The Evolution of the Sustainability Story: Strategic Sustainability Communication as Niche Construction

References

• Batel, S., Castro, P., Devine-Wright, P., & Howarth, C. (2016). Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: Contributions from social representations and social practices theories. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(5), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015). Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from social representations theory. Public Understanding of Science, 24(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513514165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzon, W. L. (1993). The evolution of narrative and the self. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-7361(93)90025-M
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A., & Hukkinen, J. I. (2011). The paradox of growth critique: Narrative analysis of the Finnish sustainable consumption and production debate. Ecological Economics, 72, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG reporting frameworks. In D. C. Esty & T. Cort (Eds.), Values at work (pp. 13–33). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, N. (2002). A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, N. (2010). Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buranyi, S. (2022). Do we need a new theory of evolution? The Guardian, source https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution,02/2023
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, P. (2015). Social representations of sustainability: Researching time, institution, conflict and communication. In G. In: Sammutt, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 295–308). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.6
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, Y. (2018). New narratives of development work? making sense of social entrepreneurs’ development narratives across time and economies. World Development. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3132169
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., & Svensson, E. (2017). The nature of strategic communication: A rejoinder to Nothhaft. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(3), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883
   Google Scholar
• Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. The American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, L., Serrao-Neumann, S., & Coiacetto, E. (2019). Climate change adaptation narratives: Linking climate knowledge and future thinking. Futures, 111, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culloty, E., Murphy, P., Brereton, P., Suiter, J., Smeaton, A. F., & Zhang, D. (2019). Researching visual representations of climate change. Environmental Communication, 13(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1533877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (1994). Effective public relations (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R., & Weick, K. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/258441
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (2017). On the origin of species (Vol. 133). Macmillan Collector’s Library.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. (2018). Organisational rhetoric in deeply pluralistic societies: The agonistic alternative. In Ø. Ihlen & R. Heath (Eds.), The handbook of organizational rhetoric and communication (pp. 301–313). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Walling, P., & Batterman, S. A. (1997). Environmental reporting by the Fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management, 21(6), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (2004). Extended Phenotype – but not too extended. A Reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biology and Philosophy, 19(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036180.14904.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods and results. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX, May.
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C. H. (2012). New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, S., Karmasin, M., Mueller, B., Terlutter, R., & Weder, F. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of integrated CSR communication. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Djerf-Pierre, M., Cokley, J., & Kuchel, L. J. (2016). Framing renewable energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication, 10(5), 634–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43 (4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenzl, T., & Mayring, P. (2017). QCAmap: eine interaktive Webapplikation für Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation ZSE, 37(3), 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, D., Haucke, F., & Sundermann, A. (2017). What does the media mean by ‘sustainability’ or ‘sustainable development’? An empirical analysis of sustainability terminology in German newspapers over two decades. Sustainable Development, 25(6), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. K. (2017). What is the story with sustainability? A narrative analysis of diverse and contested understandings. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 7(2), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0388-3
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., & Velamuri, S. R. (2006). A new approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility. In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 9–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98(3), 555–596. https://doi.org/10.1086/230049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, M., & Ramanathan, M. P. E. (2014). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility–is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0
   Google Scholar
• Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W. J., Nielsen, A. E., Thomsen, C., & Schultz, F. (2013). CSR communication: Quo vadis? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281311319472
   Google Scholar
• Golob, U., Podnar, K., & Zabkar, V. (2022). Sustainability communication. International Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2144035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability … . and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting?, Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management 1, 1–44. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01004-9
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. (2010). Evolutionary theory: The missing link for conceptualizing public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003801438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRI. (2022). Global reporting index. https://www.globalreporting.org
   Google Scholar
• Guske, A.-L., Jacob, K., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Peuckert, J., Schridde, S., Stinner, S., Zahrnt, F. W. D., & Ziesemer, F. (2019). Stories that change our world? Narratives of the sustainable economy. Sustainability, 11(21), 6163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Halme, M., & Huse, M. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00002-X
   Google Scholar
• Hauff, V. (2007). Brundtland Report: A 20 years update. In Keynote Speech presented at the European Sustainability: Linking Policies, Implementation, and Civil Society Action conference. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (Ed.). (2002). Power: A reader. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2018). What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(2), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17723737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendersson, H., & Wamsler, C. (2019). New stories for a more conscious, sustainable society: Claiming authorship of the climate story. Climatic Change, 158(3–4), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02599-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2006). Corporate Sustainability Reporting. An Overview. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting (pp. 301–324). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4974-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D., & Barkemeyer, R. (2012). Media coverage of sustainable development issues – attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustainable Development, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horcea-Milcu, A.-I. (2022). Values as leverage points for sustainability transformation: Two pathways for transformation research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 57, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ihlen, Ø., & van Ruler, B. (2009). Introduction: Applying social theory to public relations. In Ø. Ihlen & M. Fredriksson (Eds.), Public relations and social theory (pp. 9–28). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Green growth, degrowth, and the commons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. F. (2014). Sustainability as a global faith? The religious dimensions of sustainability and personal risk. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lft056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H. (1987). Human communication and contemporary evolutionary theory. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20(1–4), 79–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818709389276
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Hassan, A., Harrison, C., & Tarbert, H. (2020). CSR reporting: A review of research and agenda for future research. Management Research Review, 43(11), 1395–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2019-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinghoffer, D. (2017). Theory of evolution? Call it a “narrative” instead. Evolution News. https://evolutionnews.org/2017/01/theory_of_evolu/
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: Discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laland, K. (2018). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, R. C. (1983). Gene, organism and environment. In D. S. Bendall (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 273–285). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1982). Systems theory, evolution zheory, and communication theory. In N. Luhmann, The differentiation of society (translated by S. Holmes & C. Larmore) (pp. 255–270). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luksha, P. (2008). Niche construction: The process of opportunity creation in the environment. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lull, J. (2019). Evolutionary communication: An introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2020). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 495–513).
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2021). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., & Fenzl, T. (2019). Qualitative Inhaltsanaylse. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 633–648). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes - toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures and cultural framings (pp. 1–20). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, D., & Markusson, N. (2020). The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0740-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2010). Future prospects for corporate sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman, J. Bebbington & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 203–227). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. (2006). The storytelling animal. Radical Society, 32(1), 48.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Schulz, D., Fischer, D., Hetze, K., Laws, N., Lüdecke, G., & Rieckmann, M. (2013). Communication regarding sustainability: Conceptual perspectives and exploration of societal subsystems. Sustainability, 5(7), 2976–2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5072976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. (1995). Beyond materialism: A coevolutionary reinterpretation of the environmental crisis. Review of Social Economy, 53(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769500000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothhaft, H. (2016). A framework for strategic communication research: A call for synthesis and consilience. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1124277
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. A., & Komarova, N. L. (2001). Towards an evolutionary theory of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(7), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-66130001683-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. (2011). Auguste Comte. In G. Ritzer & J. Stepnisky (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to major social theorists (pp. 30–60). WIley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pirlet, K. (2005). Naturheilkunde ist Naturwissenschaft: Gesundheit und Heilung durch das Prinzip der Auslese im Turnover der Proteine. Kovac.
   Google Scholar
• Pollach, I. (2015). Strategic corporate social responsibility: The struggle for legitimacy and reputation. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 10(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2015.068685
   Google Scholar
• Pompper, D. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability and public relations: Negotiating multiple complex challenges. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1978). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica, 32(3–4), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1978.tb01321.x
   Google Scholar
• Rasche, A., Morsing, M., & Moon, J., (Eds.) (2017). Corporate social responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., & Fombrun, C. J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199908)20:8<691:AID-SMJ48>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, J. (2005). Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony? Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1701_6
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiffert-Brockmann, J. (2018). Evolutionary psychology: A framework for strategic communication research. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1490291
   Google Scholar
• Servaes, J. (2016). How ‘sustainable’ is development communication research? International Communication Gazette, 78(7), 701–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, H. (1898). What is social evolution? The nineteenth century and after: A monthly review. 44(259), 348–358.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M. S. (2001). Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2001.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, J. (2005). Sustainability and the civil commons: Rural communities in the age of globalization. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Robichaud, D. (2004). Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sense- making. Organization, 11(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P., & Findlay, S. (2010). Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to accepting evolution by natural selection. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. N., & Van de Fliert, E. (2014). Interrogating the theory and practice of communication for social change: The basis for a renewal. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tregidga, H. M., & Milne, M. J. (2006). From sustainable management to sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(4), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.534
   Google Scholar
• Trittin-Ulbrich, H. (2022). From the substantive to the ceremonial: Exploring interrelations between recognition and aspirational CSR talk. Business & Society, 62(5), 917–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221114795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2054-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2022). Sustainable development goals. Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
   Google Scholar
• Van der Leeuw, S. (2019). The role of narratives in human-environmental relations: An essay on elaborating win-win solutions to climate change and sustainability. Climatic Change, 160(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02403-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veland, S., Scoville-Simonds, M., Gram-Hanssen, I., Schorre, A. K., El Khoury, A., Nordbø, M. J. & Bjørkan, M. (2018). Narrative matters for sustainability: The transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5 C futures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weder, F. (2012). Die CSR-Debatte in den Printmedien: Anlässe, Themen, Deutungen. Facultas WUV Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F. (2021). Sustainability as master frame of the future? Potency and limits of sustainability as normative framework in corporate, political and NGO communication. In F. Weder, L. Krainer, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The sustainability communication reader (pp. 103–119). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F. (2022a). Nachhaltigkeit kultivieren. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Umwelt, Klima, nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transformation. Communicatio Socialis, 55(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F. (2022b). Strategic problematization of sustainability reframing dissent in strategic communication for transformation. Public Relations Inquiry, 11(3), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211026857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weder, F., & Dobrić, N. (2021). Conceptualisation of sustainability. Colloquium: New Philologies, 6(2), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.23963/cnp.2021.6.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F., Krainer, L., & Karmasin, M., (Eds.) (2021). The sustainability communication reader. A reflective compendium. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F., Lemke, S., & Tungarat, A. (2019). (Re)storying sustainability: The use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(19), 5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situation. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, P., & Etter, M. (2018). Strategic communication and emergence: A dual narrative framework. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452241
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, P., & Thummes, K. (2021). Ein Recht auf Opazität, Agonismus und Reartikulation: Paradoxe Prinzipien verantwortungsvoller Public Relations. MedienJournal, 44(3), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v44i3.1811
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. E., & Collins, E. (2007). Is sustainability sustainable? Corporate social responsibility, sustainable business, and management fashion. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 405–416). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar