Expanding Evaluation to Progress Strategic Communication: Beyond Message Tracking to Open Listening

References

• Aarts, N. (2009). Een gesprek zonder einde [A never ending conversation]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Vosspuspers.
   Google Scholar
• Aarts, N., & Van Woerkum, C. (2008). Strategische communicatie [Strategic communication]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• AMEC (Association for Measurement and Evaluation of Communication). (2017). Integrated evaluation framework. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from http://amecorg.com/amecframework
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, A., & Nutbeam, D. (2014). Evaluation in a nutshell: A practical guide to the evaluation of health promotion programs (2nd ed.). North Ryde, NSW: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. (1976). Analyzing impacts of extension programs, ESC-575. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture Extension Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bentele, G. (2004). New perspectives of public relations in Europe. In B. van Ruler & D. Verčič (Eds.), Public relations and communication management in Europe (pp. 485–496). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bernays, E. (1923). Crystallising public opinion. New York, NY: Boni & Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, L. (1983). Relationship marketing. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Better Evaluation. (2016). Realist evaluation [Web site]. Melbourne, VIC: Author. Retrieved from http://betterevaluation.org/approach/realist_evaluation
   Google Scholar
• Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1987). The functions of program theory. In New directions for program evaluation (Vol. 33, pp. 5–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.1443
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell. (2017). Contributors notes: The international encylopedia of strategic communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, G. (2009). Cutlip & Center’s effective public relations (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, G., & Sha, B. (2013). Cutlip & Center’s effective public relations (11th ed.). Boston MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (R. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1923, 2nd ed. 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Rossi, P. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7(3), 283–302. doi:10.1177/0193841X8300700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. (2011). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. (2006). Communication as a practice. In G. Shepherd, G. St John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as … perspectives on theory (pp. 38–49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cutlip, M., Center, A., & Broom, G. (1985). Effective public relations (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. New York, NY: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Denning, S. (2016). How to make the whole organization ‘agile’. Strategy & Leadership, 44(4), 10–17. doi:10.1108/SL-06-2016-0043
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, D. (1992). The organisational roles of communications and public relations practitioners. In J. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 327–356). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DPRG/ICV (Deutsche Public Relations Gesellschaft and International Controller Verein). (2009). DPRG/ICV framework for communication controlling. Retrieved from http://www.communicationcontrolling.de/index.php?id=280&type=98&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=&L=3
   Google Scholar
• Dulek, R., & Campbell, K. (2015). On the dark side of strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 122–142. doi:10.1177/2329488414560107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). (2015a). Better regulation guidelines. Brussels, Belgium: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/guidelines/toc_guide_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). (2015b). External communication network code of conduct on measurement and evaluation of communication activities. Brussels, Belgium: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/communication/about/evaluation/documents/code-of-conduct-measurement-evaluation-communication-activities_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2015). Strategic communication in participatory culture: From one- and two-way communication to participatory communication through social media. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 337–350). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fawkes, J. (2015). Public relations ethics and professionalism: The shadow of excellence. Abingdon, Oxon., UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Crossroad. (Original work published 1960. J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.).
   Google Scholar
• GCS (Government Communication Service). (2016). GCS evaluation framework. London, UK: Cabinet Office. Retrieved from https://gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/GCS_GCS-Evaluation-framework_A4-_191115.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, E. (1948). Two-way street: The emergence of the public relations counsel. Boston, MA: Bellman Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. (2001). Public relations and evaluation: Does the reality match the rhetoric. Journal of Marketing Communications, 7, 171–189. doi:10.1080/13527260122625
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, A., & Willis, P. (2013). Strategic public relations leadership. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 23–48. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, L., Grunig, J., & Dozier, D. (2002). Excellent organizations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R., & Johansen, W. (Eds.). (2018). The international encyclopedia of strategic communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R. (2005). Public relations practice and political change in South Africa. Public Relations Review, 31(3), 407–416. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (2013). Strategic Communication – Pillars and perspectives of an alternative paradigm. In A. Zerfass, L. Rademacher, & S. Wehmeier (Eds.), Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations: Forschungsparadigmen und neue Perspektiven [Organizational communication and public relations: Research paradigms and new perspectives] (pp. 73–94). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (2015). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hon, L. (1997). What have you done for me lately? Exploring effectiveness in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 1–30. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0901_01
   Google Scholar
• Huhn, J., Sass, J., & Storck, C. (2011). Communication controlling: How to maximize and demonstrate the value creation through communication. Berlin, Germany: German Public Relations Association (DPRG). http://www.communicationcontrolling.de/fileadmin/communicationcontrolling/sonst_files/Position_paper_DPRG_ICV_2011_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg Foundation. (1998 /2004). Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: Author. Retrieved from https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide
   Google Scholar
• King, C. (2010). Emergent communication strategies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4(1), 19–38. doi:10.1080/15531180903415814
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J. (2008). Public relations: Concepts, practice and critique. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J., McKie, D., Snow, N., & Xifra, J. (2015). The Routledge handbook of critical public relations. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J., & Pieczka, M. (1996). Critical perspectives in public relations. London, UK: International Thomson Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J., & Pieczka, M. (2006). Public relations – Critical debates and contemporary practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Likely, F., & Watson, T. (2013). Measuring the edifice: Public relations measurement and evaluation practice over the course of 40 years. In J. Sriramesh, A. Zerfass, & J. Kim (Eds.), Public relations and communication management: Current trends and emerging topics (pp. 143–162). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenman, W. (1993). An ‘effectiveness yardstick’ to measure public relations success. Public Relations Quarterly, 38(1), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories of treatments. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 57, 5–38. doi:10.1002/ev.1637
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. (2008). Theories of human communication (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lukaszewski, J. (2001). How to develop the mind of a strategist, Part 3. IABC Communication World, 18(3), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. (2016). Organizational listening: The missing essential in public communication. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J. (2018). Evaluating public communication: Exploring new models, standards, and best practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J., & Likely, F. (2017). Revisiting the disciplinary home of evaluation: New perspectives to inform PR evaluation standards. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 2(2), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforpr.org/research-journal
   Google Scholar
• Matzler, K., Füller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., & Stieger, D. (2014). Open strategy: Towards a research agenda. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2416937
   Google Scholar
• McKie, D., & Munshi, D. (2007). Reconfiguring public relations: Equity, ecology and enterprise. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 231–255. doi:10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structure of organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 257–272. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060306
   Google Scholar
• Mirabeau, L., & Maguire, S. (2014). From autonomous strategic behaviour to emergent strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1202–1229. doi:10.1002/smj.2149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, A. (2015). Managing agile: Strategy, implementation, organization and people. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2015). Contextual Distortion: Strategic communication versus the contextual nature or nearly everything. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 113–126). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palmatier, R. (2008). Relationship marketing. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2001). Realistic evaluation bloodlines. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 317–324. doi:10.1177/109821400102200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Paper funded by the UK Cabinet Office. Retrieved from http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. (1992). Organizational theorists in a society of organizations. International Sociology, 7(3), 371–379. doi:10.1177/026858092007003008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T. (1986). What gets measured gets done. Tom Peters’ Writing [Web log]. Retrieved from http://tompeters.com/columns/what-gets-measured-gets-done
   Google Scholar
• Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). Search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P., Lipsey, M., & Freeman, H. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, K., & Kothari, A. (2014). Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: A state-of-the-art review. Implementation Science, 9(115), 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schendel, D., & Hofer, C. (1979). Introduction. In D. Schendel & C. Hofer (Eds.), Strategic management (pp. 1–22). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2015). US public diplomacy since 9-11: The challenges of integration. In G. Golan, S. Yang, & D. Kinsey (Eds.), International public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, W. (1971). The nature of communication between humans. In W. Schramm & D. Roberts (Eds.), The process and effects of mass communication (rev. ed., pp. 3–53). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreyoegg, G., & Steinmann, H. (1987). Strategic control: A new perspective. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 91–103. doi:10.2307/257996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi, S. (1994). Multinational corporations and the impact of public advocacy on corporate strategy: Nestlé and the infant formula controversy. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 658–660. doi:10.1057/jibs.1994.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative research: Principles and practice in public service and social action programs. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Power, E., & Henert, E. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension Program. Retrieved from https://fyi.uwex.edu/programdevelopment/files/2016/03/lmguidecomplete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A., Peteraf, M., Gamble, J., & Strickland, A. (2013). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (19th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill-Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Torp, S. (2015). The strategic turn in communication science: On the history and role of strategy in science from ancient Greece until the present day. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 34–52). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, T. (2001). Evaluating communication campaigns. In R. Rice & C. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 105–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B. (2016). Public relations: Too little emphasis on communication. Communication Management Review, 1(1), 6–27. doi:10.22522/cmr20160101
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (2004). Overview of public relations and communication management in Europe. In B. van Ruler & D. Verčič (Eds.), Public relations and communication management in Europe (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1972). Evaluative research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. (1970). Federal evaluation policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33, 77–92. doi:10.1002/ev.1447
   Google Scholar