The Game of Shapes: An Active Learning Template to Teach Constructivism in International Relations

References

• Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):319–363. doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ala, Jacqui, and Nathalie Hyde-Clarke. 2006. “The Utility of Adopting Problem-Based Learning in an International Relations Foundation Course.” Education as Change 10 (1):121–132. doi:10.1080/16823200609487133.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, Elia Elisa Cia, Ana Paula Maielo Silva, and Gabriela Gonçalves Barbosa. 2021. “A Framework for Active Learning in International Relations: The Case of the Challenge Game.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (1):123–138. doi:10.1080/15512169.2019.1612755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asal, Victor. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (3):359–373. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00213.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, Ken. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael. 2011. “Social Constructivism.” In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Behravesh, Maysam. 2011. Constructivism: an introduction. E-International Relations. Available at: https://www.eir.info/2011/02/03/constructivism-an-introduction/
   Google Scholar
• Chernoff, Fred. 2008. Theory and Metatheory in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, Gerard. 1997. Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, C. 2013. “Play and Politics.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (4):487–500. doi:10.1080/15512169.2013.835578.
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, Karin Marie. 2010. “Wittgenstein and International Relations Theory”. In C. Moore, & C. Farrands (Eds.), International relations theory and philosophy : Interpretive dialogues, pp. 83–94. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics: No. 80, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, Dee L. 2013. Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated - An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha, and, Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52(4):887–917. 10.1162/002081898550789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 2001. “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1):391–416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, J. P., and B. J. Millis. 2002. Using Simulation to Promote Learning in Higher Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, Johan. 2020. Homo Ludens. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva SA.
   Google Scholar
• Hynek, Nik, and Andrea Teti. 2010. “Saving Identity from Postmodernism? the Normalization of Constructivism in International Relations.” Contemporary Political Theory 9(2):171–199. 10.1057/cpt.2008.49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki, and Marcelo Valença. 2017. “Contribuições do Aprendizado Ativo ao Estudo das Relações Internacionais nas universidades brasileiras.”Meridiano 47-Journal of Global Studies 18 :1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Eric. 1998. Teaching With the Brain in Mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., and C. M. Shaw. 2010. Assessment of Active Learning. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Copenhagen: Robert A. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6(2):147–182. 10.1177/1354066100006002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel, John P., and Barbara J. Millis. 2002. Using Simulation to Promote Learning in Higher Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, Laura, and Ginger Jacobs. 2018. “From Active Learning to Taking Action: Incorporating Political Context into Project-Based, Interdisciplinary, International Service Learning Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (4):473–490. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1419876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, T. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (1):171–200. doi:10.1162/isec.23.1.171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, David A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, F. V. 1991. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (no. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieux, E. M. 1996. “Comparative Study of Learning in Lecture versus Problem-Based Learning.” About Teaching 50 :25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, Carlos, and João Martins Tude. 2015. Globalização e relações internacionais: casos de ensino. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
   Google Scholar
• Oleson, Amanda, and Matthew T. Hora. 2014. “Teaching the Way They Were Taught? Revisiting the Sources of Teaching Knowledge and the Role of Prior Experience in Shaping Faculty-Teaching Practices.” Higher Education 68 (1):29–45. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9678-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros, Andrew L. 2007. “Let’s Debate: Active Learning Encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking.” Journal of Political Science Education 3 (3):293–311. doi:10.1080/15512160701558273.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, Amandine. 2018. “Short Games Series as New Pedagogical Tools: The International Relations Games Show.” European Political Science 17 (3):494–518. doi:10.1057/s41304-017-0126-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, Cristina Carvalho. 2019. “Da construção à análise: integrando duas abordagens Para se trabalhar casos em Relações Internacionais.” Mural Internacional 10 :37948.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, C., and C. Butcher. 2017. “Using Dating as an Analogy to Teach ir Theory.” European Political Science 16 (1):99–112. doi:10.1057/eps.2015.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen, Hannes. 2017. A tale of cognition: The Evolution of Social Constructivism in International Relations. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 60(1) 1–18. doi:10.1590/0034-7329201700105.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, Thomas, and, Antje Wiener. 1999. “Something Rotten' and the Social Construction of Social Constructivism: A Comment on Comments.” Journal of European Public Policy 6(5):775–782. 10.1080/135017699343379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve. 1999. “Social Constructivisms and European Studies: A Reflectivist Critique.” Journal of European Public Policy 6(4):682–691. 10.1080/135017699343540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Elizabeth T., and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. “Designing in-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 29 (4):690–694. doi:10.2307/420794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, Maja. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar