Assessing Bias in the Statecraft IR Simulation

References

• Ben-Yehuda Eliezer, Luba Levin-Banchik, and Chanan Naveh. 2015. World Politics Simulations in a Global Information Age. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brathwaite, Brenda, and Ian Schreiber. 2009. Challenges for Game Designers. Scarborough, Ontario: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Gustavo. 2014. “Rejoinder.” International Studies Perspectives 15(4):564–565. doi:10.1111/insp.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Gustavo. 2014. “Virtual Worlds Can Be Dangerous: Using Ready-Made Computer Simulations for Teaching International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 15(4):538–557. doi:10.1111/insp.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby, Anne, Elizabeth Beaumont, Thomas Ehrlich, and Josh Corngold. 2010. Educating for Democracy: Preparing Undergraduates for Responsible Political Engagement. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Eric. 2014. “Review of Statecraft Online Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 10(2):243–244.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, Jason. 2015. “Playing geopolitics: utopian simulations and subversions of international relations”. GeoJournal 80(6):909–923. doi:10.1007/s10708-015-9655-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, Mervyn. 2012. “On Teaching Ethics in International Relations: Questions and Answers”. International Studies Perspectives 13(1):7–9. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00450.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, Mark. 2012. “The Problem with Teaching: Ethics”. International Studies Perspectives 13(1):13–15. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00446.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbour, Frances V. 2012. “Teaching International Ethics: 1985 and Today”. International Studies Perspectives 13(1):16–20. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2013. “Thematic Issue: Simulations in Political Science”. Journal of Political Science Education 9 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Jonathan W. 2014. “Misusing Virtual Worlds Can Be Dangerous: A Response to Carvahlo.” International Studies Perspectives 15(4):558–563. doi:10.1111/insp.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly-Woessner April and Matthew C. Woessner. 2006. “My Professor is a Partisan Hack: How Perceptions of a Professor’s Political Views Affect Student Course Evaluations”. PS: Political Science & Politics 39(3):495–501. doi:10.1017/S104909650606080X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertzer, Joshua. D. and Kathleen M. McGraw. 2012. “Folk Realism: Testing the Microfoundations of Realism in Ordinary Citizens”. International Studies Quarterly, 56(2):245–58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00715.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollars, Nina A., Amanda M. Rosen. 2013. “Simulations as Active Assessment? Typologizing by Purpose and Source.” Journal of Political Science Education 9(2):144–156. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.770983.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma, Lynn M. and Patrick J. Haney. 2001. “And….Action! Using Film to Learn about Foreign Policy.” International Studies Perspectives 2(1):33–50. doi:10.1111/1528-3577.00036.
   Google Scholar
• Levintova, Ekaternina, Terri Johnson, Denise Scheberle, and Devin Vonck. 2011. “Global Citizens Are Made, Not Born: Multiclass Role-Playing Simulation of Global Decision Making.” Journal of Political Science Education 7(3):245–274. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.590075.
   Google Scholar
• Linantud, John and Joanna Kaftan. 2018. “The Statecraft Effect: Assessment, Attitudes, and Academic Honesty”. Journal of Political Science Education 15(1):64–81. published online 8/10/18. doi:10.1080/15512169.2018.1476253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbach, Richard W. 2012. “Integrating Normative Theory in Teaching International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 13(1):10–12. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, Paul and Mark Rom. 2015. “Fair and Balanced? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Bias in Grading.” American Politics Research 4(3):536–554. doi:10.1177/1532673X14561655.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, Chad. 2014. “Can’t Get No (Dis) Satisfaction: The Statecraft Simulation’s Effect on Student Decision Making”. Journal of Political Science Education 10(3):302–314. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.921624.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, David. L. 2006. Identifying Threats and Threatening Identities: The Social Construction of Realism and Liberalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saiya, Nilay. 2016. “The Statecraft Simulation and Foreign Policy Attitudes Among Undergraduate Students.” Journal of Political Science Education 12(1):58–71. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1063439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiya, Nilay. 2017. “How Dangerous Are Virtual Worlds Really? A Research Note on the Statecraft Simulation Debate. Social Science Computer Review 35(2):287–296. doi:10.1177/0894439315607019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Penny M. and Judy A. Siguaw. 2000. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: An Exploratory Study of the Faculty Response”. Journal of Marketing Education 22(3):199–213. doi:10.1177/0273475300223004.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hayden J. and Niall Michelsen. 2017. “Pursuing Ideology with Statecraft”. Journal of Political Science Education 13(3):317–332. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1307759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar