Inspiring Students to Think Theoretically About International Relations Through the Game of Diplomacy

References

• Adler, Emanuel, and Michael, Barnett, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alker, Hayward R. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Richard. 2015. “Where's the Diplomacy in Diplomacy? Using a Classic Board Game to Teach Introduction to International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1):162–166. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6:359–373.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth L. Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/15512160500484119.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, David, and Simon Radford. 2014. “Teaching Diplomacy by Other Means: Using an Outside-of-Class Simulation to Teach International Relations Theory.” International Studies Perspectives 15:423–437. doi:10.1111/insp.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Kevin A., and David M. Primo. 2012. A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim, Lene Hansen, and Colin Wight. 2013. “The End of International Relations Theory?” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3):405–425. doi:10.1177/1354066113495485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt, George. 2008. “Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: Making Game Theory a Useful Part of Undergraduate International Relations Classes.” International Studies Perspectives 9:57–74. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00316.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierke, Karin. 2007. Critical Approaches to International Security. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, David. 2014. “The Board Game of the Alpha Nerds.” Grantland. Accessed June 18, 2014. http://grantland.com/features/diplomacy-the-board-game-of-the-alpha-nerds/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Mary M. 2014. “The Role of Games and Simulations to Teach Abstract Concepts of Anarchy, Cooperation, and Conflict in World Politics.” Journal of Political Science Education 10:400–413. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.947417.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Harald. 2004. “Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (3):395–435. doi:10.1177/1354066104045542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2015. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, Ariel. 2016. “Comments on Economic Models, Economics and Economists: Remarks on Economics Rules by Dani Rodrik.” Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, Mark B. 2011. “The Geographical Imaginations of Video Games: Diplomacy, Civilization, America’s Army and Grant Theft Auto IV.” Geopolitics 16:359–388. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.538875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kursad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2:19–32. doi:10.1080/15512160500484168.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Richard. 1978. The Game of Diplomacy. Accessed June 1, 2014. http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/resources/god/intro.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. Ann. 2013. “A Critique of Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism.” In International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues, 11th ed., eds. Robert Art and Robert Jervis. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. 1997. “Evaluating Theories.” The American Political Science Review 91 (4):913–917. doi:10.2307/2952173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watters, Ethan. 2013. “We Aren’t the World.” Pacific Standard: The Science of Society. Accessed March 1, 2013. http://www.psmag.com/magazines/magazine-feature-story-magazines/joe-henrich-weird-ultimatum-game-shaking-up-psychology-economics-53135/
   Google Scholar
• Weldes, Jutta. 1999. Constructing National Interests: the United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20 (1):71–81. doi:10.2307/2539217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar