263
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

The Fluidity of Emotions and Clinical Vulnerability: A Field of Rhythmic Tensions

References

  • Alvarez, A. (1992). Live company. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Beebe, B., Knoblauch, S., Rustin, J., & Sorter, D. (2005). Forms of intersubjectivity in infant research and adult treatment. New York, NY: Other Press.
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanl Quarterly, 73, 5–46. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x
  • Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1893). On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenome non: A preliminary communication. Standard Edition, 2, 3–17.
  • Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays in clinical process, trauma & dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bruner, J. S., Oliver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Civitarese, G., & Ferro, A. (2013). The meaning and use of metaphor in analytic field theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 190–209. doi:10.1080/07351690.2013.779887
  • Clyman, R. B. (1991). The procedural organization of emotions: A contribution from cognitive science to the psychoanalytic theory of therapeutic action. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39S, 349–382.
  • Cornell, W. F. (2011). SAMBA, TANGO, PUNK: Commentary on Paper by Steven H. Knoblauch. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(4), 428–436.
  • Cornell, W. F. (2015). Somatic experience in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: In the expressive language of the living. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Dimen, M. (2011). With culture in mind; Psychoanalytic studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.
  • Freud, S. (1895). The psychotherapy of hysteria. Standard Edition, 2, 253–305.
  • Gerson, S. (2009). when the third is dead: Memory, mourning, and witnessing in the aftermath of the holocaust. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 1341–1357. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00214.x
  • Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, submission, surrender. Contemporary Psychoanal, 26, 108–136. doi:10.1080/00107530.1990.10746643
  • Grand, S. (2000). The reproduction of evil. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Harris, A., Kalb, M., & Klebanoff, S. (1917). Ghosts in the 21st century consulting room. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Heller, M., & Haynal, V. (1997). A doctor's face: Mirror of his patient's suicidal projects. In J. Guimón (Ed.), The body in psychotherapy (pp. 46–51). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1998). Ritual and spontaneity in the psychoanalytic process. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Jacobs, T. J. (1986). On countertransference enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34, 289–307.
  • Knoblauch, S. (2000). The musical edge of therapeutic dialogue. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Knoblauch, S. (2011). Contextualizing attunement within the polytrhythmic weave: The psychoanalytic samba. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(4), 414–427.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection. London, UK: Norton.
  • Loewald, H. W. (1965). Some considerations on repetition and repetition compulsion. In The essential Loewald: Collected papers and monographs (pp. 87–101). Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group.
  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 282–289. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199823)19:3<282::AID-IMHJ3>3.0.CO;2-O
  • Markman, H. (2011). Metaphors we live by: Commentary on paper by Steven H. Knoblauch. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21(4), 437–445.
  • Nebbiosi, G., & Federici-Nebbiosi, S. (2008). “We” got rhythm: Miming and polyphony of identity in psychoanalysis. In F. S. Anderson (Ed.), Bodies in treatment: The unspoken dimension (pp. 213–233). New York, NY: The Analytic Press.
  • Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Orange, D. (1995). Emotional understanding: Studies in psychoanalytic episte mology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Poland, W. (2000). The analyst’s witnessing and otherness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 17–34. doi:10.1177/00030651000480011301
  • Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertranference. New York, NY: IUP Press Inc.
  • Reis, B. (2009). Performative and enactive features of psychoanalytic witnessing: The transference as the scene of address. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 1359–1372. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00216.x
  • Shapiro, S. A. (1996). The embodied analyst in the Victorian consulting room. Gender and Psychoanalysis, 1, 297–322.
  • Shapiro, S. A. (2009). A rush to action: Embodiment, the analyst’s subjectivity, and the interpersonal experience. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 10, 93–103. doi:10.1080/15240650902768464
  • Sletvold, J. (2014). The embodied analyst: From Freud and Reich to relationality. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Stern, D. N. (1971). A microanlysis of mother-infant interactions. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 19, 501–517. doi:10.1016/S0002-7138(09)61752-0
  • Stern, D. N. (1994). One way to build a clinically relevant baby. Infant Mental Health Journal, 15, 9–25. doi:10.1002/1097-0355(199421)15:1<9::AID-IMHJ2280150103>3.0.CO;2-V
  • Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
  • Stern, D. N. (2010). Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Tronick, E., & Cohn, J. (1989). Infant–mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development, 60, 85–92. doi:10.2307/1131074

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.