311
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

Using Campus Presidential Debate Watch Events to Nudge: Enlisting Reference Group Leaders and Incentives in the Quest for Increasing Student Political Participation and Efficacy

Pages 176-197 | Received 15 Jun 2017, Accepted 24 Oct 2018, Published online: 20 Jan 2019

References

  • Bakker, Tom P., and De Vreese, Claes H. 2011. “Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation.” Communication research 38 (4):451–470. doi: 10.1177/0093650210381738.
  • Beaumont, Elizabeth; Colby, Anne; Ehrlich, Thomas and Judith Torney-Purta. 2006. “Promoting Political Competence and Engagement in College Students: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (3):249–270. doi:10.1080/15512160600840467.
  • Beom, Khisu, Diana B. Carlin, and Mark D. Silver. 2005. “The World was watching—And Talking: International Perspectives on the 2004 Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (2):243–264. doi:10.1177/0002764205279395.
  • Bergom, Inger. 2016. Campus Stories: What Are Higher Education Institutions Doing to Increase Political Learning and Engagement? Institute for Democracy and Higher Education Report. Available: http://activecitizen.tufts.edu/wp-content/uploads/IDHE-Report-CampusStories.pdf
  • Britt, Thomas W. 2003. “Motivational and Emotional Consequences of Self-Engagement: Voting in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.” Motivation and Emotion 27 (4):339–358.
  • Ehman, Lee H. 1980. “The American School in the Political Socialization Process.” Review of Educational Research 50 (1):99–119. doi:10.3102/00346543050001099.
  • Finkel, Steven E. 1985. “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political efficacy: A Panel Analysis.” American Journal of political science 29 (4): 891–913. doi:10.2307/2111186.
  • Gallup-Purdue Index Study. 2014. Fraternities and Sororities: Understanding Life Outcomes. Washington, DC: Gallup. Available: https://www.gallup.com/services/176279/fraternities-sororities-understanding-life-outcomes.aspx
  • Houston, J. Brian, McKinney, Mitchell. S., Hawthorne, Joshua, and Matthew L. Spialek. 2013. “Frequency of Tweeting During Presidential Debates: Effect on Debate Attitudes and Knowledge.” Communication Studies 64 (5):548–560. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832693.
  • Howard, Leigh Anne and Brian D. Posler. 2012. “Reframing Political Messages: Using a Festival to Reach Young Voters.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (4):389–407. doi:10.1080/15512169.2012.729446.
  • Huddy, Leonie, David O.Sears, and Jack S.Levy, 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hyman, Herbert H., Charles R. Wright, and Terence K. Hopkins. 1968. “Reference Groups and the Maintenance of Changes in Attitudes and Behavior.” In Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, eds. H. H. Hyman and E. Singer. New York: The Free Press, 387–393.
  • John, Peter, Elizabeth MacDonald, and Michael Sanders. 2015. “Targeting Voter Registration with Incentives: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Lottery in a London Borough.” Electoral Studies 40: 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.007.
  • John, Peter, Graham Smith, and Gerry Stoker. 2009. “Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour.” The Political Quarterly 80 (3):361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.x.
  • Kaid, Lynda Lee, McKinney, Mitchell. S., and John C. Tedesco. 2007. “Introduction: Political Information Efficacy and Young Voters.” American Behavioral Scientist 50 (9):1093–1111. doi:10.1177/0002764207300040.
  • Kaplan, Norman. 1968. “Reference Groups and Interest Group Theories of Voting.” In Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, eds. H. H. Hyman and E. Singer. New York: The Free Press, 461–472.
  • Kenski, Kate and Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2006. “Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation.” Journal of broadcasting & electronic media 50 (2):173–192. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1.
  • Kushin, Mathew J., and Masahiro Yamamoto. 2010. “Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5):608–630. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516863.
  • La Raja, Raymond J., and Brian F. Schaffner. 2012. Buying Voters: The Effect of Financial Incentives on Intentions to Vote. APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at: SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract¼2109019.
  • Lee, Kwan M. 2006. “Effects of Internet Use on College Students' Political Efficacy.” Cyberpsychology and behavior 9 (4):415–422. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.415.
  • McKinney, Mitchell S., and Benjamin R. Warner. 2013. “Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects.” Argumentation & Advocacy 49 (4):238–258. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821800.
  • National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE). 2016. College Student Voting Data 2012 Election. Institute for Democracy and Higher Education, Tufts University. Available: http://activecitizen.tufts.edu/wp-content/uploads/NSLVE-VotingByMajor.pdf
  • Newcomb, Theodore M. 1968. “Attitude Development as a Function of Reference Groups: The Bennington Study.” In Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, eds. H. H. Hyman and E. Singer. New York: The Free Press, 374–386.
  • Niemi, Richard G., and Michael J. Hanmer. 2010. “Voter Turnout Among College Students: New Data and a Rethinking of Traditional Theories.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (2):301–323. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00694.x.
  • Panagopoulos, Costas. 2012. “Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation and Voting.” The Journal of Politics 75 (1):266–280. doi:10.1017/S0022381612001016.
  • Pollock III, Philip. H. 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A research note.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (3):400–409. doi:10.2307/448398.
  • Scheufele, Dietram A., and Matthew C. Nisbet. 2002. “Being a Citizen Online: New Opportunities and Dead Ends.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7 (3):55–75. doi:10.1177/1081180X0200700304.
  • Siegel, Alberta and Sidney Siegel. 1968. “Reference Groups, Membership Groups, and Attitude Change.” In Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, eds. H. H. Hyman and E. Singer. New York: The Free Press, 394–401.
  • Sunstein, Cass and Richard Thaler. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Tedesco, John C. 2011. Political Information Efficacy and Internet Effects in the 2008 US Presidential Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 696–713. doi:10.1177/0002764211398089.
  • Thaler, Richard H., Cass R. Sunstein, and John P. Balz. 2014. “Choice Architecture.” In The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, Ch. 24, edited by Eldar Shafir, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2536504 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2536504
  • Thomas, Nancy, Inger Bergom, Ishara Casellas Connors, Prabhat Gautam, Adam Gismondi, and Alena Roshko. (2017). Democracy counts: A report on U.S. college and university student voting. Institute for Democracy & Higher Education, Tufts University’s Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2014. Report Number: P20-577. Available: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/voting-and-registration/p20-577.html
  • Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.