More-than-human assemblages and the politics of (Food) conviviality: cooking, eating, and living together in Germany

References

• Abarca, M. 2020. “Foreword. In Food Identities at Home and on the Move.” In Explorations at the Intersection of Food, Belonging and Dwelling, edited by R. Matta, C.-É. Suremain, and C. Crenn, xii–xviii. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abbots, E.-J. 2016. “Introducing a Special Issue on Food Stuffs: Materialities, Meanings, and Embodied Encounters.” Gastronomica 13 (3): 1–4. doi:10.1525/gfc.2016.16.3.1.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson, S., F. Bertoni, A. Mol, and R. I. Martín. 2015. “Living with Omega-3: New Materialism and Enduring Concerns.” Environment and Planning D 33 (1): 4–19. doi:10.1068/d14086p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adloff, F. 2020. “Experimental Conviviality: Exploring Convivial and Sustainable Practices.” Open Cultural Studies 1 (1): 112–121. doi:10.1515/culture-2020-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baban, F., and K. Rygiel. 2017. “Living with Others: Fostering Radical Cosmopolitanism through Citizenship Politics in Berlin.” Ethics & Global Politics 10 (1): 98–116. doi:10.1080/16544951.2017.1391650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28 (3): 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredewold, F., A. Haarsma, E. Tonkens, and M. Jager. 2020. “Convivial Encounters: Conditions for the Urban Social Inclusion of People with Intellectual and Psychiatric Disabilities.” Urban Studies 57 (10): 2047–2063. doi:10.1177/0042098019869838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillé, A. 2000. Anthropologie du Don. Paris: Desclée de Bouwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, J. 2016. “Documenting Subjects: Performativity and Audit Culture in Food Production in Northern Italy.” American Ethnologist 43 (4): 691–703. doi:10.1111/amet.12384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P., and M. Romero Mikkelsen. 2013. “‘There Is Nothing Here for Us.!’ How Girls Create Meaningful Places of Their Own through Movement.” Children & Society 27 (3): 197–207. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J. 2010. Cosmologies of Credit. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. 2013. “Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences.” Millennium 41 (3): 451–469. doi:10.1177/0305829813481006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R. 2004. Foodscapes: Towards a Deleuzian Ethics of Consumption. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Espírito Santo, D., and J. Hunter. 2021. “Introduction. On the Materiality of Unseen Things.” In Mattering the Invisible. Technologies, Bodies, and the Realm of the Spectral, edited by D. E. Santo and J. Hunter, 1–21. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., and B. Azad. 2013. “The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective.” In Materiality and Organizing. Social Interaction in a Technological World, edited by P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, and J. Kallinikos, 237–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, C. 2011. “Commensality, Society and Culture.” Social Science Information 50 (3–4): 528–548. doi:10.1177/0539018411413963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food Relations. 2018. Food as A Key Medium for Social Inclusion and Intercultural Dialogue: A Taste of Lessons Learned from European Initiatives. Freiburg: AGRONAUTEN.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. 2005. “Biketivism and Technology: Historical Reflections and Appropriations.” Social Epistemology 19 (4): 401–417. doi:10.1080/02691720500145696.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Reading, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Given, M. 2013. “Commotion, Collaboration, Conviviality: Mediterranean Survey and the Interpretation of Landscape.” Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 26 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1558/jmea.v26i1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Given, M. 2018. “Conviviality and the Life of Soil.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 28 (1): 127–143. doi:10.1017/S0959774317000609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glissant, É. 1997. Poetics of Relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, M. 2016. “Food Geographies I: Relational Foodscapes and the busy-ness of Being more-than-food.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (2): 257–266. doi:10.1177/0309132515570192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grignon, C. 2001. “Commensality and Social Morphology: An Essay of Typology.” In Food, Drink and Identity: Cooking, Eating and Drinking in Europe since the Middle Ages, edited by P. Scholliers, 23–33. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E. 2015. “Archipelago Europe: On Creolizing Conviviality.” In Creolizing Europe. Legacies and Transformations, edited by E. G. Rodríguez and S. A. Tate, 80–99. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2020. “Art and Anthropology for a Sustainable World.” In Modos de Fazer/Ways of Doing, edited by O. Jorge, 603–622. Vol. V. Porto: CITCEM.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., and M. Goodman. 2015. “Spectacular Foodscapes.” Food, Culture and Society 18 (2): 205–222. doi:10.2752/175174415X14180391604369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, H., M. Michaud, and N. Nicklas Neuman. 2021. “What Is Commensality? A Critical Discussion of an Expanding Research Field.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (12): 6235. doi:10.3390/ijerph18126235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, A. 2015. “Agency between Humanism and Posthumanism: Latour and His Opponents.” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 43–58. doi:10.14318/hau5.2.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E., and S. Helmreich. 2010. “The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 545–576. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koca, B. T. 2019. “Local Bordering Practices, Refugees, and Civil Society: The Case of Berlin.” Geographical Review 109 (4): 544–561. doi:10.1111/gere.12351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and A. Mol. 1995. “Notes on Materiality and Sociality.” The Sociological Review 43 (2): 274–294. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. 2016. The Box. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzi, M. 2020. “More-Than-Human Conviviality-Inequality in Latin America.” Mecila Working Paper Series 29.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. 2016. “Liberated Technology: Inside Emancipatory Communication Activism.” In Civic Media. Technology, Design, Practice, edited by E. Gordon and P. Mihailidis, 107–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. “Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space.” Geography Compass 9 (1): 27–41. doi:10.1111/gec3.12192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicka, M., and S. Vertovec. 2014. “Comparing Convivialities: Dreams and Realities of living-with-difference.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (4): 341–356. doi:10.1177/1367549413510414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyers, P., and K. Rygiel. 2012. “Introduction.” In Citizenship, Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement, edited by P. Nyers and K. Rygiel, 1–19. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rérat, P. 2021. “The Rise of the e-bike: Towards an Extension of the Practice of Cycling?” Mobilities 16 (3): 423–439. doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1897236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. 2020. “Swapping Schnitzel for Shawarma: How Germany’s Tastebuds are Evolving Thanks to Migration.” INFOMIGRANTS. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/26652/swapping-schnitzel-for-shawarma-how-germany-s-tastebuds-are-evolving-thanks-to-migration
   Google Scholar
• Sobal, J. 2000. “Sociability and Meals: Facilitation, Commensality and Interaction.” In Dimensions of the Meal, edited by H. L. Meiselman, 119–133. Gaithersburg: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J., R. Aldred, and K. Brown. 2015. “Geographies of Citizenship and Everyday (Im)mobility.” Geoforum 64: 325–332. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surinder, P., W. Wills, and A. Angela Dickinson. 2015. “Is It a Pleasure to Eat Together? Theoretical Reflections on Conviviality and the Mediterranean Diet.” Sociology Compass 9 (11): 977–986. doi:10.1111/soc4.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2009. “Mobilities and Social Theory.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by B. Turner, 477–495. Sussex: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2018. “The Matrix of Convivial Technology – Assessing Technologies for Degrowth.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (2): 1778–1786. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S., and S. Hinchliffe. 2010. “Ecological Landscapes.” In Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by D. Hicks and M. Beaudry, 439–454. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. 2011. “Moving Food: Gustatory Commensality and Disjuncture in Everyday Multiculturalism.” New Formations 74 (1): 82–107. doi:10.3898/NewF.74.05.2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., and G. Noble. 2016. “Convivialities: An Orientation.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 423–431. doi:10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar