How Do Media Companies Gain Legitimacy? An Experimental Study on the (Ir)Relevance of CSR Communication

References

• Altman, D. G., & Bland, M. (1995). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7003), 485. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmeppen, K.-D. (2011). Journalistische Berichterstattung und Media Social Responsibility: Über die doppelte Verantwortung von Medienunternehmen. In J. Raupp, S. Jarolimek, & F. Schultz (Eds.), Handbuch CSR. Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen, disziplinäre Zugänge und methodische Herausforderungen. Mit Glossar (pp. 247–266). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, P., & Ingenhoff, D. (2016). Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review, 42, 386–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardoel, J., & d’Haenens, L. (2004). Media responsibility and accountability: New conceptualizations and practices. Communications, 29, 5–25. doi:10.1515/comm.2004.007
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. L. (2011). Public relations and corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 67–86). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bögel, P. M. (2015). Processing of CSR communication: Insights from the ELM. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 128–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brønn, P. S. (2011). Marketing and corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 110–127). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through Internet and Social Media. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 358–378). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1991, July–August). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility. Concepts and practices. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 19–46). Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9567-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393. doi:10.1177/1350508413478310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Missed opportunity for institutionalizing communication practice? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3, 93–101. doi:10.1080/15531180902805445
   Google Scholar
• Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2008). The corporate social responsibility Agenda. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 3–15). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. doi:10.2307/1388226
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Elvestad, E., & Blekesane, A. (2008). Newspaper readers in Europe: A multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication, 23, 425–447. doi:10.1177/0267323108096993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elving, W. J. L., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A., & Thomson, C. (2015). The bad, the ugly and the good: New challenges for CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 118–127. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-02-2015-0006
   Google Scholar
• Falk, A., & Heckmann, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326, 535–538. doi:10.1126/science.1168244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkheimer, J. (2014). The power of strategic communication in organizational development. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 6(2/3), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2016). A reflexive perspective on public relations. On leaving traditional thinking and uncovering the taken-for-granted. In J. L’Etang, D. McKie, N. Snow & J. Xifra (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations (pp. 162–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). the persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasive attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthey, E., Langer, R., & Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility is a management fashion. So what? In M. Morsing, & S. C. Beckmann (Eds.), Strategic CSR communication (pp. 39–60). Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C.-D., Nelson, M. R., & Das, S. (2015). How to measure persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 17–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, P. Y. (2002). Zur psychometrischen Optimierung einer Reaktanzskala mittels klassischer und IRT-basierter Analysemethoden. Diagnostica, 48(4), 163–171. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.48.4.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay, S., & Coombs, W. T. (2013). Public relations literacy: Developing critical consumers of public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 125–146. doi:10.1177/2046147X13483673
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., & Reber, B. H. (2011). Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review, 37, 166–168. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 252–266. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27752775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, A. M. (2012). Media governance and corporate social responsibility of media organizations: An international comparison. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(2), 154–167. doi:10.1111/beer.2012.21.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingenhoff, D., & Sommer, K. (2010). Trust in companies and in CEOs: A comparative study of the main influences. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 339–355. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0363-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandura, O., & Brosius, H.-B. (2011). Wer liest sie (noch)? Das Publikum der Qualitätszeitungen. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Eds.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (pp. 195–206). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, J., & Quinn, S. (2010). Funding journalism in the digital age: Business models, strategies, issues and trends. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2011). Wiederholung und Wahrheit. Wie die mehrmalige Präsentation politischer Slogans die Einschätzung ihrer Glaubwürdigkeit beeinflusst. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(4), 487–504. doi:10.5771/1615-634X-2011-4
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2013a). Das Wiederholungsparadoxon. Warum die Wiederholung einer Aussage ihre Glaubwürdigkeit zugleich erhöht und senkt. Publizistik, 58, 5–21. doi:10.1007/s11616-012-0164-7
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Zerback, T. (2013b). Helpful or harmful. How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63(6), 993–1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohring, M. (2004). Vertrauen in Journalismus. Theorie und Empirie. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. A., & Nielson, R. K. (Eds.). (2010). The changing business of journalism and its implications for democracy. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Marrewijk, M. v (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105. doi:10.1023/A:1023331212247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). I approve this message: Effects of sponsorship, ad tone, and reactance in 2008 presidential advertising. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 666–689. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.530381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338. doi:10.1111/beer.2006.15.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97–111. doi:10.1080/13527260701856608
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Jain, P., & Chung, A. H. (2010). Reinforcement or reactance? Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative. Journal of Communication, 62, 1010–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01680.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52, 235–247. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003, August). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, Thirtheen: Three, 13, 251–274. doi:10.1111/comt.2003.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2014). The causal foundations of structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 68–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pincoffs, E. L. (1988). The practices of responsibility-ascription. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 61(5), 823–839. doi:10.2307/3130290
   Google Scholar
• Podnar, K., & Golob, U. (2007). CSR expectations: The focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(4), 326–340. doi:10.1108/13563280710832498
   Google Scholar
• Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9729-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image. Inhibiting scepticism to enhance persuasion. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(4), 420–439. doi:10.1108/13563280910998763
   Google Scholar
• Pomering, A., Johnson, L. W., & Noble, G. (2013). Advertising corporate social responsibility. Results from an experimental manipulation of key message variables. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 249–263. doi:10.1108/13563281311319517
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard, & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion. Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 167–183). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rössler, P. (2011). Skalenhandbuch Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Russ-Mohl, S. (2011). Newspaper death watch. Der amerikanische Journalismus als existenzgefährdetes Ökosystem. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Eds.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (pp. 81–95). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist Group. (2015). Guiding principles. Retrieved from http://www.economistgroup.com/results_and_governance/governance/guiding_principles.html
   Google Scholar
• Tolvanen, K., Olkkonen, L., & Luoma-aho, V. (2013). The legitimacy of the media industry – What do advertisers expect? Journal of Media Business Studies, 10(2), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trommershausen, A. (2011). Corporate Responsibility in Medienunternehmen. Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345. doi:10.1207/pspr.1997.1.issue-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergne, J.-P. (2011). Toward a new measure of organizational legitimacy: Method, validation, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 484–502. doi:10.1177/1094428109359811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werder, K. P. (2015). A theoretical framework for strategic communication messaging. In D. Holtzhausen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 269–284). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1984). Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49(4), 512–525. doi:10.2307/2095465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar