Organizing and Disorganizing Strategic Communication: Discursive Institutional Change Dynamics in Two Communication Departments

References

• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149. doi:10.1177/0018726700539002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chreim, S. (2006). Managerial frames and institutional discourses of change: Employee appropriation and resistance. Organization Studies, 27(9), 1261–1287. doi:10.1177/0170840606064106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2002). New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Missed opportunity for institutionalizing communication practice? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 93–101. doi:10.1080/15531180902805445
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska, & G. Sevón ( Ed.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–47). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruytier.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change (Vol. 56). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Doolin, B., Grant, D., & Thomas, R. (2013). Translating translation and change: Discourse-based approaches. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 251–265. doi:10.1080/14697017.2013.822670
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, D. M. (1992). The organizational roles of communications and public relations practitioners. In J. E. Grunig ( Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 327–355). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, D. M., & Broom, G. M. (2006). The centrality of practitioner roles to public relations theory. In C. H. Botan, & V. Hazelton ( Eds.), Public relations theory II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2012). Branding in governance and public management. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. doi:10.1177/0957926592003002004
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26. doi:10.1111/comt.2004.14.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2014). Organizational discourse analysis. In L. L. Putnam, & D. K. Mumby ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 271–295). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2013). Public relations and the new institutionalism: In search of a theoretical framework. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 205–221. doi:10.1177/2046147X13485353
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, M., Pallas, J., & Wehmeier, S. (2013). Public relations and neo-institutional theory. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 183–203. doi:10.1177/2046147X13485956
   Google Scholar
• Grandien, C., & Johansson, C. (2012). Institutionalization of communication management: A theoretical framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(2), 209–227. doi:10.1108/13563281211220247
   Google Scholar
• Grant, D., & Marshak, R. J. (2011). Toward a discourse-centered understanding of organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 204–235. doi:10.1177/0021886310397612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D., Michelson, G., Oswick, C., & Wailes, N. (2005). Guest editorial: Discourse and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(1), 6–15. doi:10.1108/09534810510579814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_5
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 25–47. doi:10.1080/00208825.2001.11656819
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmer-Nadesan, M. (1996). Organizational identity and space of action. Organization Studies, 17(1), 49–81. doi:10.1177/017084069601700103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, E., & Romenti, S. (2009). Institutionalization and evaluation of corporate communication in Italian companies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 116–130. doi:10.1080/15531180902810197
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., & Heide, M. (2008). Kommunikation i förändringsprocesser. Malmö, Sweden: Liber AB.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., & Ottestig, A. T. (2011). Communication executives in a changing world: Legitimacy beyond organizational borders. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 144–164. doi:10.1108/13632541111126364
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski ( Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. S., & Pepper, G. L. (2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: A case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 528–557. doi:10.1177/0893318903251626
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, L. (2005). Upplysning och propaganda: Utvecklingen av svensk PR och information. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, L. (2006). Public relations and democracy: A Swedish perspective. In J. L’Etang ( Ed.), Public relations: Critical debates and contemporary practice (pp. 123–141). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033. doi:10.1177/0170840613495305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. doi:10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., & Jiang, H. (2014). Effective public relations leadership in organizational change: A study of multinationals in Mainland China. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(2), 134–160. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2013.864241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, Á., Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., & Zerfass, A. (2010). European communication monitor 2009. An institutionalized view of how public relations and communication management professionals face the economic and media crises in Europe. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby ( Eds), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 602–720). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440. doi:10.1177/0018726713495704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, B. H., & Berger, B. K. (2006). Finding influence: Examining the role of influence in public relations practice. Journal of Communication Management, 10(3), 235–249. doi:10.1108/13632540610681130
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields and identities. In B. Czarniawska, & G. Sevón ( Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–91). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruytier.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhu, S. (2009). Strategic communication: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 72–92. doi:10.1080/15531180902805429
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. B., Schneider, B., & Dickson, M. W. (2006). Meso organizational behavior: Comments on the third paradigm. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 149–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swerling, J., & Sen, C. (2009). The institutionalization of the strategic communication function in the United States. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 131–146. doi:10.1080/15531180902816566
   Google Scholar
• Tench, R., Verhoeven, P., & Zerfass, A. (2009). Institutionalizing strategic communication in Europe—An ideal home or a mad house? Evidence from a survey in 37 countries. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 147–164. doi:10.1080/15531180902806237
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2001). Discourse analysis in communication. In D. Schriffin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton ( Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 725–749). Cornwall: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Hargrave, T. J. (2004). Social, technical, and institutional change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. doi:10.2307/258786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercic, D., van Ruler, B., Butschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2001). On the definition of public relations: A European view. Public Relations Review, 27(4), 373–387. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00095-9
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P., Zerfass, A., & Tench, R. (2011). Strategic orientation of communication professionals in Europe. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5(2), 95–117. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2011.561080
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, K. P., & Holtzhausen, D. (2009). An analysis of the influence of public relations department leadership style on public relations strategy use and effectiveness. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(4), 404–427. doi:10.1080/10627260902966391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A. (2009). Institutionalizing strategic communication: Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 69–71. doi:10.1080/15531180902810205
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., & Franke, N. (2013). Enabling, advising, supporting, executing: A theoretical framework for internal communication consulting within organizations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(2), 118–135. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2013.765438
   Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby ( Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151–169). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar