2,350
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Political Science Instruction

Gallery Walk Seminar: Visualizing the Future of Political Ideologies

Pages 91-100 | Received 12 Mar 2018, Accepted 06 Nov 2018, Published online: 18 Feb 2019

References

  • Bacchi, Carol. 2012. “Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible. Open Journal of Political Science 2 (1):1. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2012.21001.
  • Baylouny, Anne Marie. 2009. “Seeing other Sides: Nongame Simulations and Alternative Perspectives of Middle East conflict.” Journal of Political Science Education 5 (3):214–232. doi: 10.1080/15512160903035658.
  • Bloom, Benjamin S., and Committee of College and University Examiners. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Vol. 2). New York: Longmans, Green.
  • Chin, Chee Keong, Kwan Hooi Khor, and Tiam Kian Teh. (2015). Is Gallery Walk an Effective Teaching and Learning Strategy for Biology? In Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet, ed. Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini Daniel (pp.55–59). Singapore: Springer.
  • Diller, Ann. 2018. The Gender Question in Education: Theory, Pedagogy, and Politics. London: Routledge.
  • Francek, Mark. 2006. “Promoting Discussion in the Science Classroom Using Gallery Walks.” Journal of College Science Teaching, 36 (1):27.
  • Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A Very Short Introduction (Vol. 95). Oxford University Press.
  • Gerring, John. 1997. “Ideology: A Definitional Analysis.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (4):957–994. doi: 10.1177/106591299705000412.
  • Heywood, Andrew. 2017. Political Ideologies: An introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jost, John T., Brian A. Nosek, and Samuel D. Gosling. 2008. “Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (2):126–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x.
  • Kahan, Dan M. 2013. “Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study.” Judgment and Decision Making, 8,407–424.
  • Karlsson, Rasmus. 2005. “Why the Far-Future Matters to Democracy Today.” Futures 37 (10):1095–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.02.007.
  • Kaufman-Osborn, T. V. (2010). Political theory as profession and as subfield? Political Research Quarterly, 63 (3):655–673.
  • Laurillard, Diana. 2002. Rethinking University Teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.
  • Laurillard, Diana. 2013. Teaching As a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. London: Routledge.
  • March, Andrew F. 2009. What is comparative political theory? The Review of Politics 71 (4):531–565. doi: 10.1017/S0034670509990672.
  • Oros, Andrew L. 2007. Let's debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education 3 (3):293–311. doi: 10.1080/15512160701558273.
  • Steger, Manfred B. 2008. The rise of the global imaginary: Political ideologies from the French revolution to the global war on terror. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Symons, Jonathan, & Rasmus Karlsson. (2018). Ecomodernist citizenship: Rethinking political obligations in a climate-changed world. Citizenship Studies, 22 (7):685–704.
  • von Glasersfeld, Ernst. 1995. “A Constructivist Approach to Teaching.” In Constructivism in Education eds. L.Steffe & J.Gale. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,3–16.
  • Wetherly, Paul. 2017. Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.