Mouth work: bodily action in sensory science

References

• Berenstein, N. 2018. “Designing Flavors for Mass Consumption.” The Senses & Society 13 (1): 19–40. doi:10.1080/17458927.2018.1426249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besky, S., and A. Blanchette. 2018. “Introduction: The Naturalization of Work.” Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1499-introduction-the-naturalization-of-work.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., C. Méadel, and V. Rabeharisoa. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31 (2): 194–217. doi:10.1080/03085140220123126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. 2009. “Food Oral Processing - A Review.” Food Hydrocolloids 23: 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civille, G. V., and A. S. Szczesniak. 1973. “Guidelines to Training a Texture Profile Panel.” Journal of Texture Studies 4 (2): 204–223. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00665.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., and C. Waldby. 2014. Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, S. 2015. “Becoming Jane: The Making and Unmaking of Hanford’s Nuclear Body.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (5): 796–812. doi:10.1177/0263775815599317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wijk, R. A., L. Engelen, and J. F. Prinz. 2003. “The Role of Intra-Oral Manipulation in the Perception of Sensory Attributes.” Appetite 40: 1–7. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(02)00172-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickau, J. 2017. “Inventing Texture: Edible Science and the Management of Familiarity, 1963-1975.” Global Food History 3 (2): 171–193. doi:10.1080/20549547.2017.1355720.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1966. Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Translated by James Strachey. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1995. Space, Time and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hankins, J. D. 2014. Working Skin: Making Leather, Making a Multicultural Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2015. “The Science of Sensory Evaluation: An Ethnographic Critique.” In Social Life of Materials: Studies in Materials and Society, edited by A. Drazin and S. Küchler, 81–97. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jetelma, M., J. Beckley, and J. Vahalik. 2015. “Model for Understanding Consumer Textural Food Choice.” Food Science & Nutrition 3 (3): 202–212. doi:10.1002/fsn3.205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1914. The Critique of Judgement. Translated by J. H. Bernard. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, C. 1999. Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahne, J. 2018. “Standard Sensations: The Production of Objective Experience from Industrial Technique.” The Senses & Society 13 (1): 6–18. doi:10.1080/17458927.2017.1420842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahne, J., and C. Spackman. n.d. “The Taste of Objectivity.” In Space, Taste and Affect: Atmospheres that Shape How We Eat, edited by E. Falconer. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, A. 2018. “Sensory Science Research on Taste. An Ethnography of Two Laboratory Experiments in Western Europe.” Food and Foodways 26 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1080/07409710.2017.1420352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, P. 2012. Semiotics of Drink and Drinking. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. 2013. “The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory.” Current Anthropology 54 (Supplement 7): S149–S158. doi:10.1086/670388.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Translated by Martin Nicolaus. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1965. The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1973. “Techniques of the Body.” Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88. doi:10.1080/03085147300000003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., T. H. Sanders, and G. V. Civille. 2002. “Descriptive Analysis of Commercially Available Creamy Style Peanut Butters.” Journal of Sensory Studies 17: 391–414. doi:10.1111/j.1745-459X.2002.tb00355.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., and J. Law. 2004. “Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: The Example of Hypoglycaemia.” Body & Society 10 (2–3): 43–62. doi:10.1177/1357034X04042932.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2012. “Dance Your PhD: Embodied Animations, Body Experiments, and the Affective Entanglements of Life Science Research.” Body & Society 18 (1): 151–189. doi:10.1177/1357034X11430965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarek, A., and Z. Vickers. 2017. “Effects of Swallowing and Spitting on Flavor Intensity.” Journal of Sensory Studies 32: e12277. doi:10.1111/joss.2017.32.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, A. 2018. Building Modern India: Transformations of Labor in the Indian Construction Industry. University of Chicago: PhD Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 2012. “The Sciences of Subjectivity.” Social Studies of Science 42 (2): 170–184. doi:10.1177/0306312711435375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 2016. “A Taste of Science: Making the Subjective Objective in the California Wine World.” Social Studies of Science 46 (3): 436–460. doi:10.1177/0306312716647508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar