Engaging the Public in Disaster Communication: The Effect of Message Framing on Sharing Intentions for Social Media Posts

References

• Accuweather. (2018, November 21). https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/accuweather-predicts-2018-wildfires-will-cost-california-total-economic-losses-of-400-billion/70006691
   Google Scholar
• Albris, K. (2018). The switchboard mechanism: How social media connected citizens during the 2013 floods in Dresden. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhabash, S., McAlister, A. R., Hagerstrom, A., Quilliam, E. T., Rifon, N. J., & Richards, J. I. (2013). Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (1st ed., pp. 233–253). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, A., & Hughes, A. L. (2017, May). Providing online crisis information: An analysis of official sources during the 2014 Carlton complex wildfire. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA. (pp. 3151–3162). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Bell, R., & Taylor, L. (2017). Persuasive effects of point of view, protagonist competence, and similarity in a health narrative about type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Communication, 22(8), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1341568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Liang, C., & Cai, D. (2018). Understanding WeChat users’ behavior of sharing social crisis information. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1427826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., & Sakamoto, Y. (2013, January). Perspective matters: Sharing of crisis information in social media. 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Wailea, Maui, HI, USA. (pp. 2033–2041). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2013.447
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. (2011). Primordial issues in communication ethics. In R. S. Fortner & P. M. Fackler (Eds.), The handbook of global communication and media ethics (pp. 1–19). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service. (2019, October 3). https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IF10244.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Attitudes and donation behavior when reading positive and negative charity appeals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(4), 444–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2019). Facebook reports first quarter 2019 results. https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_news/Facebook-Reports-First-Quarter-2019-Results.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gascó, M., Bayerl, P. S., Denef, S., & Akhgar, B. (2017). What do citizens communicate about during crises? Analyzing Twitter use during the 2011 UK riots. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher, F., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Expectations of reassurance influence the nature of fear-stimulated attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90033-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidry, J. P. D., Jin, Y., Orr, C. A., Messner, M., & Meganck, S. (2017). Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. L., Palen, L., Sutton, J., Liu, S. B., & Vieweg, S. (2008). “Site-seeing” in disaster: An examination of online social convergence. Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM 2008), Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, J., & Feng, B. (2018). The effects of gain-and loss-framed advice messages on recipients’ responses to advice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X1770696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgens, M., & Helsloot, I. (2018). The effect of social media on the dynamics of (self) resilience during disasters: A literature review. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnowski, V., Leonhard, L., & Kümpel, A. S. (2018). Why users share the news: A theory of reasoned action-based study on the antecedents of news-sharing behavior. Communication Research Reports, 35(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1379984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S. J., & Byrne, S. (2013). Construal level theory of mobile persuasion. Media Psychology, 16(3), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.798853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. D., & Capello, H. T. (2013). Spatial patterns and demographic indicators of effective social media content during the Horsethief Canyon fire of 2012. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.776727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J. (2012). The effects of gender and gain versus loss frame on processing breast cancer screening messages. Communication Research, 39(3), 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211427557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2020). The meaning of numbers: Effect of social media engagement metrics in risk communication. Communication Studies, 72(2), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1819842
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Lee, T. (2017). Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Namkoong, K., & Chen, J. (2020). Predictors of online news-sharing intention in the U.S and South Korea: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Communication Studies, 71(2),315-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1726427
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). Disentangling the influence of value predispositions and risk/benefit perceptions on support for nanotechnology among the American public. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Cameron, G. T. (2017). Utilizing audiovisual and gain-framed messages to attenuate psychological reactance toward weight management health messages. Health Communication, 32(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1099506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Stephens, K., Zhu, Y., & Murthy, D. (2019). Using social media to call for help in Hurricane Harvey: Bonding emotion, culture, and community relationships. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Zhang, Q., Tian, J., & Wang, H. (2018). Characterizing information propagation patterns in emergencies: A case study with Yiliang Earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. F., Fraustino, J. D., & Jin, Y. (2016). Social media use during disasters. Communication Research, 43(5), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H. (2016). The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication, 38(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015619173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, L. M., Ferguson, E., & O’Carroll, R. E. (2012). Living organ donation: The effect of message frame on an altruistic behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(6), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311423862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2012). Relative persuasiveness of gain-versus loss-framed human papillomavirus vaccination messages for the present-and future-minded. Human Communication Research, 38(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Dahlstrom, M. F., Richards, A., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Communication, 30(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.888629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Daily, K., & Qin, Y. (2018). Relative persuasiveness of gain-vs. loss-framed messages: A review of theoretical perspectives and developing an integrative framework. Review of Communication, 18(4), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1519845
   Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Futerfas, M., & Ma, Z. (2017). Role of narrative perspective and modality in the persuasiveness of public service advertisements promoting HPV vaccination. Health Communication, 32(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1138379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Fire Protection Association. (2019). https://www.nfpa.org/~/media/FD0144A044C84FC5BAF90C05C04890B7.ashx
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701849388
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain-and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication, 27(8), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.640974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Wu, D. (2012). Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: A meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(6), 2121–2133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palen, L., & Hughes, A. L. (2018). Social media in disaster communication. In H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, and J. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. Handbooks of sociology and social research. Springer. pp 497-518.
   Google Scholar
• Palen, L., & Liu, S. B. (2007). Citizen communications in crisis: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), San Jose, CA, USA, 727–736.
   Google Scholar
• Palen, L., Starbird, K., Vieweg, S., & Hughes, A. (2010). Twitter-based information distribution during the 2009 Red River Valley flood threat. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(5), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2010.1720360505
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. DOI:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Anderson, M. (2019). Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Piliavin, J. A., & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 27–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701397098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, C., & Spielhofer, T. (2017). Towards social resilience: A quantitative and qualitative survey on citizens’ perception of social media in emergencies in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva, S., McCaffrey, S., & Locke, D. (2017). Social media approaches to modeling wildfire smoke dispersion: Spatiotemporal and social scientific investigations. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1146–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1218528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, S., Fernandes, J., & Wang, W. (2015). The effects of gain versus loss message framing and point of reference on consumer responses to green advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2014.912600
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, E., & Matsa, E. (2018, September 10). News use across social media platforms 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008, May). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California wildfires. Proceedings of the 5th international ISCRAM conference Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, B., Tandoc, E. C., & Carmichael, C. (2015). Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to share worthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorauer, J., & Sasaki, S. (2014). Distinct effects of imagine-other versus imagine-self perspective-taking on prejudice reduction. Social Cognition, 32(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar