Teaching Ethics Using Simulations: Active Learning Exercises in Political Theory

References

• Ahmadov, Anar. 2011. “When Great Minds Don't Think Alike: Using Mock Trials in Teaching Political Thought.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (3):625–628. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511000722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (3):359–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00213.x.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Elizabeth L. Blake. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/15512160500484119.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor, and Marcus Schulzke. 2012. “A Shot Not Taken: Teaching About the Ethics of Political Violance.” International Studies Perspectives 13 (4):408–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00487.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael K., and Kimberly A. Weir. 2015. “Political Simulations: What We Know, What we Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4):391–403. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2015.1065748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, Michael. 2006. “Single Session Simulations: The Effectiveness of Short Congressional Simulations in Introductory American Government Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):33–49. doi: 10.1080/15512160500484135.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, Max H., and Ann E. Tenbrunsel. 2011. Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What's Right and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgun, Keith. 2015. Clockwork Game Design. New York and London: Focal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgun, Keith. 2013. Game Design Theory: A New Philosophy to Understand Games. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, Mark C. 2014. Minds on Fire: How Role-Immersion Games Transform College. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, Michele D. 2005. “Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (2):67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, Michele D. 2007.“Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation.” Educational Technology Research and Development 55(3): 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druliolle, Vincent. 2017. “There is No Debriefing Without Prior Briefing: Writing a Briefing Memo as a Preparatory Activity to Make the Most of the Pedagogical Potential of Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (3):355–363. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2017.1331850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, George Skaff, Richard Garfield, and K. Robert Gutschera. 2012. Characteristics of Games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emenaker, Ryan. 2014. “Pinning Down the Constitution: Interactively Teaching Congress's Power, Federalism, and Constitutional Interpretation.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (4):443–452. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2014.947418.
   Google Scholar
• Engelstein, Geoffrey. 2017. GameTek: The Math and Science of Gaming. USA: Ludology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederking, Brian. 2005. “Simulations and Students Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3):385–393. doi: 10.1080/15512160500261236.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, James Paul. 2004. What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1145/950566.950595.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, Mary C. 2010. Giving Voice to Values: How to Speak Your Mind When You Know What's Right. New Haven: Yale Univerisity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorton, William, and Jonathan Havercroft. 2012. “Using Historical Simulations to Teach Political Theory.” Journal of Political Science Education 8 (1):50–68. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2012.641399.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan. 2013. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, Clint. 2009. “Ludonarrative Dissoance in Bioshock: The Problem of What the Game is About.” In Well Played 1.0: Video Games, Value and Meaning, edited by Drew Davidson, 255–262. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juul, Jesper. 2011. Half-Real: Video Games Between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA and London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juul, Jesper. 2013. The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, Stephen M., and Ben Nelson. 2017. Building the Intentional University: Minerva and the Future of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA and London, England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Josh. 2014. Making Democracy Fun: How Game Design Can Empower Citizens and Transform Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Banchik, Luba. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Rention, With and Without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3):341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Sally, and Kathy Ahern. 2002. “Physical and Emotional Effects of Whistleblowing.” Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 40 (1):14–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oros, Andrew L. 2007. “Let's Debate: Active Learning Encourages Students Participation and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 3 (3):293–311. doi: 10.1080/15512160701558273.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad, and Simon Usherwood. 2013. “Assessment in Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2):157–176. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.770984.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, Katie, and Eric Zimmerman. 2004. Rules of Play. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, Stephen M., and Kursad Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Ehance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2:19–32. doi: 10.1080/15512160500484168.
   Google Scholar
• Stangl, Chris, Henrik M. Schatzinger, Christopher J. Schaefer, and Ryan Emenaker. 2011. “2011 APSA Teaching and Learning Conference Track Summaries: Track: Simulations and Role Play I: American Politics and Institutions.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (3):664–665. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedig, Timothy. 2010. “Getting the Most from Classroom Simulations: Strategies for Maximizing Learning Outcomes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (3):547–555. doi: 10.1017/S104909651000079X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, Stewart. 2012. Eurogames: The Design, Culture, and Play of Modern European Board Games. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ypi, Lea. 2009. "On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory." The Journal of Poltiical Philosophy 17 (3):332–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Eric. 2013. Designer Diary: Cruel, Cruel galaxy, or Designing Quantum's Mechanics. Board Game Geek, October 22. Accessed 01 29, 2018. https://www.boardgamegeek.com/blogpost/24083/designer-diary-cruel-cruel-galaxy-or-designing-qua.
   Google Scholar