118–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtulman, Andrew, and Joshua Valcarcel. 2012. “Scientific Knowledge Suppresses but Does Not Supplant Earlier Intuitions.” Cognition 124:209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, Gale M., 2005. “The ‘warming trend’ in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2):104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, M. Gale, and Suzanne H. Broughton. 2011. “Bridging Reading Comprehension and Conceptual Change in Science Education: The Promise of Refutation Text.” Reading Research Quarterly 46 (4):374–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, M. Gale, and Lucia Mason. 2013. “Beyond Knowledge: Learner Characteristics Influencing Conceptual Change.” In International Handbook of Conceptual Change, ed. Stella Vosniadou. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, Catherine, and Connie Juel. 2005. “Teaching Children to Read: What Do We Know About How to Do It?” In The Science of Reading: A Handbook, eds. Margaret Snowling and Charles Hulme. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 501–520.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, Paul, and Panayiota Kendeou. 2008. “Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts: The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22:335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, Stella, and William F. Brewer. 1992. “Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood.” Cognitive Psychology 24:535–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, Stella, and William F. Brewer. 1994. “Mental models of the day/night cycle.” Cognitive Science 18 (1):123–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, Stella. (ed.). 2008. International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, Karolina. 2005. “Concept Formation in Environmental Education: 14-Year Olds’ Work on the Intensified Greenhouse Effect and the Depletion of the Ozone Layer.” International Journal of Science Education 27:891–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar