Testing Publics’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Advocacy Messaging: Linking Organizational and Social Outcomes

References

• Acock, A. C. (2014). A gentle introduction to Stata (6th ed.). Stata press.
   Google Scholar
• Afego P. N., & Alagidede, I. P. (2021). What does corporate social advocacy signal? Evidence from boycott participation decisions. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 5(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-10-2020-0040
   Google Scholar
• Attaran, S., Notarantonio, E. M., & Quigley, C. J., Jr. (2015). Consumer perceptions of credibility and selling intent among advertisements, advertorials, and editorials: A persuasion knowledge model approach. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(6), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2015.1088919
   Google Scholar
• Austin, L., Gaither, B., & Gaither, T. K. (2019). Corporate social advocacy as public interest communications: Exploring perceptions of corporate involvement in controversial social-political issues. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 3(2), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v3.i2.p3
   Google Scholar
• Badenes‐Rocha, A., Bigne, E., & Ruiz, C. (2022). Impact of cause‐related marketing on consumer advocacy and cause participation: A causal model based on self‐reports and eye‐tracking measures. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borden, J. (2019). Consumer attachment and corporate social advocacy: leveraging political behaviors to bolster organization-public relationships [ Doctoral dissertation], Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, O. S. A. C., & Lee, J. (2020). The mediating effects of message agreement on millennials’ response to advocacy advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(8), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1596969
   Google Scholar
• Browning, N., Lee, E., Park, Y. E., Kim, T., & Collins, R. (2020). Muting or meddling? Advocacy as a relational communication strategy affecting organization–public relationships and stakeholder response. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1026–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 549–574). Abingdon: Routledge Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. (2018). Looking back, moving forward: A review and reflection of the organization-public relationship (OPR) research. Public Relations Review, 44(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciszek, E., & Logan, N. (2018). Challenging the dialogic promise: How Ben and Jerry’s support for black lives matter fosters dissensus on social media. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelis, E., Adams, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2012). The effectiveness of regulatory (in) congruent ads: The moderating role of an ad’s rational versus emotional tone. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-2-397-420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., & Moore, M. (2005). Enhancing or disrupting guilt: The role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-29630300102-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiRusso Buckley, C., Diddi, P., Dardis, F. E., Vafeiadis, M., & Eng, N. (2022). Designing effective corporate social advocacy campaigns using valence, arousal, and issue salience. Public Relations Review, 48(3), 102207–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman. (2018). 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer. Global report. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2018-10/2018_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report_FEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edelman. (2020). Edelman Trust Barometer 2020. Global report. https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/440941/Trust%20Barometer%202020/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. A. (2018). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(4), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1514810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaither, B. M., Austin, L., & Collins, M. (2018). Examining the case of DICK’s sporting goods: Realignment of stakeholders through corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2), 176–176. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p176
   Google Scholar
• Gaither, B. M., & Sinclair, J. (2018). Environmental marketplace advocacy: Influences and implications of US Public response. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaveli, N. (2021). Two countries, two stories of CSR, customer trust and advocacy attitudes and behaviors? A study in the Greek and Bulgarian telecommunication sectors. European Management Review, 18(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000a). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000b). The influence of corporate credibility on consumer attitudes and purchase intent. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540122
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., Fernández, P., Apaolaza, V., Eisend, M., & D’Souza, C. (2021). Explaining viral CSR message propagation in social media: The role of normative influences. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04540-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2021). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Helitzer, D., Hollis, C., Cotner, J., & Oestreicher, N. (2009). Health literacy demands of written health information materials: An assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials. Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 16(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327480901600111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, C., & Li, C. (2020). To support or to boycott: A public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(5–6), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, W. M., Moon, T. W., & Kim, H. (2020). When and how does customer engagement in CSR initiatives lead to greater CSR participation? The role of CSR credibility and customer–company identification. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1878–1891. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., Melewar, T. C., Priporas, C. V., & Foroudi, P. (2020). Examining the effects of advertising credibility on brand credibility, corporate credibility and corporate image: A qualitative approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 23(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2017-0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2020). Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720947682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, Y., & Kent, A. (2012). Investigating the role of corporate credibility in corporate social marketing: A case study of environmental initiatives by professional sport organizations. Sport Management Review, 15(3), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, T., & Butt, M. M. (2013). How service quality influences brand equity: The dual mediating role of perceived value and corporate credibility. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321311298735
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. H., & Scileppi, J. A. (1969). Effects of ego-involvement conditions on attitude change to high and low credibility communicators. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 13(1), 31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ki, E. J., & Hon, L. C. (2007). Testing the linkages among the organization–public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260709336593
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2019). The process model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication: CSR communication and its relationship with consumers’ CSR knowledge, trust, and corporate reputation perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3433-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, S. H. (2019). Survey data collection; online panel efficacy. a comparative study of amazon mturk and research now ssi/survey monkey/opinion access. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(2). http://www.na-businesspress.com/JBD/JBD19-2/KimballSH_19_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2018). Dimensions of effective CSR communication based on public expectations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2015.1118143
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. T. (2014). Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–22. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sora-Kim-5/publication/275272287_Public_Expectations_of_CSR_Communication_What_and_How_to_Communicate_CSR/links/553666df0cf218056e94e68b/Public-Expectations-of-CSR-Communication-What-and-How-to-Communicate-CSR.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K., Overton, H., Alharbi, K., Carter, J., & Bhalla, N. (2023). Examining the determinants of consumer support for corporate social advocacy. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2022-0043
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Rim, H. (2019). The role of public skepticism and distrust in the process of CSR communication. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419866888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Song, D. (2018). When brand-related UGC induces effectiveness on social media: The role of content sponsorship and content type. International Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1349031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1086/425092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2009). Taking the target’s perspective: The persuasion knowledge model. In M.Wanke (Ed.), Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior (pp. 297–316). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781441605283
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-29639800002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, M., & Lemarié, L. (2022). Should companies hope instead? The role of verbal cues in consumers’ evaluation of cause‐related marketing (CRM). Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-81119880020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Chung, S. (2023). Publics’ views of corporate social advocacy initiatives: Exploring prior issue stance, attitude toward a company, and news credibility. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(2), 281–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Zhang, W., & Abitbol, A. (2019). What makes CSR communication lead to CSR participation? Testing the mediating effects of CSR associations, CSR credibility, and organization–public relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3609-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim J. S., & Young, C. (2021). Effects of issue ownership, perceived fit, and authenticity in corporate social advocacy on corporate reputation. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102071–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E. (1973). Initial attitude, source credibility, and involvement as factors in persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-10317390066-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, F., & Kang, J. (2020). How to alleviate consumer skepticism concerning corporate responsibility: The role of content and delivery in CSR communications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2477–2490. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2008). The influence of liking for a public service announcement on issue attitude. Communication Research, 35(4), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208316053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-29639900104-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, I. M., Jarvis, W., & Soutar, G. N. (2015). Integrating social issues and customer engagement to drive loyalty in a service organisation. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6–7), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2015-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, H., Choi, M., Weatherred, J. L., & Zhang, N. (2020). Testing the viability of emotions and issue involvement as predictors of CSA response behaviors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1824074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcha, J. M., & Kingsley Westerman, C. Y. (2020). How corporate social advocacy affects attitude change toward controversial social issues. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(3), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920912196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park. (2022). The mediating role of skepticism: How corporate social advocacy builds quality relationships with publics. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(8), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.1964580
   Google Scholar
• Park, K. (2021). The mediating role of skepticism: How corporate social advocacy builds quality relationships with publics. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(8), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Park K., & Jiang, H. (2023). Signaling, verification, and identification: the way corporate social advocacy generates brand loyalty on social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420907121
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion Springer New York. (pp. 1–24). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019). Views of the major problems facing the country. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/views-of-the-major-problems-facing-the-country/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2022a). Broad public approval of new gun law, but few say it will do a lot to stem gun violence. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/07/11/broad-public-approval-of-new-gun-law-but-few-say-it-will-do-a-lot-to-stem-gun-violence/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2022b). State of the union 2022: How Americans view major national issues. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/25/state-of-the-union-2022-how-americans-view-major-national-issues/
   Google Scholar
• Pressgrove, G., Barra, C., & Janoske, M. (2020). Using STOPS to predict prosocial behavioral intentions: Disentangling the effects of passive and active communicative action. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafi, M. A., & Jasjfi, E. F. (2020). Racism issues in Nike brand advertisement. Journal of Visual Communication Design, 5(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.37715/vcd.v5i1.2287
   Google Scholar
• Rim, H., Lee, Y., & Yoo, S. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101869–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rim, H., Xu, H., & Dong, C. (2022). Triadic public-company-issue relationships and publics’ reactions to corporate social advocacy (CSA): An application of balance theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(3–4), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2071273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C. N., Saridakis, C., & Musarra, G. (2020). Pathways to civic engagement with big social issues: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04276-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, B., & Lan, X. (2022). Meeting consumers’ expectations: Exploring corporate social advocacy communication in China. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(4), 2385–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sposito, V. A., Hand, M. L., & Skarpness, B. (1983). On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal estimators. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 12(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918308812318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson Holbert, R. L., & Zimmerman, R. S. (2006). On the use of structural equation modeling in health communication research. Health Communication, 20(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc2002_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census. (2020). Data profiles. Retrieved from https://data.census.gov/profile?q=United+States&g=010XX00US
   Google Scholar
• von Briel, D., & Dolnicar, S., Dolnicar, S. (2021). Activism, lobbying and corporate social responsibility by Airbnb–before, during and after COVID-19. The University of Queensland, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14264/ab59afd
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Kent, A. (2013). The roles of credibility and social consciousness in the corporate philanthropy-consumer behavior relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1472-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., He, L., Wu, Y. J., & Goh, M. (2021). Signaling persuasion in crowdfunding entrepreneurial narratives: The subjectivity vs objectivity debate. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waymer Gilliland, M. W., & Barbour, J. B. (2022). Examining the role of individuals’ perceptions of likelihood of sustained commitment in corporate-nonprofit partnership CSR advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1914455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinzimmer, L. G., & Esken, C. A. (2016). Risky business: Taking a stand on social issues. Business Horizons, 59(3), 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. (2010). The moderating effect of manipulative intent and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads. Psychology & Marketing, 27(5), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F., & Baur, D. (2016). “Why should we care about marriage equality?”: Political advocacy as a part of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2631-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao A., & Overton, H. K. (2022). Motivations for supporting corporate social advocacy: Applying the SIMCA model. Journal of Communication Management, 26(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-08-2021-0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Lee, E., & Rim, H. (2022). Should businesses take a stand? Effects of perceived psychological distance on consumers’ expectation and evaluation of corporate social advocacy. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(8), 840–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.1969588
   Google Scholar
• Yim, M. C. (2021). Fake, faulty, and authentic stand-taking: What determines the legitimacy of corporate social advocacy? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1856853
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., & Dong, C. (2022). Matching words with actions: Understanding the effects of CSA stance-action consistency on negative consumer responses. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2021-0060
   Google Scholar