147
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pedagogical and Curricular Innovations

Research-oriented Studies in Political Science: How Research Collaboration Shapes Southeast European Student Learning Preferences

Pages 31-46 | Received 03 Nov 2022, Accepted 22 Mar 2023, Published online: 11 Apr 2023

References

  • Adriaensen, Johan, Evelyn Coremans, and Bart Kerremans. 2014. “Overcoming Statistics Anxiety: Towards the Incorporation of Quantitative Methods in Non-methodological Courses.” European Political Science 13 (3):251–265. doi:10.1057/eps.2014.8.
  • Andersen, Kristi, and Dana M. Harsell. 2005. “Assessing the Impact of a Quantitative Skills Course for Undergraduates.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (1):17–27. doi:10.1080/15512160490921824.
  • Anson, Ian G. 2021. “Goal Orientation in Political Science Research Instruction.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (sup1):403–420. doi:10.1080/15512169.2020.1791144.
  • Azizi, Abdulla, Alfred Marleku, and Ridvan Peshkopia. 2023. “The Disruptive Role of Private Higher Education in the Western Balkans.” In Government Response to Disruptive Innovation: Perspectives and Examinations, eds. Sam Edwards and James Masterson. Hershey, PS: IGI Global (forthcoming).
  • Bauer, Daniel J., Daniel M. McNeish, Scott A. Baldwin, and Patrick J. Curran. 2020. “Analyzing Nested Data: Multilevel Modeling and Alternative Approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology, eds. Aidan G. C. Wright and Michael N. Hallquist. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 426–443. doi:10.1017/9781316995808.039.
  • Bergbower, Matthew L. 2017. “When Are Students Ready for Research Methods? A Curriculum Mapping Argument for the Political Science Major.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (2):200–210. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1292917.
  • Bernstein, Jeffery L., and Brooke T. Allen. 2013. “Overcoming Methods Anxiety: Qualitative First, Quantitative Next, Frequent Feedback along the Way.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (1):1–15. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.747830.
  • Boban, Davor, and Ivan Stanojevic. 2021. “The Institutionalisation of Political Science in Post-Yugoslav States: Continuities and New Beginnings.” In Opportunities and Challenges for New and Peripheral Political Science Communities: A Consolidated Discipline?, eds. Gabriella Ilonszki and Cristophe Roux. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 281.
  • Bos, Angela L., and Monica C. Schneider. 2009. “Stepping around the Brick Wall: Overcoming Student Obstacles in Methods Courses.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2):375–383. doi:10.1017/S1049096509090519.
  • Brown, Reva B., and Sean McCartney. 1998. “The Link between Research and Teaching: Its Purpose and Implications.” Innovations in Education and Training International 35 (2):117–129. doi:10.1080/1355800980350205.
  • Buchler, Justin. 2009. “Teaching Quantitative Methodology to the Math Averse.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (3):527–530. doi:10.1017/S1049096509090842.
  • Cassese, Erin C., Mirya R. Holman, Monica C. Schneider, and Angela L. Bos. 2015. “Building a Gender and Methodology Curriculum: Integrated Skills, Exercises, and Practices.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1):61–77. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.985106.
  • Clawson, Rosalee, Aaron Hoffman, and James A. McCann. 2001. “If We Only Knew Then What We Know Now: A Few Reflections on Teaching Undergraduate Quantitative Methods Courses.” The Political Methodologist 10 (1):4–5.
  • Druckman, James N. 2015. “Merging Research and Undergraduate Teaching in Political Behavior Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48(1):53–57. doi:10.1017/S1049096514001607.
  • Elken, Mari, and Sabine Wollscheid. 2016. The Relationship between Research and Education: Typologies and Indicators. A Literature Review. Vol. 8. Oslo, NO: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.
  • Fisher, Sarah, and Florian Justwan. 2018. “Scaffolding Assignments and Activities for Undergraduate Research Methods.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (1):63–71. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1367301.
  • Harland, Tony. 2016. “Teaching to Enhance Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 35 (3):461–472. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1107876.
  • Healey, Mick. 2005. “Linking Research and Teaching to Benefit Student Learning.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 29(2):183–201. doi:10.1080/03098260500130387.
  • Hill, Kim Q. 2002. “The Lamentable State of Science Education in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (1):113–116. doi:10.1017/S1049096502000252.
  • Hubbell, Larry. 1994. “Teaching Research Methods: An Experiential and Heterodoxical Approach.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (1):60–64. doi:10.2307/420460.
  • Huber, Ludwig. 2013. “Warum forschendes lernen nötig und möglich ist.” In Forschendes lernen im studium. Aktuelle konzepte und erfahrungen, eds. Ludwig Huber, Julia Hellmer, and Friederike Schneider. 2nd ed. UVW, Univ.-Verlag Webler, 9–35.
  • Hughes, M. 2003. The Mythology of Research and Teaching Relationships in Higher Education. London: Society for Research into Higher Education Annual Conference: Research, Scholarship and Teaching: changing Relationships? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-mythology-of-research-and-teaching-in-Hughes/833cca029d77886818633babc8878e155a4a56b0.
  • Jańczak, Jarosław. 2022. “Political Science Research and Teaching in Central and Eastern Europe: Shifting Political Contexts and Academic Interests in the 1990–2020 Period.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (3):578–580. doi:10.1017/S1049096522000105.
  • Jenkins, Alan, Mick Healey, and Roger Zetter. 2007. Linking Teaching and Research in Disciplines and Departments. The Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/186_linkingteachingandresearch_april07_1568036803.pdf.
  • Johnson, David R., and James C. Creech. 1983. “Ordinal Measures in Multiple Indicator Models: A Simulation Study of Categorization Error.” American Sociological Review 43 (3):398–407. doi:10.2307/2095231.
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. 2018. Guidelines: Research-oriented Teaching Definition and Possibilities of implementation at KIT [Guidelines]. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. https://www.peba.kit.edu/downloads/Guidelines-Research-oriented%20teaching%20at%20KIT_2018.pdf.
  • Kiss, Allyson, Rachel Harari, and Rose Vukovic. 2019. “Reducing the Impact of Statistics Anxiety in College Classrooms.” The Accessible Toolbox. https://commons.mtholyoke.edu/theaccessibletoolbox/teaching-strategies-student-perspectives/math-anxiety/strategies/.
  • Kollars, Nina, and Amanda M. Rosen. 2017. “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Methods? Methodological Games and Role Play.” Journal of Political Science Education 13 (3):333–345. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1331137.
  • Krauz-Mozer, Barbara, Małgorzata Kułakowska, Piotr Ścigaj, and Paweł Borowiec. 2015. “Political Science at the Dawn of the 21st Century.” In Political Science in Europe at the Beginning of the 21st Century, eds. Barbara Krauz-Mozer, Małgorzata Kułakowska, Piotr Ścigaj, and Paweł Borowiec. Kraków, PL: Jagiellonian University Press, 9–18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/political-science-in-europe-at-the-beginning-of-the-21st-century/political-science-at-the-dawn-of-the-21st-century/BEDA3B7EC004351FEECA0F86B367DB5A
  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Adam Hoffman. 2001. “Teaching Undergraduate Methods: Overcoming “Stat” Anxiety.” The Political Methodologist 10 (1):7–9.
  • Lunde, Gerd H., Anne Bakke, and Kristina Areskoug-Josefsson. 2020. “Piloting a Research-oriented Teaching Model in a Bachelor Program for Social Educators – A Way to Increase Competence in Research Methodology and Sexual Health?” Uniped 43 (3):260–274. doi:10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2020-03-08.
  • Marfleet, B. Gregory, Brian J. Dille, and Brian J. Dille. 2005. “Information Literacy and the Undergraduate Research Methods Curriculum.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (2):175–190. doi:10.1080/15512160590961793.
  • Marleku, Alfred, Elisabeta Ollogu-Bajrami, and Ridvan Peshkopia. 2022. What Explain Political Science Students’ Preferences for Their Post-graduate Careers: Profession Perceptions and Academic Experiences. Shkodër, AL: New Perspectives on Global Education, Research and Innovation. October 28. https://www.npogeri.com/.
  • Marleku, Alfred, Ridvan Peshkopia, and D. Stephen Voss. 2022. “Research-oriented Studies in Political Science: How Research Collaboration Shapes Southeast European Student Learning Preferences. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Business, Technology and Innovation, Prishtinë, KO. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3740&context=conference
  • Mertens, Willem, Amedeo Pugliese, and Jan Recker. 2017. Nested data and multilevel models: Hierarchical linear modeling. In Quantitative Data Analysis: A Companion for Accounting and Information Systems Research, eds. Willem Mertens, Amedeo Pugliese, and Jan Recker. Berlin, DE: Springer International Publishing, 61–72. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42700-3_5.
  • Murphy, Chad. 2015. “The Use of Peer Modeling to Increase Self-efficacy in Research Methods Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1):78–93. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.985107.
  • Norman, Geoff. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 15 (5):625–632. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
  • Pan, Wei, and Mei Tang. 2005. “Students’ Perceptions on Factors of Statistics Anxiety and Instructional Strategies.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 32 (3):205–214.
  • Papanastasiou, Elena C., and Michalinos Zembylas. 2008. “Anxiety in Undergraduate Research Methods Courses: Its Nature and Implications.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 31 (2):155–167. doi:10.1080/17437270802124616.
  • Peshkopia, Ridvan. 2014a. “Between Social Tutelage and Individual Responsibility: Dilemmas of Higher Education in Eastern Europe.” Policy Futures in Education 12 (4):542–556. doi:10.2304/pfie.2014.12.4.542.
  • Peshkopia, Ridvan. 2014b. Ideology, ontological pluralism and freedom of science: The role of social sciences in establishing knowledge-based societies. 9th international conference DisCo 2014, Prague. September 17. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan-Beseda-2/publication/314159408_9th_international_confernce_DisCo_2014_New_media_literacy_education_from_pupils_to_lifelonglearning/links/58b820a392851c471d4a1bba/9th-international-confernce-DisCo-2014-New-media-literacy-education-from-pupils-to-lifelonglearning.pdf#page=271.
  • Peshkopia, Ridvan, Mërgim Cahani, Festim Cahani, and D. Stephen Voss. 2014. “SKUTHI: Developing a Tablet-based Survey Technology and Its Application in Teaching Research Methods in Social Sciences.” Applied Technologies & Innovations 10 (3):91–100. doi:10.15208/ati.2014.15.
  • Rom, Mark C. 2015. “Numbers, Pictures, and Politics: Teaching Research Methods through Data Visualizations.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (1):11–27. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.985108.
  • Slootmaeckers, Koen, Bart Kerremans, and Johan Adriaensen. 2014. “Too Afraid to Learn: Attitudes towards Statistics as a Barrier to Learning Statistics and to Acquiring Quantitative Skills.” Politics 34 (2):191–200. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12042.
  • Steele, Claude M., and Joshua Aronson. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5):797–811. doi:10.1037/.0022-3514.69.5.797
  • Sullivan, Gail, and Anthony R. Artino. 2013. “Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-type Scales.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5 (4):541–542. doi:10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
  • Zumbo, Bruno D., and Donald W. Zimmerman. 1993. “Is the Selection of Statistical Methods Governed by Level of Measurement?” Canadian Psychology 34 (4):390–400. doi:10.1037/h0078865.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.