References
- Aron, L., & Harris, A. (Eds.). (1993). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Borgogno, F. (2007). Ferenczi and Winnicott: Searching for A “Missing Link” (of the Soul). American Journal Psychoanal, 67(3), 221–234. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ajp.3350026
- Borossa, J. (2007). Therapeutic relations: Sandor Ferenczi and the British independents. In L. Caldwell (Ed.), Winnicott and the psychoanalytic tradition (pp. 141–164). London, UK: Karnac.
- Caldwell, L., & Joyce, A. (2011). Reading winnicott. London, UK: Routledge.
- Ferenczi, S. (1913). Stages in the development of the sense of reality. In First contributions to psychoanalysis (Vol. 1950, pp. 213–239). New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Gurevich, H. (2016). Orpha, orphic functions, and the orphic analyst: Winnicott’s “regression to dependence” in the language of Ferenczi. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 322–340. doi:10.1057/s11231-016-9049-2
- Kahr, B. (2016). Tea with Winnicott. London, UK: Karnac.
- Leikerman, M. (2001). Melanie Klein: Her work in context. London, UK: Continuum.
- The New School for Social Research. (n.d.). The Sándor Ferenczi Center at the New School for Social Research. Retrieved from http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/centers-special-programs/?id=104456
- Ogden, T. H. (2001). Reading Winnicott. Psychoanal Quarterly, 70(2), 299–323. doi:10.1002/j.2167-4086.2001.tb00602.x
- Ogden, T. H. (2016). Destruction reconceived: On Winnicott’s ‘the use of an object and relating through identifications’. International Journal Psycho-Anal, 97(5), 1243–1262. doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12554
- Tonnesmann, M. (2012). Early emotional development: Ferenczi to Winnicott. In J. Szekacs-Weisz & T. Keve (Eds.), Ferenczi for our time: Theory and practice (pp. 29–42). London, UK: Karnac.