American Politics Course Redesigns: The Effect of Propensity Score Matching on Predicting Learning Outcomes

References

• Abadie, A., D. Drukker, J. L. Herr, and G. W. Imbens. 2004. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata.” Stata Journal 4 (3):290–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, Alberto, and Guido W. Imbens. 2006. “On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators.” Technical Working Paper 325, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/T0325. Last accessed 24 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Tessa M., Michael J. Leonard, Clinton A. Colgrove, and Steven T. Kalinowski. 2011. “Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 10 (4): 394–405.
   Google Scholar
• Arends, Richard. 2015. Learning to Teach. 10th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ausburn, Lynna. 2004. “Gender and Learning Strategy Differences in Nontraditional Adult Students’ Design Preferences in Hybrid Distance Courses.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 3 (2):1–17. http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v3/n2. Last accessed 24 January 2017
   Google Scholar
• Barabas, Jason. 2004. “How Deliberation Affects Policy Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 98 (4):687–701. doi:10.1017/S0003055404041425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Dan A., and Jeffrey A. Smith. 2004. “How Robust is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching.” Journal of Econometrics 121 (1-2):99–124. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Henry E., and John E. McNulty. 2011. “Turning Out to Vote: The Costs of Finding and Getting to the Polling Place.” American Political Science Review 105 (1):115–134. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, Stephen D. 1991. Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Burgan, Mary. 2006. ‘‘In Defense of Lecturing.’’ Change 38 (6):30–34. doi:10.3200/CHNG.38.6.30-34
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, Marco, and Sabine Kopenig. 2008. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1):31–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, David. 2008. “Voice in the Classroom: How an Open Classroom Climate Fosters Political Engagement Among Adolescents.” Political Behavior 30:437–454. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. H., and Nicole L. Cundiff. 2011. “Assessing the Effectiveness of a College Freshman Seminar Using Propensity Score Adjustments.” Research in Higher Education 53 (6):616–639.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. Margaret. 1998. Political Participation in the United States. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1993. “Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4):1179–1206. doi:10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, David P., and Ryan B. Cartnal. 1999. “Students’ Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus.” College Teaching 47 (4):130–135. doi:10.1080/87567559909595802
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, Robert H. 1985. “A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills.” Educational Leadership 25 (2):44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, Robert H. 1993. “Critical Thinking Assessment.” Theory into Practice 32 (3):179–196. doi:10.1080/00405849309543594
   Google Scholar
• Exley, Kate, and Reg Dennik. 2009. Giving a Lecture: From Presenting to Teaching. Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Garside, Colleen. 1995. “Look Who’s Talking: A Comparison of Lecture and Group Discussion Teaching Strategies in Developing Critical Thinking Skills.” Communication Education 45 (3):212–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, Kerstin, Phillip H. Pollock, and Bruce M. Wilson. 2012. “Assessing Student Perceptions of the Benefits of Discussion in Small-Group, Large-Class, and Online Learning Contexts.” College Teaching 60 (2):65–75. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.633407
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Guanglei, and Stephen W Raudenbush. 2006. “Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (475):901–910. doi:10.1198/016214506000000447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, Guido W. 2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1):4–29. doi:10.1162/003465304323023651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, and Richard Nielson. 2016. Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching. Accessed from http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/psnot.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koh, Harold Hongju. 2003. “On American Exceptionalism.” Stanford Law Review 55 (5):1479–1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousser, Thad, and Megan Mullin. 2007. “Does Voting by Mail Increase Participation? Using Matching to Analyze a Natural Experiment.” Political Analysis 15 (4):428–445. doi:10.1093/pan/mpm014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1995. “Trade Union Exceptionalism: The United States and Canada.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 538:115–130. doi:10.1177/0002716295538000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Michael P. 2008. “Fostering Scholarly Discussion and Critical Thinking in the Political Science Classroom.” Journal of Political Science Education 4 (2):204–224.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, Mark K., and Shea K. Robison. 2012. “Introduction to American Government: What is it Good For? Absolutely Everything.” Journal of Political Science Education 8:271–287. doi:10.1080/15512169.2012.695978
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. Patrick, and Liam Anderson. 2000. “Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science.” Innovative Higher Education 24 (6):279–284.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, Meghan P., Erin E. O’Conner, Elise Cappella, and Sandee G. McClowry. 2013. “Teacher-Child Relationships and Academic Achievement: A Multilevel Propensity Score Model Approach”. Journal of School Psychology 51 (5):611–624. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J., P. R. Pintrich, Y. G. Lin, and D. A. F. Smith. 1986. Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan Publication.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, John E., Conor M. Dowling, and Margaret H. Ariotti. 2009. “Driving Saints to Sin: How Increasing the Difficulty of Voting Dissuades Even the Most Motivated Voters.” Political Analysis 17 (4):435–455. doi:10.1093/pan/mpp014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J., and Anne Statham. 2005. “Critical Thinking in Political Science; Evidence from the Introductory Comparative Politics Course.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):323–344. doi:10.1080/15512160500261186
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, Dean. 1984. “Designing Alternative Teaching Approaches (Feedback Lecture) through the Use of Guided Decision-Making.” In Instructional Development: The State of the Art, eds. Robert K. Bass and Charles R. Dills, Vol. 2. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. (ED 298 903).
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Phillip H., Kerstin Hamann, and Bruce Wilson. 2009. “Learning Through Discussion: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Setting.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1):48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Along: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Rocca, Kelly A. 2010. “Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review.” Communication Education 59 (2):185–213. doi:10.1080/03634520903505936
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Donald B., Elizabeth Stuart, and Elaine L. Zanutto. 2004. “A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29 (1):103–116. doi:10.3102/10769986029001103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:487–508. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, Robert H. 2005. “Get Them to Read, Get Them to Talk: Using Discussion Forums to Enhance Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1(3): 289–322. doi:10.1080/15512160500261178
   Google Scholar
• West, Stephen G., and Felix Thoemmes. 2010. “Campbell's and Rubin's Perspectives on Causal Inference.” Psychological Methods 15 (1):18–37. doi:10.1037/a0015917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar