War and Peace in International Relations Theory: A Classroom Simulation

References

• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6:359–373. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00213.x
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2:1–18. doi:10.1080/15512160500484119
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Jayson Kratoville. 2013. “Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the Pedagogy of IR Simulations through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):132–143. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.770982
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, Chad Raymond, and Simon Usherwood. 2015. “War, Peace and Everything in Between: Simulations in International Relations.” In Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, eds. John Ishiyama, William J. Miller, and Eszter Simon. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 304–314.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38 (1):226–254. doi:10.2307/2010357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael K., and Kimberly A. Weir. 2015. “Political Simulations: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4):391–403. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1065748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion, Elizabeth A. 2015. “Experiential Education in Political Science and International Relations.” In Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, eds. John Ishiyama, William J. Miller, and Eszter Simon. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 351–368.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Benjamin S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Philadelphia: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Mark A., and Elizabeth T. Smith. 2015. “Developing Your Own In-Class Simulations: Design Advice and a ‘Commons’ Simulation Example.” In Handbook on Teaching and Learning in Political Science and International Relations, eds. John Ishiyama, William J. Miller, and Eszter Simon. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, Pam. 2013. “Active Learning Strategies for Diverse Learning Styles: Simulations Are Only One Method.” Political Science and Politics 46 (4):818–822. doi:10.1017/s1049096513001145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, Karl W., and J. David Singer. 1964. “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability.” World Politics 16:390–406. doi:10.2307/2009578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):205–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, Susan, Josh Pallas, and Sarah Lambert. 2017. “Model United Nations and Deep Learning: Theoretical and Professional Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2):171–184. doi:10.1080/15512169.2016.1250644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, James. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (3):379–414. doi:10.1017/s0020818300033324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederking, Brian. 2005. “Simulations and Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):385–393. doi:10.1080/15512160500261236
   Google Scholar
• Giovanello, Sean P., Jason A. Kirk, and Mileah K. Kromer. 2013. “Student Perceptions of a Role-Playing Simulation in an Introductory International Relations Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):197–208. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.770989
   Google Scholar
• Glazier, Rebecca A. 2011. “Running Simulations Without Ruining Your Life: Simple Ways to Incorporate Active Learning into Your Teaching.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (4):375–393. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.615188
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42 (3):485–507. doi:10.1017/s0020818300027715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2015. “Must International Studies Be a Science?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (3):942–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30 (2):167–214. doi:10.2307/2009958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.” International Security 24 (1):42–63. doi:10.1162/016228899560040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanner, Michael D. 2007. “War and Peace: Simulating Security Decision Making in the Classroom.” Political Science & Politics 40 (4):795–800. doi:10.1017/s1049096507071259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. Systems and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., ed. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kille, Kent J., Matthew Krain, and Jeffrey S. Lantis. 2008. “Active Learning Across Borders: Lessons from an Interactive Workshop in Brazil.” International Studies Perspectives 9:411–429. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2008.00345.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina A., and Amanda M. Rosen. 2013. “Simulations as Active Assessment?: Typologizing by Purpose and Source.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):144–156. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.770983
   Google Scholar
• Lunce, Les M. 2006. “Simulations: Bringing the Benefits of Situated Learning to the Traditional Classroom.” Journal of Applied Educational Technology 3 (1):37–45.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, Daniel. 2001. “The Uses and Limits of the Model United Nations in an International Relations Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 2:269–280. doi:10.1111/1528-3577.00057
   Google Scholar
• Mealy, Kimberly A. 2013. “2013 APSA Teaching and Learning Conference and Track Summaries.” PS: Political Science and politics 46 (3):643–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. 1994–1995. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19 (3):5–49. doi:10.2307/2539078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, David Thornton. 2013. Engaged Learning in the Academy: Challenges and Possibilities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4):513–553. doi:10.1162/002081898550536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pettenger, Mary, Douglas West, and Niki Young. 2014. “Assessing the Impact of Role Play Simulations on Learning in Canadian and US Classrooms.” International Studies Perspectives 15:491–508. doi:10.1111/insp.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad, and Simon Usherwood. 2013. “Assessment in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):157–167. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.770984
   Google Scholar
• Saiya, Nilay. 2016. “The Statecraft Simulation and Foreign Policy Attitudes Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (1):58–71. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1063439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kursad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2:19–32. doi:10.1080/15512160500484168
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Archie W., and Bernd Kaussler. 2009. “IR Teaching Reloaded: Using Films and Simulations in the Teaching of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 10:413–427. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Elizabeth, and Mark Boyer. 1996. “Designing in-Class Simulations.” Political Science & Politics 29 (4):690–694. doi:10.1017/s1049096500045686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkey, Brigid A., and Elizabeth L. Blake. 2001. “Simulating in International Relations Education.” Simulation & Gaming 32 (4):537–551. doi:10.1177/104687810103200409
   Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M. 1985. “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power.” International Security 9 (4):3–43. doi:10.2307/2538540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1964. “The Stability of a Bipolar World.” Daedalus 93 (3):881–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wedig, Timothy. 2010. “Getting the Most from Classroom Simulations: Strategies for Maximizing Learning Outcomes.” Political Science & Politics 43 (3):547–555. doi:10.1017/s104909651000079x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2):391–425. doi:10.1017/s0020818300027764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar