Towards Comparative Research in Strategic Communication: A Systematic Analysis of Cross-National Studies and Future Directions

References

• An, S.-K., Park, D.-J., Cho, S., & Berger, B. (2010). A cross-cultural study of effective organizational crisis response strategy in the United States and South Korea. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4(4), 225–243. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2010.515543
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, N., & Weaver, C. K. (2011). Introduction. In N. Bardhan & C. K. Weaver (Eds.), Public relations in global cultural contexts. Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, B., & Meng, J. (Eds.). (2014). Public relations leaders as sensemakers: A global study of leadership in public relations and communication management. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G. (2012). Foreword. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. xi–xiii). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1975). Towards a comparative framework for political communication research. In S. H. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication: Issues and strategies for research (pp. 165–193). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., McLeod, J. M., & Rosengren, K. E. (1992). An introduction to comparative communication research. In J. G. Blumler, J. M. McLeod, & K. E. Rosengren (Eds.), Comparatively speaking: Communication and culture across space and time (pp. 3–18). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 645–661. doi:10.1111/jcom.2004.54.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner, R., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In D. Rousseau (Ed.), Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 112–129). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Meng, J., Boyd, B., & Reber, B. H. (2016). Political ideology, media-source preferences, and messaging strategies: A global perspective on trust building. Public Relations Review (In Press), 42, 616–626. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. M. (2017). Research Network and Comparative Communication Studies: Practice and Reflections. In J. M. Chan & F. L. Lee (Eds.), Advancing Comparative Media and Communication Research (pp. 241–256). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. M., & Lee, F. L. (2017). Introduction. In J. M. Chan & F. L. Lee (Eds.), Advancing Comparative Media and Communication Research (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. K., Anthony, P. A., Fung, Y. H., Kedl, K. D., Luther, C. A., & Szuba, J. (2001). Comparing nations in mass communication research, 1970-97: A critical assessment of how we know what we know. Gazette, 63(5), 415–434. doi:10.1177/0016549201063005004
   Google Scholar
• Chung, W., & Choi, J. (2012). Professionalism in public relations pedagogy: A comparative analysis of public relations curricula among the United States, the United Kingdom, and South Korea. Journalism and Massachusetts Communication Educator, 67(4), 375–391. doi:10.1177/1077695812462348
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, T. W., & Holladay, S. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279–295. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, T. W., Holladay, S., Hasenauer, G., & Signitzer, B. (1994). A comparative analysis of international public relations: Identification and interpretation of similarities and differences between professionalization in Austria, Norway, and the United States. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(1), 23–39. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0601_02
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, H., & Hepp, A. (2012). Comparing media cultures. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 249–261). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, H. M. (1996). Introduction. In H. M. Culbertson & N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, A. (1982). Comparative communication research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F. (2013). Comparative communication enquiry: Advancing cross-national research in times of globalization. International Journal of Communication, 7, 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012a). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 3–22). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012b). Challenges and perspectives of comparative communication inquiry. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 501–516). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Meeting the challenges of global communication and political integration: The significance of comparative research in a changing world. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 384–410). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Comparative research methods in mass communications: An overview (2nd revised version) (Working Paper No. 86). Zurich, CH: National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR). Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. A. (1984). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as public relations paradigm. Paper presented to the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL. 1984, August.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2004). The method of structured, focused comparison. In A. L. George & A. Bennett (Eds.), Case studies and theory development in the social sciences (pp. 67–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of comparative political communication research: Poised for maturity? In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 325–343). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture. Towards a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–385. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T. (2009). Comparative journalism studies. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 413–427). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., & Altmeppen, K. D. (2007). Über das Vergleichen: Komparative Forschung in deutschen kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschriften, 1948–2005. Medien and Kommunikationswissenschaft, 55(2), 185–203. doi:10.5771/1615-634x-2007-2-185
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., … Yuen, K. W. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L., & Mangen, S. (1996). Cross National Research Methods. London, UK: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2017). Introduction: Comparing journalistic cultures across nations. Journalism Studies, 18(5), 525–535. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1280229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F., & Vos, T. P. (2017). Charting the development of a field: A systematic analysis of comparative studies of journalism. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), May 25–29, San Diego, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, J. A. (2012). Comparative survey research. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 445–448). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J., & Hamidati, A. (2016). Beyond professional snail races: Contextualizing corporate communication in Indonesia. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2015.1131698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H., Park, H., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2012). Public segmentation and government public relationship building: A cluster analysis of publics in the United States and 19 European Countries. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(1), 37–68. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2012.626135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. H. (2010). Theorizing Chinese communication research: A holistic framework for comparative studies. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(1), 95–113. doi:10.1080/17544750903528880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-H. C. (2012). Gauging an integrated model of Public Relations Value Assessment (PRVA): Scale development and cross-cultural studies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(3), 243–265. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2012.671987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingenhoff, D., & Ruehl, C. (2013). International public relations: A synopsis of German-speaking and Anglo-American research approaches. Studies in Communication Sciences, 13(1), 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.scoms.2013.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Jain, R., De Moya, M., & Molleda, J. C. (2014). State of international public relations research: Narrowing the knowledge gap about the practice across borders. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 595–597. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, D. S., & Mastin, T. (2008). How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: A comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 54–56. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J.-A., Berger, B. K., & Shin, H. (2012). Comparative study of American and Korean practitioners’ dissent with perceived unethical management decisions. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 147–149. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-Y., & Ki, E.-J. (2014). An exploratory study of ethics codes of professional public relations associations: Proposing modified universal codes of ethics in public relations. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29(4), 238–257. doi:10.1080/08900523.2014.946602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. Y. (2012). Comparing intercultural communication. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 119–133). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kruckeberg, D., & Tsetsura, K. (2003). International index of bribery for news coverage: A composite index by country of variables related to the likelihood of the existence of “cash for news coverage.” Institute for Public Relations Online: International Research. Retrieved July 29, 2016, from www.instituteforpr.com
   Google Scholar
• L’Étang, J. (2012). Public relations, culture and anthropology—Towards an ethnographic research agenda. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 165–183. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2012.626134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. M., & Chang, T. K. (2009). Toward theoretical advancement of international public relations: A critical assessment of cross-national comparative public relations research, 1991–2007. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 95th Annual Convention of the National Communication Association (NCA), Chicago, IL. 2009, November.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national media research. London, UK: LSE Research Online.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2012). Challenges to comparative research in a globalizing media landscape. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 415–429). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P., & Hallin, D. C. (2012). Some caveats about comparative research in media studies. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammel (Eds.), Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 509–517). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N.-J. (2012). Comparative research designs. Toward a multilevel approach. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 430–444). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 723–730. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, J., Jin, Y., & Hung-Baesecke, F. C. J. (2013). Top issues and responsive strategies in public relations practice: An empirical assessment in the Greater China area. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 597–599. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molleda, J. C., & Laskin, A. V. (2005). Global, international, comparative, and regional public relations knowledge from 1990 to 2005: A quantitative content analysis of academic and trade publications. Miami, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Molleda, J. C., & Moreno, A. (2008). Balancing public relations with socioeconomic and political environments in transition: Comparative, contextualized research in Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 10(2), 115–174. doi:10.1177/152263790801000202
   Google Scholar
• Moon, B. B., Rhee, Y., & Yang, S.-U. (2016). Developing public’s information transmitting behavior (ITB) model in public relations: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(1), 4–18. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2015.1107482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, P. K. (2014). Comparing portrayals of beauty in outdoor advertisements across six cultures: Bulgaria, Hong Kong, Japan, Poland, South Korea, and Turkey. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(3), 242–261. doi:10.1080/01292986.2014.885535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2009). Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion? Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321–340. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örnebring, H. (2009). Comparative European journalism: The state of current research (Working Paper). Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Øyen, E. (Ed.). (1990). Comparative methodology: Theory and practice in international social research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M., & Dutta, M. (2008). Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 159–179. doi:10.1080/10627260801894280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, P.-L., & Xu, J. (2009). Online strategic communication: A cross-cultural analysis of U.S. and Chinese corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 251–253. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2013). Political communication cultures in Western Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). Research designs. In A. Prezworski & H. Teune (Eds.), The logic of comparative social inquiry (pp. 31–46). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. Ragin (eds.), Configurational comparative analysis (pp. 87–121). Thousand Oaks, CA, and London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods. Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706. doi:10.1177/0268580906067836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. (2012). Comparative content analysis. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 459–468). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. H., & Homer, E. (1976). Galton’s problem in cross-national research. World Politics, 29, 1–28. doi:10.2307/2010045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallot, L., Lyon, L., Acosta-Alzuru, C., & Jones, K. (2003). From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(1), 27–90. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1501_2
   Google Scholar
• So, C. (2017). Mapping Comparative Communication Research: What the Literature Reveals. In J. M. Chan & F. L. Lee (Eds.), Advancing Comparative Media and Communication Research (pp. 12–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K. (Ed.). (2004). Public relations in Asia: An anthology. Singapore: Thomson Learning Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K., Kim, Y., & Takasaki, M. (1999). Public relations in three Asian cultures: An analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(4), 271–292. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1104_01
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2003). The global public relations handbook. Theory, research and practice (1st ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2009). The global public relations handbook. Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. doi:10.1086/209528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, L., Gallagher, C. C., & Bie, B. (2014). Corporate social responsibility communication through corporate websites: A comparison of leading corporations in the United States and China. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(2), 205–227. doi:10.1177/2329488414525443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilson, D. J., & Alozie, E. L. (2004). Toward the common good: Perspectives in international public relations. New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. doi:10.1177/1534484305278283
   Google Scholar
• Tsetsura, K., & Klyueva, A. (2012). Comparing public relations. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 276–288). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and design. In F. Van De Vijver & K. Leung (Eds.), Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (pp. 27–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., Bütschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2004). A first look for parameters of public relations in Europe. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 1–34. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1601_2
   Google Scholar
• Verčič, D. (2013). Comparative research in public relations: From European to global research designs. In D. Ingenhoff (Ed.), Internationale PR-Forschung (pp. 291–300). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Verčič, D., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1996). Global and specific principles of public relations: Evidence from Slovenia. In H. M. Culbertson & N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations. A comparative analysis (pp. 31–65). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, L. (2008). Systematic reviewing. Social Research Update, 54. Accessed May 25, 2015, Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU54.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R. (2012). Advanced strategies for data analysis: Opportunities and challenges of comparative data. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 486–500). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, R. (2011). Critiquing the generic/specific PR theory: The need to close the transnational knowledge gap. In N. Bardhan & C. K. Weaver (Eds.), Public relations in global cultural contexts. Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 167–194). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., & Huang, Y. H. (2016). Contextuality, commensurability and comparability in comparative research: Learning from Chinese relationship research. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(2), 154–177. doi:10.1177/1069397116630241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., & Huang, C. Y. H. (2017). Comparative Guanxi Research Following the Commensurability/Incommensurability (C/I) Model. In J. M. Chan & F. L. Lee (Eds.), Advancing Comparative Media and Communication Research (pp. 94–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D., & Wilhoit, C. G. (1988). A profile of JMC educators: Traits, attitudes and values. The Journalism Educator, 43, 4–41. doi:10.1177/107769588804300202
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., & Kolb, S. (2012). Securing equivalence: Problems and solutions. In F. Esser, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 469–485). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2013). The relationship between the professionalization of public relations, societal social capital and democracy: Evidence from a cross-national study. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 257–270. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S.-H. (2007). Exploring the embassy sampling strategy for large-scale cross-national study in replicating the normative theory of global public relations. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 224–226. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Van Ruler, B., Rogojinaru, A., Verčič, D., & Hamrefors, S. (2007). European communication monitor 2007. Trends in communication management and public relations – results and implications. Leipzig, Germany: University of Leipzig/EUPRERA.
   Google Scholar