Reading between the lines: Subtle stereotype threat cues can motivate performance

References

• BossonJK, HaymovitzEL, PinelEC. 2004. When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 40: 247–255 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00099-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownRP, PinelEC. 2003. Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 39: 626–633 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00039-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrPB, SteeleCM. 2009. Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45: 853–859 doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CroizetJC, DesprèsG, GauzinsME, HuguetP, LeyensJP, MèotA. 2004. Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 30: 721–731 doi: 10.1177/0146167204263961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DemerathL. 1993. Knowledge-based affect: Cognitive origins of ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Social Psychology Quarterly. 56: 136–147 doi: 10.2307/2787002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoyaK. 2008. Modulators of decision making. Nature Neuroscience. 11: 410–416 doi: 10.1038/nn2077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForbesCE, SchmaderT, AllenJJB. 2008. The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring: A neurophysiological study of minorities under threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 3: 253–261 doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallagherAM, De LisiR. 1994. Gender differences in Scholastic Aptitude Test – Mathematics problem solving among high-ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 86: 204–211 doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallagherAM, De LisiR, HolstPC, McGillicuddy-De LisiAV, MorelyM, CahalanC. 2000. Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 75: 165–190 doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaoG, GudykunstWB. 1990. Uncertainty, anxiety, and adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 14: 301–317 doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(90)90017-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarkinsSG. 2006. Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 91: 436–455 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InzlichtM, Ben-ZeevT. 2000. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science. 11: 365–371 doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JamiesonJP, HarkinsSG. 2007. Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 93: 544–564 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JamiesonJP, HarkinsSG. 2009. The effect of stereotype threat on quantitative GRE problems: A mere effort interpretation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 35: 1301–1314 doi: 10.1177/0146167209335165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JamiesonJP, HarkinsSG. 2011. The intervening task method: Implications for measuring mediation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 37: 652–661 doi: 10.1177/0146167211399776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaganJ. 1972. Motives and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 22: 51–66 doi: 10.1037/h0032356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellerJ. 2002. Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles. 47: 193–198 doi: 10.1023/A:1021003307511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KellerJ, DauenheimerD. 2003. Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 29: 371–381 doi: 10.1177/0146167202250218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KennyDA, KashyDA, BolgerN. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. Handbook of social psychology4th. GilbertD, FiskeST, LindzeyG. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1: 233–265.
   Google Scholar
• KirkR. 1995. Experimental design. Pacific GroveCA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• KrayLJ, ThompsonL, GalinskyA. 2001. Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 80: 942–958 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LazarusRS. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LogieRH, GilhoolyKJ, WynnV. 1994. Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory & Cognition. 22: 395–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’BrienLT, CrandallCS. 2003. Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 29: 782–789 doi: 10.1177/0146167203029006010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RangelA, CamererC, MontaguePR. 2008. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 9: 545–556 doi: 10.1038/nrn2357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichesonJA, TrawalterS. 2005. Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 88: 934–947 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RydellRJ, RydellMT, BoucherKL. 2010. The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99: 883–896 doi: 10.1037/a0021139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RydellRJ, ShiffrinRM, BoucherKL, Van LooK, RydellMT. 2010. Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107: 14042–14047 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002815107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmaderT, JohnsM. 2003. Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 85: 440–452 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmaderT, JohnsM, ForbesC. 2008. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review. 115: 336–356 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeibtB, ForsterJ. 2004. Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87: 38–56 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SekaquaptewaD, ThompsonM. 2003. Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: The effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 39: 68–74 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkinnerN, BrewerN. 2002. The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83: 678–692 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpencerSJ, SteeleCM, QuinnDM. 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 35: 4–28 doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteeleCM, AronsonJ. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 69: 797–811 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteeleCM, SpencerSJ, AronsonJ. 2002. Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in experimental social psychology. ZannaMP. San DiegoCA: Academic Press. 34: 379–440.
   Google Scholar
• StoneJ, McWhinnieC. 2008. Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44: 445–452 doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar