Can Participation in Mock Elections Boost Civic Competence among Students?

References

• Abdelzadeh, A., and E. Lundberg. 2022. Ungas röst: En studie om ungdomars valdeltagande 2018 och deras egna tankar om att Delta i val. Stockholm: Myndigheten för ungdoms- och civilsamhällesfrågor.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 2015. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E. 2012. “How is Civic Engagement Developed over Time? Emerging Answers from a Multidisciplinary Field.” Journal of Adolescence 35 (3):611–627. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, M. K., and K. A. Weir. 2015. “Political Simulations: What we Know, What we Think we Know, and What we Still Need to Know.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (4):391–403. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1065748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranowski, M. 2006. “Single Session Simulations: The Effectiveness of Short Congressional Simulations in Introductory American Government Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):33–49. doi:10.1080/15512160500484135.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, C., J. Torney-Purta, B. Wilkenfeld, and J. Ross. 2015. “Immigrant and Native-Born Adolescents’ Civic Knowledge and Attitudes in Sweden and the United States: Emergent Citizenship within Developmental Niches.” Research in Comparative and International Education 10 (1):23–47. doi:10.1177/1745499914567818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. L. 2008. “Cultivating Civic Competence: Simulations and Skill-Building in an Introductory Government Class.” Journal of Political Science Education 4 (1):1–20. doi:10.1080/15512160701815996.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., and J. A. Eison. 1991. “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.” In ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Borge, J. A. Ø. 2017. “Tuning in to Formal Politics: Mock Elections at School and the Intention of Electoral Participation among First Time Voters in Norway.” Politics 37 (2):201–214. doi:10.1177/0263395716674730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, J. A. Ø. 2016. “Creating Democratic Citizens? An Analysis of Mock Elections as Political Education in School.” Doctoral diss. University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. (Eds.). 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P. 2013. “Active Learning Strategies for Diverse Learning Styles: Simulations Are Only One Method.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (4):818–822. doi:10.1017/S1049096513001145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, D. J., W. J. Miller, and D. Feuerstein. 2011. “Classroom as Reality: Demonstrating Campaign Effects through Live Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (1):14–33. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.539906.
   Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., and C. Bolzendahl. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.”Sex Roles 62 (5–6):318–333. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2017. The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, I., and J. Lo. 2022. “Cultivating Student Participation in the Context of Mock Elections in Schools: Practices and Constraints in Secondary Education in the Netherlands.” JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education 21(1):33–54.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, I., and B. Eidhof. 2019. “Mock Elections as a Way to Cultivate Democratic Development and a Democratic School Culture.” London Review of Education 17 (3):362–382. 33-54. doi:10.18546/LRE.17.3.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, I. 2018. “Political Simulations: An Opportunity for Meaningful Democratic Participation in Schools.” Democracy and Education 2 (26):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, I. 2017. “Mock Elections in Civic Education: A Space for Critical Democratic Citizenship Development.” JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education 16 (3):84–96.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, J. L., and K. Boeckelman. 2012. “Simulating 2008: A Mock Presidential Election’s Impact on Civic Engagement.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (4): 743–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, K., and M. A. Hansen. 2020. “The Variable Nature of the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 41 (2):127–143. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2020.1719000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaby, S. 2017. “The Civic Engagement Gap (s): Youth Participation and Inequality from 1976 to 2009.” Youth & Society 49 (7):923–946. doi:10.1177/0044118X16678155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. H., K. M. Hansen, and K. Levinsen. 2015. “Skolevalg 2015: En kvantitativ evaluering af elevernes oplevelse og udbytte af skolevalg.” In CVAP Working Paper Series Nr. 3. Copenhagen: Københavns Universite.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B., and J. G. Janmaat. 2019. Education, Democracy and Inequality: Political Engagement and Citizenship Education in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B. L., C. Barber, D. Van Nijlen, and E. Villalba. 2011. “Comparing Civic Competence among European Youth: Composite and Domain-Specific Indicators Using IEA Civic Education Study Data.” Comparative Education Review 55 (1):82–110. doi:10.1086/656620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. 2013. “Frequently Used Active Learning Techniques and Their Impact: A Critical Review of Existing Journal Literature in the United States.” European Political Science 12 (1):116–126. doi:10.1057/eps.2012.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2016. “Communicating Politics: Using Active Learning to Demonstrate the Value of the Discipline.” British Journal of Educational Studies 64 (3):315–335. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1133798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, D., and B. Hoskins. 2023. “The Evidence on Educational Methods for Political Engagement.” In Who’s Afraid of Political Education? The Challenge to Teach Civic Competence and Democratic Participation, eds. H. Tam, 147–162. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, E. G., K. Levinsen, and U. Kjaer. 2016. “Democracy for the Youth? The Impact of Mock Elections on Voting Age Attitudes.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (4):435–451. doi:10.1080/17457289.2016.1186031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lay, J. C., and K. J. Smarick. 2006. “Simulating a Senate Office: The Impact on Student Knowledge and Attitudes.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (2):131–146. doi:10.1080/15512160600668967.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, K., B. Blevins, and T. Riggers-Piehl. 2020. “Developing Civic Competence through Action Civics: A Longitudinal Look at the Data.” The Journal of Social Studies Research 44 (1):127–137. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2019.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Levintova, E., T. Johnson, D. Scheberle, and K. Vonck. 2011. “Global Citizens Are Made, Not Born: Multiclass Role-Playing Simulation of Global Decision Making.” Journal of Political Science Education 7 (3):245–274. doi:10.1080/15512169.2011.590075.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Banchik, L. 2018. “Assessing Knowledge Retention, with and without Simulations.” Journal of Political Science Education 14 (3):341–359. doi:10.1080/15512169.2017.1405355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinsen, K. 2021. “Demokratisk Dannelse Gennem Skolevalg.” Polis: Tidsskrift for Samfundsfagsdidaktik 3:153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, M., and B. J. Glenn. 2014. “Simulations Build Efficacy: Empirical Results from a Four-Week Congressional Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 10 (3):284–301. doi:10.1080/15512169.2014.921623.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., and S. E. Finkel. 2006. “Civic Education and the Development of Civic Knowledge and ’Attitudes.” In Developing Cultures: Essays on Cultural Change, eds. L. E. Harrison and J. Kagan, 77–94. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Öhrvall, R., and S. Oskarsson. 2020. “Practice Makes Voters? Effects of Student Mock Elections on Turnout.” Politics 40 (3):377–393. doi:10.1177/0263395719875110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskarson, M., and J. Ahlbom. 2021. “Trender i könsskillnader bland svenska väljare.” In Valforskningsprogrammets rapportserie, 2021, 1. Gothenburg, Sweden: Göteborgs universitet: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1992. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, C. S., J. A. Rosenthal, and J. Jones. 2001. “Preparing for Elite Political Participation Simulations and the Political Socialization of Adolescents.” Social Science Quarterly 82 (3):633–646. doi:10.1111/0038-4941.00047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandahl, J., M. Tväråna, and M. Jakobsson. 2022. “Samhällskunskap (Social Science Education) in Sweden: A Country Report.” Journal of Social Science Education 21 (3):85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., J. Fraillon, B. Losito, G. Agrusti, J. Ainley, V. Damiani, and T. Friedman. 2023. IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 Assessment Framework. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, S. M., and K. Turan. 2006. “Do Simulations Enhance Student Learning? An Empirical Evaluation of an IR Simulation.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1):19–32. doi:10.1080/15512160500484168.
   Google Scholar
• Shellman, S. 2001. “Active Learning in Comparative Politics: A Mock German Election and Coalition-Formation Simulation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (4):827–834. doi:10.1017/S1049096501000774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, R. 2015. “Assessing a Broad Teaching Approach: The Impact of Combining Active Learning Methods on Student Performance in Undergraduate Peace and Conflict Studies.” Journal of Political Science Education 11 (2):204–220. doi:10.1080/15512169.2015.1030502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, A. K., M. D. Stout, C. A. Flanagan, D. L. Mitra, M. B. Oliver, and S. S. Sundar. 2009. “Using Elections as Teachable Moments: A Randomized Evaluation of the Student Voices Civic Education Program.” American Journal of Education 116 (1):33–67. doi:10.1086/605100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, J., J. C. Cabrera, K. C. Roohr, O. L. Liu, and J. A. Rios. 2015. “Assessing Civic Competency and Engagement in Higher Education: Research Background, Frameworks, and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment.”ETS Research Report Series 2015 (2):1–48. doi:10.1002/ets2.12081.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., N. Burns, and K. L. Schlozman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59 (4):1051–1072. doi:10.2307/2998592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harward: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wunische, A. 2019. “Lecture versus Simulation: Testing the Long-Term Effects.” Journal of Political Science Education 15 (1):37–48. doi:10.1080/15512169.2018.1492416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar