270
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Mutual Anxiety in Supervision

References

  • Arkowitz, S. W. (2001). Perfectionism in the supervisory. In S. Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience (pp. 35–66). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,73, 5–46. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x
  • Berman, E. (2000). Psychoanalytic supervision: The intersubjective development. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis,81, 273–290. doi:10.1516/0020757001599762
  • Black, M. (2003). Enactment: analytic musings on energy, language, and personal growth. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,13, 633–655. doi:10.1080/10481881309348761
  • Brightman, B. K. (1984–1985). Narcissistic issues in the training experience of the psychotherapist. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy,10, 293–317.
  • Bromberg, P. M. (1982). The supervisory process and parallel process in psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,18, 92–111. doi:10.1080/00107530.1982.10745678
  • Buechler, S. (2008). Shaming psychoanalytic candidates. Psychoanalytic Inquiry,28, 361–372. doi:10.1080/07351690801962430
  • Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Epstein, L. (1986). Collusive selective inattention to the negative impact of the supervisory interaction. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,22, 389–409. doi:10.1080/00107530.1986.10746135
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G., & Sarnat, J. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychoanalytic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Gediman, H. K., & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: It’s reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanalytic Quarterly,49, 234–255.
  • Harris, A., & Gold, B. H. (2001). The fog rolled in: Induced dissociative states in clinical process. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,11, 357–384. doi:10.1080/10481881109348618
  • Hoffman, I. Z. (2001). Ritual and spontaneity in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Jacobs, D. (2001). Narcissism, eroticism, and envy in the supervisory relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49, 813–829.
  • Jacobs, D., David, P., & Meyer, D. (1995). The supervisory encounter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lane, R. (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Lesser, R. M. (1983). Supervision: Illusions, anxieties and questions. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,19, 120–129. doi:10.1080/00107530.1983.10746595
  • Levy, I. (2001). Supervision issues in supervision. In S. Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience (pp. 91–106). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • McKinney, M. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology,17, 565–584. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.17.3.565
  • Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Reifer, S. (2001). Dealing with anxiety of beginning therapists in supervision. In S. Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience (pp. 67–74). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Searles, H. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experiences. Psychiatry,18, 135–146.
  • Sherman, E. (2005). Notes from the margins: The gay analyst’s subjectivity in the treatment setting. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Sherman, E. (2013). Sweet dreams are made of this (or, how I came out and came to my own. In S. Kuchuck (Ed.), Clinical implications of the psychoanalyst’s life experience (pp. 112–121). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sherman, E. (2014). From dead to alive: Desire, dissociation and passion in the analytic dyad. Psychoanalytic Dialogues,24, 193–209. doi:10.1080/10481885.2014.893779
  • Slavin, J. H. (1998). Influence and vulnerability in psychoanalytic supervision and treatment. Psychoanalytic Psychology,15, 230–244. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.15.2.230
  • Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis,40, 197–237. doi:10.1080/00107530.2004.10745828
  • Strean, H. S. (1991). Colluding illusions among analytic candidates, their supervisors, and their patients: A major factor in some treatment impasses. Psychoanalytic Psychology,8, 403–414. doi:10.1037/h0079301
  • Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990). Super transference: The role of the supervisor’s blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology,7, 243–258. doi:10.1037/h0079155

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.