The Need to Get In, Not Out, of Generative Enactments: A Relational Argument for Frequency

References

• Aron, L. (1990). One person and two person psychologies and the method of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 475–485. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.7.4.475
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analtyic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: Clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 87, 349–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L., & Starr, K. (2013). A psychotherapy for the people: Toward a progressive psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atlas, G. (2016). The enigma of desire: Sex, longing, and belongingi n psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atlas, G., & Aron, L. (2017). Dramatic dialogues: Contemporary clinical practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. & Atlas, G. (2019). Dramatic dialogue: Dreaming & drama in contemporary clinical practice. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 16(3), 249–271.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (2003). “E” enactments in psychoanalysis: Another medium, another message. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 657–675. doi:10.1080/10481881309348762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1998). Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2010). Where’s the gap and what’s the difference? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 46, 112–119. doi:10.1080/00107530.2010.10746042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1979). The transformational object. The International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 60, 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unknown thought. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1992). Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. (2012). The desire to do something. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 48, 533–543. doi:10.1080/00107530.2012.10746518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. H. (2000). Objects of hope: Exploring possibility and limit in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. M. (2018). The once and future focus of a relational psychoanalysis: Discussion of “Vitalizing Enactment”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(3), 355–360. doi:10.1080/10481885.2018.1459401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. (2009). Transformations in dreaming and characters in the psychoanalytic field. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 109–230. doi:10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00107.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghent, E. (1995). Interaction in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 479–491. doi:10.1080/10481889509539087
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 64, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1996). Psychoanalytic words and psychoanalytic acts—A brief history. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 195–213. doi:10.1080/00107530.1996.10746949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (2001). Thinking, talking, playing. The peculiar goals of psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 70, 131–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmark, R. (2012). The flow of enactive engagement. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 48, 287–300. doi:10.1080/00107530.2012.10746505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (2008). Coasting in the countertransference: Conflicts of self-interest between analyst and patient. New York, NY: Analytic press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer, S. B. (1996). Betwixt the dark and the daylight of maternal subjectivity: Meditations on the threshold. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 765–791. doi:10.1080/10481889609539152
   Google Scholar
• Levine, L. (2016). Mutual vulnerability: Intimacy, psychic collisions, and the shards of trauma. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 26(5), 571–579. doi:10.1080/10481885.2016.1214471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. P. (1085). How Kohut actually worked. Progress in Self Psychology, 1, 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1986). The wings of Icarus—Illusion and the problem of narcissism. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22, 107–132. doi:10.1080/00107530.1986.10746118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1992). Comments on transference an countertransference in the initial analytic meeting. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 12, 225–247. doi:10.1080/07351699209533894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62, 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1996). The analyst’s self-discovery. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 16, 390–400. doi:10.1080/07351699609534090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, S. (2015). Afraid to commit: Proposing psychoanalysis and the paradox of the analyst’s desire. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 51, 649–679. doi:10.1080/00107530.2015.1094966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2017). Relationships in development: Infancy, intersubjectivity, and attachment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, N. (2015). Rethinking the use of the couch: A relational perspective. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 51, 624–648. doi:10.1080/00107530.2016.1089428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, J. H. (2010). Becoming an individual: Technically subversive thoughts on the role of the analyst’s influence. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 308–324. doi:10.1080/10481885.2010.483957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (2006). Psychoanalytic collisions. New York, NY: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (2017). Going too far: Relational heroines and relational excess. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 27(3), 282–299. doi:10.1080/10481885.2017.1308205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, C. (1998). The analyst’s new clothes. The impact of the therapist’s unconscious conflicts on the treatment process. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34, 273–287. doi:10.1080/00107530.1998.10746362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40, 197–237. doi:10.1080/00107530.2004.10745828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2013). Relational freedom and therapeutic action. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61, 227–256. doi:10.1177/0003065113484060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (2017). Needed relationships and psychoanalytic healing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. (1990). Converting psychotherapy to psychoanalysis: A critique of the underlying assumptions. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 10, 119–130. doi:10.1080/07351699009533798
   Google Scholar
• Tublin, S. (2002). But always behind in the count: A response to “Sluggers and analysts”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 30, 69–74.
   Google Scholar