Civil Servant Involvement in the Strategic Communication of Central Government Organizations: Mediatization and Functional Politicization

References

• Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., Binderkrantz, A. S., & Hansen, K. M. (2012). Forskningsdesign. In L. B. Andersen, K. M. Hansen, & R. Klemmesen (Eds.), Metoder i Statskundskab. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminister systems: Impartial public administration and mangement performance at risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., Sinclair, A., & Lee, H. (2015). Media attention and the demise of agency independence: Evidence from a mass administrative reorganization in Britain. Public Administration, 93(4), 1168–1183. doi:10.1111/padm.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo-Smith Commission (2015). Embedsmanden i det moderne folkestyre. Bo Smith-udvalgets rapport om samspillet mellem politikere og embedsmænd. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Canel, M. J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Introduction: Mapping the field of government communication. In K. Sanders, & M. J. Canel (Eds.), Government communication: Cases and challenges (pp. 1–28). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, D., & Monk, W. (2001). Quangos and the communications dependent society. European Journal of Communication, 16(1), 25–49. doi:10.1177/0267323101016001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. The Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696–727. doi:10.2307/3069614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2003). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In G. B. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 116–127). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (Eds.). (2010). Partisan appointees and public servants: An international analysis of the role of the political adviser. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (Eds.). (2014a). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014b). Conclusion. In F. Esser, & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 223–242). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2015). Organizations, stakeholders, and intermediaries: Towards a general theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(4), 253–271. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2015.1064125
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., & Pallas, J. (2014). Media enactments: Where to look for inspiration in mediatization studies. In J. Pallas, L. Strannegård, & S. Johnsson (Eds.), Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world (pp. 234–248). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., Schillemans, T., & Pallas, J. (2015). Determinants of organizational mediatization: An analysis of the adaption of Swedish government agencies to news media. Public Administration, 93(4), 149–167. doi:10.1111/padm.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnett, J. L. (1997). Administrative communication: Domains, threats, and legitimacy. In J. L. Garnett, & A. Kouzmin (Eds.), Handbook of administrative communication (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A.; with assistance from Smith, J. (2005). Political communication faces the 21st century. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 479–507. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøn, C. H., & Salomonsen, H. (forthcoming). Survey of Danish civil servants and politicians, 2014. Methodology. Working paper. Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Political Science Copenhagen University.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D. R., van Ruler, B., Vercic, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2006). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (2013). Strategic Communication: Pillars and perspectives on an alaternative paradigm. In K. Sriramesh, A. Zerfass, & J. N. Kim (Eds.), Current trends and emergent topic in public relations and communication management (pp. 283–302). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2014). Ensuring political responsiveness: Politicisation mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies. International Review of Administrative Science, 80(4), 746–765. doi:10.1177/002085231453344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., & Schillemans, T. (2016). Media and public accountability: Typology and exploration. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 23–40. doi:10.1332/030557315X14431855320366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.997906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R., & Derlien, H.-U. (1989). Party patronage and politicisation of the West German administrative elite, 1970–1987: Toward hybridization? Governance, 2(4), 384–404. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.1989.tb00099.x
   Google Scholar
• McNair, B. (2003). An introduction to political communication (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. (1998). Betænkning nr. 1354. Forholdet mellem minister og embedsmænd. Copenhagen, Denmark: Schultz.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. (2013). Ministrenes særlige rådgivere. Et serviceeftersyn. Betænkning 1537. Copenhagen, Denmark: Schultz.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2007). Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice. Public Administration, 85(3), 569–586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2008). How much responsiveness is too much or too little? The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(3), 345–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallas, J., Fredriksson, M., & Wedlin, L. (forthcoming). Translating media: When ideas meet profession. Organization Studies, accepted.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, J., Johnsson, S., & Strannegård, L. (2014). Media and organizations: Images, practices and organizing. In J. Pallas, L. Strannegård, & S. Johnsson (Eds.), Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world (pp. 1–10). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (2016). Governance and the media: Exploring the linkages. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 9–22. doi:10.1332/030557315X14446617187930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2004a). Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: A quest for control. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (2004b). Politicization of the civil service: Concepts, causes, consequences. In G. B. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: A quest for control (pp. 1–13). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2004). Politicisation of the Swedish civil service: A necessary evil – or just evil? In G. B. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: A quest for control (pp. 1–13). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., & Canel, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Government communication: Cases and challenges. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., Canel, M. J., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2011). Communicating governments: A three country comparison of how governments communicate with citizens. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 523–547. doi:10.1177/1940161211418225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. (2012). Mediatization of public services: How organizations adapt to new media. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. (2016). Fighting or fumbling with the beast? The mediatisation of public sector agencies in Australia and the Netherlands. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 79–96. doi:10.1332/030557315X14466438893302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., & Jacobs, S. (2014). Between a rock and a hard place: Framing public organization in the news. In J. Pallas, L. Strannegård, & S. Johnsson (Eds.), Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world (pp. 147–161). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., & Pierre, J. (2016). Entangling and disentangling governance and the media. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 1–8. doi:10.1332/147084415x14503518462782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. doi:10.1177/1940161208319097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping politics: Mediatization and media interventionism. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences (pp. 205–223). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Towards a theoretical framework. In F. Esser, & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 3–30). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, L. O. (1961). Administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. G. (2013). Communications and prime ministerial power. In J. Bickerton, & G. B. Peters (Eds.), Governing: Essays in honour of Donald J. Savoie (pp. 53–84). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, D. K. (2014). Alle embedsmænd skal tale om fejl. Djøfbladet, 25(March), 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2015a). Mediatization of public bureaucracies: Administrative versus political loyalty. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(2), 179–197. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2015b). Byråkrati, medier og kommunikasjon. In Ø. Ihlen, E. Skogerbø, & S. Allern (Eds.), Makt, medier og politik. Norsk politisk kommunikation (pp. 147–158). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsrud, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlen, Ø. (2014). Mediatization in public bureaucracies: A typology. The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(1), 3–22. doi:10.1515/commun-2014-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsrud, K., Ihlen, Ø., & Figenschou, T. U. (2014). Mediatization in news areas: The changed role of public bureaucracies. In J. Pallas, L. Strannegård, & S. Johnsson (Eds.), Organizations and the media: Organizing in a mediatized world (pp. 162–175). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (Ed.). (2007). Government communication in Australia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar