Evolving antinomies of culinary practice: Britain 1968-2016

References

• Bauman, Z. 1988. Freedom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2003. “Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography.” American Sociological Review 68 (5): 645–679. doi:10.2307/1519757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaro, D. 2008. “A Taste of Otherness: Eating and Thinking Globally.” European Journal of English Studies 12 (2): 195–209. doi:10.1080/13825570802151470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, T., D. Marshall, M. Hogg, T. Schneider, and A. Petersen. 2016. “Consuming the Family and the Meal: Representations of the Family Meal in Women’s Magazines over 60 Years.” In The Practice of the Meal: Food, Families and the Market Place, edited by B. Cappellini, D. Marshall, and E. Parsons, 137–150. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D. 2020. Slowdown: The End of the Great Acceleration – And Why It’s Good for the Planet, the Economy and Our Lives. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favaro, L. 2020. “Hey, Here’s the New Way: Young Women’s Magazines in Times of the Web 3.0’.” In Womens Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1940s-2000s: The Contemporary Period, edited by L. Foster and J. Hollows, 96–113. Edinburgh: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. 1991. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, 65–82. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. 2004. Accounting for Taste: The Triumph of French Cuisine. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, C. 1980. “Food Habits, Social Change and the Nature/culture Dilemma.” Social Science Information 19: 937–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, L. 2020. “Introduction: Women’s Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1940s-2010s.” In Womens Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1940s-2000s: The Contemporary Period, edited by L. Foster and J. Hollows, 1–26. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frostling-Henningsson, M., M. Hedbom, and L. Wilandh. 2014. “Intentions to Buy “Organic” Not Manifested in Practice.” British Food Journal 116 (5): 872–887. doi:10.1108/BFJ-11-2010-0190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geysen, A. 2015. “The Ideology of Convenience: Canned Foods in Women’s Magazines (Flanders, 1945-60).” Appetite 94: 21–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyzen, A. 2015. “The Ideology of Convenience. Canned Foods in Women’s Magazines (Flanders, 1945–1960).” Appetite 94: 21–25. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofton, L., and M. Ness. 1991. “Twin Trends: Health and Convenience in Food Change, or Who Killed the Lazy Housewife?’.” British Food Journal 93 (7): 17–23. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000002352.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, M. K., and S. Jaworska. 2020. “Mapping Digital Foodscapes: Digital Food Influencers and the Grammars of Good Food’.” Geoforum 117: 183–193. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough-Yates, A. 2003. Understanding Women’s Magazines: Publishers, Markets and Readership. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gram, M., and B. S. Blichfeldt. 2014. “When Bad Food Happens to Good Intentions: Female Students’ Food Dilemmas.” Journal of Youth Studies 17 (8): 982–997. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.881986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, M., and E. Shove. 2004. “Orchestrating Concepts: Kitchen Dynamics and Regime Change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home, 1922–2002’.” Home Cultures 1 (3): 235–256. doi:10.2752/174063104778053464.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, J. 1995. Reading Women’s Magazines. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, T. 2007. “Mapping the Magazine: An Introduction.” Journalism Studies 8 (4): 510–521.
   Google Scholar
• Humble, N. 2005. Culinary Pleasures: Cookbooks and the Transformation of British Food. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, D., and D. Gimlin. 2009. The Globalization of Food: Key Issues. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. 2015. Anxious Appetites: Food and Consumer Culture. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. 2018. “Familial Fictions: Families and Food, Convenience and Care’.” European Journal of Marketing 52 (12): 2512–2519. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and S. Baumann. 2010. Foodies: Democracy and Distinction in the Gourmet Foodscape. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaernes, U., M. Harvey, and A. Warde. 2007. Trust in Food: An Institutional and Comparative Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. 1978. Prophesy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and post-industrial Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Leipämaa-Leskinen, H. 2007. “Contradictions in Food Consumption.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 31 (6): 597–602. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00614.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. 2015. Health, Food and Social Inequality: Critical Perspectives on the Supply and Marketing of Food. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. 2010. “Food 2030: Towards A Redefinition of Food? A Commentary on the New United Kingdom Government Food Strategy.” The Political Quarterly 81 (3): 443–446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02096.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, L., and S. Scott. 2005. “The Unbearable Lightness of Cleaning: Representations of Domestic Practice and Products in Good Housekeeping Magazine (UK).” Consumption, Markets & Culture 8 (4): 379–401. doi:10.1080/10253860500241948.
   Google Scholar
• Meah, A., and P. Jackson. 2017. “Convenience as Care: Culinary Antinomies in Practice.” Environment & Planning A 49 (9): 2065–2081. doi:10.1177/0308518X17717725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen Book Research. 2020. “The UK Food & Drink Book Market.” https://www.book2look.com/book/yLUqLnqdSb&clickedBy=wall&wallid=slccu2cqkj&referurl=www.nielsenisbnstore.com
   Google Scholar
• NRS. 2015. National Readership Survey (2014-5). London: Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, J. 2015. “‘good’ Food as Family Medicine: Problems of Dualist and Absolutist Approaches to “Healthy” Family Foodways.” Food Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2017. The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Invention of the New. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, S. 2012. Food Media: Celebrity Chefs and the Politics of Everyday Indifference. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Runciman, G. 2015. Very Different, but Much the Same: The Evolution of English Society since 1714. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, R. 2007. Consumer Culture: History, Theory and Politics. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T., and T. Davis. 2010. “Advertising Food in Australia: Between Antinomies and gastro-anomy.” Consumption Markets & Culture 13 (1): 31–41. doi:10.1080/10253860903346740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toynbee, P., and A. Walker. 2020. The Lost Decade: 2010-2020, and What Lies Ahead for Britain. London: Guardian Faber Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, P. 2020. Scoff: A History of Food and Class in Britain. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A. 1997. Consumption, Food and Taste: Culinary Antinomies and Commodity Culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A., J. Paddock, and J. Whillans. 2020. The Social Significance of Dining Out: A Study of Continuity and Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, A., J. Whillans, and J. Paddock. 2019. “The Allure of Variety: Eating Out in Three English Cities, 2015.” Poetics 72: 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D., and A. Warde. 2017. “How Should We Understand ‘General Understandings.’” In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki, and E. Shove, 183–196. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, E. 2018. Taken for Granted: The Remarkable Power of the Unremarkable. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar